Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Applied Sciences, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(6), P. 2877 - 2877
Published: March 7, 2025
Maritime transport is a pivotal logistics mode for the long-distance and bulk transportation of goods. However, intricate planning involved in this often hindered by uncertainties, including weather conditions, cargo diversity, port dynamics, leading to increased costs. Consequently, accurate estimation total (stay) time vessel any delays at are essential efficient scheduling operations. This study aims develop predictive analytics address shortcomings previous works operations vessel’s Stay Time Delay Time, offering valuable contribution field maritime logistics. The proposed solution designed assist decision-making environments predict service delays. demonstrated through case on Brazil’s ports, where best performance observed tree-based methods. Additionally, feature analysis used understand interpret key factors impacting logistics, enhancing overall understanding complexities
Language: Английский
Citations
1Polish Maritime Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 31(2), P. 140 - 155
Published: June 1, 2024
Abstract Maritime transport forms the backbone of international logistics, as it allows for transfer bulk and long-haul products. The sophisticated planning required this form transportation frequently involves challenges such unpredictable weather, diverse types cargo kinds, changes in port conditions, all which can raise operational expenses. As a result, accurate projection ship’s total time spent port, anticipation potential delays, have become critical effective activity management. In work, we aim to develop management system based on enhanced prediction classification algorithms that are capable precisely forecasting lengths ship stays delays. On both training testing datasets, XGBoost model was found consistently outperform alternative approaches terms RMSE, MAE, R2 values turnaround waiting period models. When used model, had lowest RMSE 1.29 during 0.5019 testing, also achieved MAE 0.802 0.391 testing. It highest 0.9788 0.9933 Similarly, outperformed random forest decision tree models, with greatest phases.
Language: Английский
Citations
5Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 150, P. 110552 - 110552
Published: March 21, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Case Studies on Transport Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 101441 - 101441
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Maritime Transport Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8, P. 100133 - 100133
Published: April 26, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Transportation research procedia, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 86, P. 612 - 619
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Citations
0Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 176, P. 105128 - 105128
Published: May 16, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Advanced Engineering Informatics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 62, P. 102718 - 102718
Published: July 30, 2024
Citations
3Ocean Engineering, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 294, P. 116838 - 116838
Published: Jan. 24, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
2Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 136, P. 103011 - 103011
Published: Aug. 17, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0