COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (Preprint) DOI Creative Commons

Tahani Al Rahbeni,

Prakasini Satapathy, Ramaiah Itumalla

et al.

Published: Nov. 21, 2023

BACKGROUND The unprecedented emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated development and global distribution vaccines, making understanding vaccine acceptance hesitancy crucial to overcoming barriers vaccination achieving widespread immunization. OBJECTIVE This umbrella review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews meta-analyses provide insights into perceptions on across diverse populations regions. METHODS We conducted a literature search major databases identify meta-analysis that reported hesitancy. AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool Assess Systematic Reviews) criteria were used assess methodological quality included reviews. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 with random effect model. data synthesis is presented in table format via narrative. RESULTS Our inclusion met by 78 published between 2021 2023. analysis revealed moderate rate 63% (95% CI 0.60%-0.67%) general population, significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97.59%). Higher rates observed among health care workers individuals chronic diseases, at 64% 0.57%-0.71%) 69% 0.61%-0.76%), respectively. However, lower noted pregnant women, 48% 0.42%-0.53%), parents consenting for their children, 61.29% 0.56%-0.67%). pooled 32% 0.25%-0.39%) population. assessment 19 high-quality, 38 moderate-quality, 15 low-quality, 6 critically low-quality meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS presence globally, emphasizing necessity population-specific, culturally sensitive interventions clear, credible information dissemination foster acceptance. disparities accentuate need continuous research understand evolving address unique concerns needs populations, thereby aiding formulation effective inclusive strategies. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42023468363; https://tinyurl.com/2p9kv9cr

Language: Английский

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis DOI Creative Commons

Tahani Al Rahbeni,

Prakasini Satapathy, Ramaiah Itumalla

et al.

JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10, P. e54769 - e54769

Published: April 30, 2024

The unprecedented emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated development and global distribution vaccines, making understanding vaccine acceptance hesitancy crucial to overcoming barriers vaccination achieving widespread immunization.

Language: Английский

Citations

13
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Coverage of Recommended Vaccinations in Individuals with Chronic Medical Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Telephone Survey in Italy DOI Creative Commons
Vincenza Sansone, Grazia Miraglia del Giudice, Giorgia Della Polla

et al.

Vaccines, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(3), P. 336 - 336

Published: March 20, 2024

Background: This cross-sectional survey investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and coverage of recommended vaccinations among a random sample patients with chronic medical conditions, at higher risk vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), in Italy. Methods: The was conducted via telephone-based interviews. Results: Multinomial regression analysis showed that who believed VPDs were severe more likely to know one vaccination; those advised from general practitioner (GP) two vaccinations; older, graduated, time diagnosis, severe, did not need additional information, GP three or four vaccinations. Patients knew least vaccination, perceived themselves risk, have received than vaccination receive Among unvaccinated, unmarried/not cohabiting, needed useful safe willing Conclusions: Educational interventions are improve adherence individuals conditions.

Language: Английский

Citations

9
Prevalence and determinants to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among people living with HIV in Bench Sheko zone, Southwest Ethiopia: A multi-center study DOI Creative Commons
Melsew Setegn Alie, Gossa Fetene Abebe, Yilkal Negesse

et al.

Heliyon, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(6), P. e27901 - e27901

Published: March 1, 2024

In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) identified coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) as one of top 10 threats to global health. Currently, vaccine hesitancy is most common obstacle reducing COVID-19 incidence and achieving herd immunity worldwide. Understanding factors influencing in this specific population crucial for developing targeted interventions improve uptake protect vulnerable communities. Therefore, study aimed evaluate prevalence determinants among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who receive care at public health facilities Bench Sheko Zone, Southwest Ethiopia.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on college students’ hesitancy to receive additional COVID-19 vaccine booster doses: A study from Taizhou, China DOI Creative Commons

Jing-Shan Deng,

Chun-Lian Huang, Hu Q

et al.

Preventive Medicine Reports, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 41, P. 102709 - 102709

Published: March 29, 2024

This study aimed to examine the impact of a history SARS-CoV-2 infection on hesitancy college students receive additional COVID-19 vaccine booster doses. A population-based self-administered online survey was conducted in July 2024 Taizhou, China. total 792 respondents were included this study. Logistic regression identify factors associated with students' hesitation doses vaccine. Of respondents, 32.2 % hesitated booster. Furthermore, 23.5 reported an increase receiving compared before they infected SARS-CoV-2. In analyses, who had secondary more hesitant (OR = 0.481, 95 CI: (0.299-0.774), P 0.003). Moreover, infections male 0.417, 0.221-0.784, 0.007), lower than bachelor's degree 0.471, 0.272-0.815, non-medical majors 0.460, 0.248-0.856, 0.014), and sophomores or below 0.483, 0.286-0.817, 0.007) affects doses, which higher those experienced infections.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Coverage and predictors of COVID-19 vaccination in rural districts of Pakistan DOI Open Access

Shiraz Shaikh,

Greesh Maheshwari,

Allah N. Samoo

et al.

Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 30(4), P. 264 - 271

Published: May 13, 2024

Background: One of the keys to preventing a re-emergence COVID-19 pandemic is attainment and maintenance high vaccination coverage in urban rural areas. Aims: To estimate population identify determinants vaccination. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted April 2023 5 districts Sindh Province, Pakistan. From each district, 30 clusters (villages) were randomly selected, 7 households sampled from cluster using 30/7 technique. Household members above 12 years age included. Vaccination status categorized as non-vaccinated, partially vaccinated (either with 1 dose or without booster) completely (2 doses booster). Adjusted odds ratios 95% confidence intervals multinomial logistic regression computed determine factors associated partial complete Data analysed SPSS version 20. Results: Among 3545 individuals surveyed across 1050 households, 25.9% not vaccinated, 55.0% 19.1% fully vaccinated. Younger age, lack formal education residing flood-affected significantly negatively being while living at > km facility positively Residents Dadu (OR=0.03, CI=0.01–0.04), Jamshoro (OR=0.05, CI=0.03–0.08), Hyderabad CI=0.02–0.05), Tando Allahyar (OR=0.09,95% CI=0.05–0.15) less likely be than those Tharparkar. The most common reasons for were, perception that mild (34.5%), fear side-effects (22.7%), unavailability vaccine (19.8%), acquiring infection through (15.8%). Conclusion: low some districts, particularly mainly due certain myths. There need community outreaches debunk myths about among these populations.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students, health professionals, and health care workers: an umbrella review DOI Creative Commons
Sehar Iqbal, Taima Qudah, Inayat Ali

et al.

Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 13(4), P. 263 - 263

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Vaccination provides great protection against several infections, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the endeavor faces multiple context-specific problems that affect its uptake, leading to vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy is a focal barrier success of COVID-19 vaccination programs. This umbrella review aimed present summary global data regarding and acceptance rates among medical students, health professionals, care workers. In this regard, two databases, PubMed Scopus, were selected for retrieval analysis. A search term an inclusion/exclusion criterion applied summarize findings existing systematic reviews. pooled prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was taken as prerequisite review. The results found high percentage ranging from 13.1% (95% CI, 6.9%-20.9%) 46% 0.38%-0.54%), while varied 37%-54%) 83.0% 71%-96%) Further studies analyzing determinants are important predictors successful programs at level.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (Preprint) DOI Creative Commons

Tahani Al Rahbeni,

Prakasini Satapathy, Ramaiah Itumalla

et al.

Published: Nov. 21, 2023

BACKGROUND The unprecedented emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated development and global distribution vaccines, making understanding vaccine acceptance hesitancy crucial to overcoming barriers vaccination achieving widespread immunization. OBJECTIVE This umbrella review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews meta-analyses provide insights into perceptions on across diverse populations regions. METHODS We conducted a literature search major databases identify meta-analysis that reported hesitancy. AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool Assess Systematic Reviews) criteria were used assess methodological quality included reviews. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17 with random effect model. data synthesis is presented in table format via narrative. RESULTS Our inclusion met by 78 published between 2021 2023. analysis revealed moderate rate 63% (95% CI 0.60%-0.67%) general population, significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97.59%). Higher rates observed among health care workers individuals chronic diseases, at 64% 0.57%-0.71%) 69% 0.61%-0.76%), respectively. However, lower noted pregnant women, 48% 0.42%-0.53%), parents consenting for their children, 61.29% 0.56%-0.67%). pooled 32% 0.25%-0.39%) population. assessment 19 high-quality, 38 moderate-quality, 15 low-quality, 6 critically low-quality meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS presence globally, emphasizing necessity population-specific, culturally sensitive interventions clear, credible information dissemination foster acceptance. disparities accentuate need continuous research understand evolving address unique concerns needs populations, thereby aiding formulation effective inclusive strategies. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42023468363; https://tinyurl.com/2p9kv9cr

Language: Английский

Citations

0