A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure DOI
Charles B. van Rees, Laura C. Naslund, Darixa Hernandez-Abrams

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 832, P. 155078 - 155078

Published: April 8, 2022

Language: Английский

Regarding reference state to identify priority areas for ecological restoration in a karst region DOI
Jian Peng, Hui Tang, Chong Su

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 348, P. 119214 - 119214

Published: Oct. 17, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

14

Making Global Climate Action work for nature and people: Priorities for Race to Zero and Race to Resilience DOI Creative Commons
Idil Boran, Nathalie Pettorelli, Alexandre C. Köberle

et al.

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 159, P. 103803 - 103803

Published: June 20, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Harnessing bio and (Photo)catalysts for microplastics degradation and remediation in soil environment DOI
Haruna Adamu, Usman Bello,

Usman IbrahimTafida

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 370, P. 122543 - 122543

Published: Sept. 21, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Restoration in the Western Himalaya: a systematic review of current efforts and implications for the future DOI Open Access

Aashra H. Iype,

Kulbhushansingh Suryawanshi, Munib Khanyari

et al.

Restoration Ecology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 10, 2025

The Western Himalaya faces significant ecological challenges, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, and unsustainable development, prompting extensive restoration efforts. These scattered practices, ranging from large‐scale afforestation to more nuanced strategies, remain under‐assessed. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta‐Analyses guidelines, identifying dominant research themes various trends in practices detect knowledge gaps propose future priorities. We analyzed 100 peer‐reviewed gray literature articles January 1990 February 2024. Most interventions were reported Uttarakhand (53.7%, n = 183), followed by Himachal Pradesh (27.9%), Ladakh (10.3%), Jammu Kashmir (8.2%). Afforestation was the practice (34.3%, 117), concentrated Ladakh, while forest (17.6%, 60) ( 56). Research centered on “Restoration Techniques” (37.5%) “Stakeholder Engagement” (22.7%), “Policy & Governance” “Climate Change Mitigation Adaptation” under‐represented. Restoration goals primarily targeted “Ecosystem Functioning Services” (32%) “Biodiversity Enhancement” (22%) but largely ignored “Disaster Resilience” “Water Management.” Nearly half of species planted non‐native (47.6%), with median four per site, monitoring inconsistently reported, raising concerns about long‐term outcomes. Natural regeneration notably understudied, tokenistic tree‐planting drives rampant, particularly Trans‐Himalayas. suggest that ecology its application Himalayan ecosystems should be prioritized, together collaboration practitioners adoption consistent address landscape's unique challenges.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Using habitat suitability modeling to integrate ecosystem‐based approaches for mangrove restoration site selection DOI Creative Commons
Rodolfo Jaffé, Carolyn Paul, Molly T. McDermott

et al.

Ecosphere, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16(3)

Published: March 1, 2025

Abstract Mangrove forest restoration can improve services and functions across associated coastal ecosystems. However, the effectiveness of mangrove efforts is highly dependent on knowing locations habitat requirements target species within landscape interest. Habitat suitability models are powerful tools that identify suitable environmental conditions reduce risk poor site selection. When coupled with information potential future climate conditions, land‐use conflicts, co‐benefits (e.g., biodiversity), these be used to prioritize areas meet multiple stakeholder objectives help implement a broader ecosystem‐based approach restoration. In this study, we machine learning assess present forests Arabian Gulf. We then incorporated marine data from Qatar for in country where mangroves constitute only type forest. All tested (artificial neural networks, boosted regression trees, random forest, Maxent, Maxnet) showed high predictive performance, but percentage contributions each predictor differed models. Important predictors included elevation, slope, distance coastline, temperature, precipitation. While most predicted reduction region, there were sites located currently protected areas. identified several impact (i.e., suitability, far urban areas, closest live coral areas) northwest side Qatar. These results demonstrate modeling paired restrictions, proximity infrastructure, other ecosystems integrate an guide

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Mapping Re-Naturalization Pathways for Urban Ecological Governance: A Spatial Decision-Support Framework Based on Ecosystem Service Valuation DOI Creative Commons
Chengji Shu, Kaiwei Du,

Wenbo Cai

et al.

Land, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 14(5), P. 917 - 917

Published: April 23, 2025

Traditional urban expansion struggles to balance economic and ecological demands. Intensive development planning based on re-naturalization has become the policymakers’ choice. However, planning-oriented land use patterns pathways remain difficult determine. This study developed a spatial decision-support framework integrating ecosystem service valuation (ESV), land-use simulation, for Shanghai. assessed spatiotemporal dynamics of ESV simulated 2035 under different scenarios (inertial development, cropland protection, development). The optimal scenario corresponding were determined principle ESV. results showed that declined over past 20 years (−5.21%/5 years). High-value areas shrank significantly due space degradation. is scenario, with highest CNY 189,240.29 million, which higher than status quo, inertia protection by 9.69%, 23.27%, 9.53%, respectively. Taking as objective, 12 totaling 686.88 km2 identified. Cropland forestland built-up largest, accounting 67.88% 15.02%, provides valuable insights into in urbanized areas.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Evolution of a river management industry in Australia reveals meandering pathway to 2030 UN goals DOI Creative Commons
Kathryn Russell, Kirstie Fryirs, David Reid

et al.

Communications Earth & Environment, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 4(1)

Published: March 24, 2023

Abstract Globally, river management is a multi-billion-dollar industry. The United Nations (UN) Decade of Ecosystem Restoration calls for accelerated action towards integrated, participatory, and adaptive water resources management. Here we test whether the required shifts are occurring in Australian stream industry, an environmental industry developed western nation. We undertook structured review topic modelling 958 peer-reviewed papers presented at national conference from 1996-2021. investigated trends collaboration, transdisciplinary knowledge, diversity input perspectives, management, interaction with policy, responses to natural events. found that has matured over past 25 years, increasing interdisciplinarity. However, there was no measurable increase on-ground community participation or use findings highlight opportunities mature further achieve UN 2030 goals integrated resource ecosystem restoration.

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Site-based climate-smart tree species selection for forestation under climate change DOI Creative Commons
Wenhuan Xu, Anil Shrestha, Guangyu Wang

et al.

Climate smart agriculture., Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 1(2), P. 100019 - 100019

Published: Sept. 12, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3

How does restoration ecology consider climate change uncertainties in forested ecosystems? DOI Creative Commons
Katie Pita, Sara Wickham, Emma Lou Davis

et al.

Restoration Ecology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 17, 2024

Forest restoration is a powerful tool that combats forest loss and mitigates climate change. Our review asks how change considerations are integrated into restoration. We asked: (1) How many articles about practices discuss change; (2) has this changed over time; (3) when mentioned, it considered? used the framework created by Simonson et al. in 2021, which describes seven unique areas where practitioners can consider impacts their projects. These include adjusting species location for projected changes to fitness, mitigating risks, aligning practice with policy. reviewed literature through Web of Science evaluated publications inclusion these considerations. found number projects increased significantly since early 2000s, exceeding 200 2021. The proportion including terms “climate change” or “global warming,” also (35% 2021). Climate concepts were only considered what we defined as an “in‐depth” context 83 186 (45%). However, majority (115 186, 61%) did incorporate at least one considerations, even if they not satisfy our definition in‐depth consideration. Several discussed other described (2021), leading us recommend adding eighth criterion framework: place‐based communities Indigenous Knowledge Holders' responses

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Flexible Climate Adaptation Can Substantially Reduce Conservation Costs and Mitigate Risk DOI Creative Commons
Frankie Cho, Brooke Williams, Carla L. Archibald

et al.

Conservation Letters, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 18(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

ABSTRACT Climate change will have profound and unexpected impacts on biodiversity in the future. These could potentially be mitigated through adaptive responsive conservation planning, but it remains unclear how adaptation opportunities can harnessed careful planning of present‐day activities. Here, we show that use flexible strategies exploit for climate mitigate risks without increasing total costs. We estimate value allowing delays investments protecting habitats iconic threatened koala ( Phascolarctos cinereus ) eastern Australia. Conservation no option to strategically delay face significant trade‐offs between minimizing costs reducing outcomes. are substantially by into future when effects likely better understood. Strategic shown inflexible even results allocates resources while also flexibility shift these is much more achieve cost‐effective outcomes uncertain impacts.

Language: Английский

Citations

0