Cited by Comparison of learning curve for anterior and posterior implant placement using dynamic computer-assisted surgical implant placement in novice and experienced operators: An in vitro trial

Computer‐assisted and robotic implant surgery: Assessing the outcome measures of accuracy and educational implications DOI

Atiphan Pimkhaokham, James Chow, Alessandro Pozzi

et al.

Clinical Oral Implants Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 35(8), P. 939 - 953

Published: Nov. 23, 2023

This scoping review aimed to (1) critically evaluate the outcomes measures used assess accuracy of implant placement with Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS) and (2) evidence supporting efficient implementation CAIS in training education clinicians.

Language: Английский

Citations

Comparison of dynamic navigation systems in dental implantology: a systematic literature review of in vitro studies DOI

Ksenija Matvijenko, Rokas Borusevičius

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery DOI

Sofya Sadilina,

Kay Vietor,

Romain Doliveux

et al.

Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 11(3)

Published: May 16, 2025

ABSTRACT Objectives Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS) with different technologies and modalities is becoming increasingly utilized in clinical practice. The aim of this White Paper was to synthesize evidence, reported experience, best practices regard clinically relevant outcomes static, dynamic, robotic CAIS. Materials Methods A review the literature compiled existing evidence from studies up November 2024, which later discussed synthesized into questions a panel international experts. Results There overwhelming for superiority CAIS accuracy implant placement some limited superior esthetic outcomes. At same time, related primary stability, survival rates, intra‐ postoperative complications, marginal bone loss, peri‐implant tissue health appear similar between guided non‐guided surgery, while efficiency poorly defined studied. importance execution comprehensive, prosthetically driven treatment plan not reflected most studies, focus mainly on assessment procedures rather than entire workflows. Such inherent limitations available research might conceal potential Conclusions Guided can achieve at least as good surgery. Studies that assess benefits part workflow, isolated procedures, could improve our understanding these technologies.

Language: Английский

Citations

The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement With Different Methods of Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Clinical Studies DOI

Basel Mahardawi, Sirimanas Jiaranuchart, Sirida Arunjaroensuk

et al.

Clinical Oral Implants Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 36(1), P. 1 - 16

Published: Sept. 10, 2024

Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) has been introduced as a tool to aid in reaching more accurate position. The aim of this network meta-analysis was compare all the available CAIS techniques and obtain collective evidence on method that offers highest accuracy compared freehand placement.

Language: Английский

Citations

Accuracy of a calibration method based on cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner data registration for robot-assisted implant placement: An in vitro study DOI

Yi Li,

Jizhe Lyu,

Xunning Cao

et al.

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

Comparison of accuracy in freehand versus computer-assisted (dynamic and static) dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis DOI

Saurav Banerjee,

Anasua Debnath,

Pramila Paul

et al.

The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 25(1), P. 22 - 29

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Purpose: When compared to conventional freehand procedures, the development of computer-assisted techniques in dental implant insertion surgery has significantly changed traditional practices, bringing about a movement toward improved precision and predictability. The purpose this study was evaluate efficiency methods versus static–dynamic placement procedures terms accuracy precision. Methodology: This followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, screening 438 articles from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web Science. inclusion criteria were randomized nonrandomized control trials, case controls retrospective studies, focusing on platform deviation, angular apical deviation dynamic, static, surgeries. Eleven studies selected review, with nine included meta-analysis. Heterogeneity analyzed using appropriate statistical models ensure robust findings reliability results. Results: meta-analysis comparing across techniques. Dynamic systems showed superior accuracy, deviations 0.64–1.73 mm, 2.49°–5.75°, 0.89–1.86 mm. Static slightly greater variability, 0.97–2.34 mm 2.2°–4.98°. Freehand demonstrated highest deviations, up 3.48 10.09°. Prediction intervals indicated consistent superiority dynamic guidance metrics. Conclusion: static methods, provides more In dentistry, adopting guided is essential attaining best clinical results raising patient satisfaction.

Language: Английский

Citations

Stackable Guides DOI

Justin Odette,

Marilyn Andersen,

Daniel A. Hammer

et al.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

Comparison of learning curve for anterior and posterior implant placement using dynamic computer-assisted surgical implant placement in novice and experienced operators: An in vitro trial DOI

Pitsinee Kundaechanont,

Pravej Serichetaphonges,

Atiphan Pimkhaokham

et al.

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations