Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
11(23), P. 6792 - 6792
Published: Nov. 29, 2019
The
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(SDGs)
can
be
grouped
into
three
domains,
the
environmental
domain,
social
domain
and
economic
domain.
These
different
layers
influence
each
other;
hence
sustainable
progress
in
layer
cannot
achieved
without
good
two
other
layers.
To
achieve
SDGs,
transitions
current
system
are
needed
actions
should
taken
that
support
contribute
to
short
term
needs
long
(global)
goals.
Therefore,
it
is
necessary
have
knowledge
of
understand
phases
transition.
In
this
paper
we
discuss
key
role
soil-water
these
achievement
SDGs
by
2030.
increasing
pressure
on
land
calls
for
multi-use
restoration
degraded
land.
Healthy
soils
healthy
basic
conditions
successful
implementation
realization
SDGs.
enable
a
management
soil
water
transition
approach
prerequisite.
X-curve
used
describe
transitions,
stakeholders
given
framework,
which
provides
perspective
action,
specifically
science
governance
phase
This
framework
provide
required
intensive
guidance
(1)
analyze
impact
provided
incentives,
(2)
identify
new
reference
points
(3)
stimulate
catalysts,
(iv)
innovate
testing
cutting
edge
policy
instruments
close
cooperation
with
society.
make
realize
2030
lies
combining
initiatives,
steering
flows
continuously
assessing
stage
transition,
order
plan
specific
steps
framework.
Both
scientist
makers
an
important
guidance.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
27(8), P. 1518 - 1546
Published: Feb. 1, 2021
Abstract
Nature‐based
solutions
(NbS)—solutions
to
societal
challenges
that
involve
working
with
nature—have
recently
gained
popularity
as
an
integrated
approach
can
address
climate
change
and
biodiversity
loss,
while
supporting
sustainable
development.
Although
well‐designed
NbS
deliver
multiple
benefits
for
people
nature,
much
of
the
recent
limelight
has
been
on
tree
planting
carbon
sequestration.
There
are
serious
concerns
this
is
distracting
from
need
rapidly
phase
out
use
fossil
fuels
protect
existing
intact
ecosystems.
also
expansion
forestry
framed
a
mitigation
solution
coming
at
cost
rich
biodiverse
native
ecosystems
local
resource
rights.
Here,
we
discuss
promise
pitfalls
framing
its
current
political
traction,
present
recommendations
how
get
message
right.
We
urge
policymakers,
practitioners
researchers
consider
synergies
trade‐offs
associated
follow
four
guiding
principles
enable
provide
society:
(1)
not
substitute
rapid
fuels;
(2)
wide
range
land
in
sea,
just
forests;
(3)
implemented
full
engagement
consent
Indigenous
Peoples
communities
way
respects
their
cultural
ecological
rights;
(4)
should
be
explicitly
designed
measurable
biodiversity.
Only
by
following
these
guidelines
will
design
robust
resilient
urgent
sustaining
nature
together,
now
into
future.
Environmental Science & Policy,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
98, P. 20 - 29
Published: May 13, 2019
Despite
substantial
increases
in
the
scope
and
magnitude
of
biodiversity
conservation
ecological
restoration,
there
remains
ongoing
degradation
natural
resources
that
adversely
affects
both
human
well-being.
Nature-based
Solutions
(NbS)
can
be
an
effective
framework
for
reversing
this
trend,
by
increasing
alignment
between
sustainable
development
objectives.
However,
unless
is
clarity
on
its
evolution,
definition
principles,
relationship
with
related
approaches,
it
will
not
possible
to
develop
evidence-based
standards
guidelines,
or
implement,
assess,
improve
upscale
NbS
interventions
globally.
In
order
address
gap,
we
present
principles
underpinning
framework,
recently
adopted
International
Union
Conservation
Nature,
compare
(1)
Ecosystem
Approach
was
foundation
developing
definitional
(2)
four
specific
ecosystem-based
approaches
(Forest
Landscape
Restoration,
Ecosystem-based
Adaptation,
Ecological
Restoration
Protected
Areas)
considered
as
falling
under
framework.
Although
found
other
frameworks,
three
eight
stand
out
from
approaches:
implemented
alone
integrated
manner
solutions;
should
applied
at
a
landscape
scale;
and,
are
integral
overall
design
policies,
measures
actions,
societal
challenges.
Reversely,
concepts
such
adaptive
management/governance,
effectiveness,
uncertainty,
multi-stakeholder
participation,
temporal
scale
frameworks
but
captured
all
detailed
enough
principles.
This
critical
analysis
strengths
weaknesses
inform
review
revision
supporting
types
(such
reviewed
here),
well
serve
successful
implementation
NbS.
Land,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
7(4), P. 133 - 133
Published: Nov. 10, 2018
In
the
effort
to
achieve
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(SDGs)
related
food,
health,
water,
and
climate,
an
increase
in
pressure
on
land
is
highly
likely.
To
avoid
further
degradation
promote
restoration,
multifunctional
use
of
needed
within
boundaries
soil-water
system.
addition,
awareness-raising,
a
change
stakeholders’
attitudes,
economics
are
essential.
The
attainment
balance
between
economy,
society,
biosphere
calls
for
holistic
approach.
this
paper,
we
introduce
four
concepts
that
consider
be
conducive
realizing
LDN
more
integrated
way:
systems
thinking,
connectivity,
nature-based
solutions,
regenerative
economics.
We
illustrate
application
these
through
three
examples
agricultural
settings.
Systems
thinking
lies
at
base
others,
stressing
feedback
loops
but
also
delayed
responses.
Their
simultaneous
will
result
robust
which
sustainable
from
environmental,
societal,
economic
point
view.
Solutions
need
take
into
account
level
scale
(global,
national,
regional,
local),
interests
culture,
availability
financial
natural
capital.
Furthermore,
solutions
embed
short-term
management
long-term
landscape
planning.
conclusion,
paradigm
shifts
needed.
First,
it
necessary
move
excessive
exploitation
combination
with
environmental
protection,
accomplish
this,
new
business
models
based
thinking;
approach
integrates
social,
interests.
Second,
shift
“system
follows
function”
towards
“function
system”
one.
Only
by
making
transition
socio-economical-ecological
analysis,
using
such
as
do
stand
chance
Land
Degradation
Neutrality
2030.
make
shifts,
awareness-raising
relation
different
type
governance,
economy
land-use
planning
Environmental Science & Policy,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
93, P. 101 - 111
Published: Jan. 3, 2019
Nature-based
solutions
are
proliferating
in
European
cities
over
the
past
years
as
viable
to
urban
challenges
such
climate
change,
degeneration
and
aging
infrastructures.
With
evidence
amounting
about
nature-based
solutions,
there
is
a
need
translate
knowledge
future
policy
planning.
In
this
paper,
we
analysed
fifteen
cases
of
solutions'
experiments
across
11
cities.
What
makes
our
case
studies
stand
out
balanced
focus
between
ecosystem
social
benefits
contrast
many
published
on
that
have
weighted
benefits.
From
cross-case
comparative
analysis
draw
seven
overarching
lessons
related
all
stages
proof-of-concept
implementation
cities:
(a)
be
aesthetically
appealing
citizens,
(b)
create
new
green
commons,
(c)
experimenting
with
requires
trust
local
government
experimentation
process
itself,
(d)
co-creation
diversity
learning
from
innovation,
(e)
require
collaborative
governance,
(f)
an
inclusive
narrative
mission
for
can
enable
integration
agendas
(g)
design
so
learn
replicate
them
long-term.
The
show
multiple
disciplines
their
design,
(of
settings)
recognition
place-based
transformative
potential
'superior'
grey
infrastructure.
We
further
discern
planners
open
approach
governance
allows
designs,
perceptions
images
nature
different
actors,
forming
institutions
operating
maintaining
ensure
inclusivity,
livability
resilience.
BioScience,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
69(6), P. 455 - 466
Published: March 23, 2019
Nature-based
solutions
offer
an
exciting
prospect
for
resilience
building
and
advancing
urban
planning
to
address
complex
challenges
simultaneously.
In
this
article,
we
formulated
through
a
coproduction
process
in
workshops
held
during
the
first
IPCC
Cities
Climate
Science
Conference
Edmonton,
Canada,
March
2018,
series
of
synthesis
statements
on
role,
potential,
research
gaps
nature-based
climate
adaptation
mitigation.
We
interlocking
questions
about
evidence
knowledge
needed
integrating
into
agendas.
elaborate
ways
advance
agenda
by
focusing
coproduction,
indicators
big
data,
novel
financing
models.
With
intend
open
wider
discussion
how
cities
can
effectively
mainstream
mitigate
adapt
negative
effects
change
future
role
science
coproducing
solutions.
Natural hazards and earth system sciences,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
20(1), P. 243 - 270
Published: Jan. 20, 2020
Abstract.
Hydro-meteorological
risks
due
to
natural
hazards
such
as
severe
floods,
storm
surges,
landslides
and
droughts
are
causing
impacts
on
different
sectors
of
society.
Such
expected
become
worse
given
projected
changes
in
climate,
degradation
ecosystems,
population
growth
urbanisation.
In
this
respect,
nature-based
solutions
(NBSs)
have
emerged
effective
means
respond
challenges.
A
NBS
is
a
term
used
for
innovative
that
based
processes
ecosystems
solve
types
societal
environmental
The
present
paper
provides
critical
review
the
literature
concerning
NBSs
hydro-meteorological
risk
reduction
identifies
current
knowledge
gaps
future
research
prospects.
There
has
been
considerable
scientific
publications
topic,
with
more
significant
rise
taking
place
from
2007
onwards.
Hence,
process
presented
starts
by
sourcing
1608
articles
Scopus
1431
Web
Science.
full
analysis
was
performed
146
articles.
confirmed
numerous
advancements
area
achieved
date.
These
already
proven
be
valuable
providing
sustainable,
cost-effective,
multi-purpose
flexible
reduction.
However,
there
still
many
areas
where
further
demonstration
needed
order
promote
their
upscaling
replication
make
them
mainstream
solutions.
BioScience,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
70(6), P. 501 - 514
Published: March 20, 2020
Abstract
Fluvial
riparian
vegetation
(RV)
links
fluvial
and
terrestrial
ecosystems.
It
is
under
significant
pressure
from
anthropogenic
activities,
and,
therefore,
the
management
restoration
of
RV
are
increasingly
important
worldwide.
has
been
investigated
different
perspectives,
so
knowledge
on
its
structure
function
widely
distributed.
An
step
forward
to
convert
existing
into
an
overview
easily
accessible—for
example,
for
use
in
decision-making
management.
We
aim
provide
ecosystem
services
provided
by
adopting
a
structured
approach
identify
services,
describe
their
characteristics,
rank
importance
each
service.
evaluate
service
within
four
main
types
global
perspective
derive
broad
concept.
Subsequently,
we
introduce
guided
framework
based
our
approach.
also
gaps
opportunities
offers
Blue-Green Systems,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
2(1), P. 112 - 136
Published: Jan. 1, 2020
Abstract
Nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
can
protect,
manage
and
restore
natural
or
modified
ecosystems.
They
are
a
multidisciplinary,
integrated
approach
to
address
societal
challenges
some
hazards
effectively
adaptively,
simultaneously
providing
human
well-being
biodiversity
benefits.
NBS
applications
be
easily
noticed
in
circular
cities,
establishing
an
urban
system
that
is
regenerative
accessible.
This
paper
aims
offer
review
on
for
water
management
from
the
literature
relevant
projects
running
within
COST
Action
‘Implementing
nature-based
creating
resourceful
city’.
The
method
used
study
based
detailed
tracking
of
specific
keywords
using
Google
Scholar,
ResearchGate,
Academia.edu,
ScienceDirect
Scopus.
Based
this
review,
three
main
were
identified:
(i)
flood
drought
protection;
(ii)
water-food-energy
nexus;
(iii)
purification.
shows
provide
additional
benefits,
such
as
improving
quality,
increasing
biodiversity,
obtaining
social
co-benefits,
microclimate,
reduction
energy
consumption
by
indoor
climate.
concludes
systemic
change
should
given
higher
priority
preferred
over
conventional
infrastructure.