Biodiversity burdens in Spanish conventional and low-impact single-family homes DOI Creative Commons
Borja Izaola, Ortzi Akizu‐Gardoki

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 909, P. 168371 - 168371

Published: Nov. 11, 2023

Biodiversity loss caused by housing is not a well-defined sector of environmental impact. This research quantifies effects on biodiversity an average Spanish Single-Family House (SFH) with 180 m2 built surface. The current SFH stock GWP amounts to 1.16 Gt CO2eq in 50-year life cycle, 40 % which embodied the building materials and 60 are emissions due use building. also impacts 10.2 1,4-DCB land, water human health. SFHs drive 6052 species extinct 50 year account for 3.03 M years lost premature death or lived disability. Divided 16 people living SFHs, each one 0.19 their lives (68.1 days) home's article compares reference conventional against three low-impact cases, understand how different techniques influence outcomes that keep lowest possible. Scenarios include standard brick concrete house as Scenario 0 (SC0, Base), timber Passivhaus 1 (SC1), straw-bale renewable energies 2 (SC2), earth bioclimatic 3 (SC3). An initial Global Warming Potential (GWP) analysis was performed relate previous Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies metrics. Three main metrics; ecotoxicity (as midpoint indicator), damage health (both endpoint indicators) have been considered. Compared SC0 1292 kgCO2-eq·m-2 (516 embodied) GWP, we found SC1 emitted -47.0 that, SC2-41.4 SC3-80.9 %. Concerning ecotoxicity, where has 11,399 kg 1,4 DCB, results -27.9 SC1, -19.2 SC2, -45.6 SC3. Regarding loss, 7.54 E-06 species.yr·m-2, -30.9 -32.6 -58.6 Human being 3.37 E-03 DALY, reduced home (SC1) -44.2 %, Straw (SC2) -39.2 (SC3) -67.1 shows existing technological solutions could be -80.9 Houses timber, real alternatives cement traditional

Language: Английский

Estimating the impact range of circular economy actions for buildings on basic material demand in the European Union: A combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches DOI Creative Commons
Meta Thurid Lotz, Jesús Rosales Carreón, Ernst Worrell

et al.

Sustainable Production and Consumption, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 51, P. 532 - 544

Published: Oct. 5, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

The Path to a Sustainable Energy Europe: An Analysis of the Transition from Fossil Fuels to Renewable Energy DOI Creative Commons
Cătălin-Laurențiu Rotaru, Diana Timiș,

Giani-Ionel Gădinaru

et al.

Published: Jan. 12, 2024

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the application predictive analytics techniques in energy field and identify strategies stimulate renewable production. analysis begins by examining four key indicators: energy, gas price, consumption through a detailed descriptive analysis. Visual graphs are built get an overview evolution sector period 2011-2020 with help Tableau software. supported use Random Forest algorithm as prediction model, considering critical indicators such consumption. results provide insight into anticipating changes production European countries studied. At same time, highlights current situation Europe identifies necessary measures for its sustainable development specialized literature. It also examines way which big data management, facilitated technologies smart meters drone sensors, can improve sector. This research offers valuable results, providing insights fossil well comparison prices, trends By integrating techniques, management energy-specific indicators, makes innovative contribution systems Its focus on contributes understanding growth potential generation region.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Circular Economy Strategies for Decarbonization of the Built Environment Value Chain Scope 3 Emissions: A Network Analysis DOI
Radwa Eissa, Islam H. El-adaway

Construction Research Congress 2022, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 10 - 20

Published: March 18, 2024

With the anticipated growth in construction activities, minimizing value chain emissions, including those attributed to activities beyond an organization's direct control—aka "Scope 3" and adopting circular economy (CE) practices have become critical attaining 2050 climate goals. Extant literature lacks a value-chain-comprehensive set of CE strategies on one hand, analysis their actual project applications other. This research aims build holistic portfolio actionable that span across entire built environment chain, analyzing extent implementation interlinkages within versus projects. To this end, authors conducted systematic practice review extract collate case studies, quantified frequency for each through network analysis. Results revealed broad yet fragmented implementation, with most frequently implemented requiring sustainability ratings, passive design measures, landfill diversion, whereas targeting logistics property market phases were rather scarce. Ultimately, findings herein can serve as foundation multifunctional database chain-specific studies guide industry its track decarbonization.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Towards circular renovation: a comparative review of circular economy integration in sustainable building rating systems DOI Creative Commons
Alysson Nicole Lucas, Sandra Karina Löschke

Building Research & Information, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 22

Published: Oct. 3, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Biodiversity burdens in Spanish conventional and low-impact single-family homes DOI Creative Commons
Borja Izaola, Ortzi Akizu‐Gardoki

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 909, P. 168371 - 168371

Published: Nov. 11, 2023

Biodiversity loss caused by housing is not a well-defined sector of environmental impact. This research quantifies effects on biodiversity an average Spanish Single-Family House (SFH) with 180 m2 built surface. The current SFH stock GWP amounts to 1.16 Gt CO2eq in 50-year life cycle, 40 % which embodied the building materials and 60 are emissions due use building. also impacts 10.2 1,4-DCB land, water human health. SFHs drive 6052 species extinct 50 year account for 3.03 M years lost premature death or lived disability. Divided 16 people living SFHs, each one 0.19 their lives (68.1 days) home's article compares reference conventional against three low-impact cases, understand how different techniques influence outcomes that keep lowest possible. Scenarios include standard brick concrete house as Scenario 0 (SC0, Base), timber Passivhaus 1 (SC1), straw-bale renewable energies 2 (SC2), earth bioclimatic 3 (SC3). An initial Global Warming Potential (GWP) analysis was performed relate previous Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies metrics. Three main metrics; ecotoxicity (as midpoint indicator), damage health (both endpoint indicators) have been considered. Compared SC0 1292 kgCO2-eq·m-2 (516 embodied) GWP, we found SC1 emitted -47.0 that, SC2-41.4 SC3-80.9 %. Concerning ecotoxicity, where has 11,399 kg 1,4 DCB, results -27.9 SC1, -19.2 SC2, -45.6 SC3. Regarding loss, 7.54 E-06 species.yr·m-2, -30.9 -32.6 -58.6 Human being 3.37 E-03 DALY, reduced home (SC1) -44.2 %, Straw (SC2) -39.2 (SC3) -67.1 shows existing technological solutions could be -80.9 Houses timber, real alternatives cement traditional

Language: Английский

Citations

1