Co-benefits of nature-based solutions exceed the costs of implementation DOI Creative Commons
Alberto González-García, Ignacio Palomo, Anna Codemo

et al.

Cell Reports Sustainability, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100336 - 100336

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Getting the message right on nature‐based solutions to climate change DOI
Nathalie Seddon, Alison Smith, Pete Smith

et al.

Global Change Biology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 27(8), P. 1518 - 1546

Published: Feb. 1, 2021

Abstract Nature‐based solutions (NbS)—solutions to societal challenges that involve working with nature—have recently gained popularity as an integrated approach can address climate change and biodiversity loss, while supporting sustainable development. Although well‐designed NbS deliver multiple benefits for people nature, much of the recent limelight has been on tree planting carbon sequestration. There are serious concerns this is distracting from need rapidly phase out use fossil fuels protect existing intact ecosystems. also expansion forestry framed a mitigation solution coming at cost rich biodiverse native ecosystems local resource rights. Here, we discuss promise pitfalls framing its current political traction, present recommendations how get message right. We urge policymakers, practitioners researchers consider synergies trade‐offs associated follow four guiding principles enable provide society: (1) not substitute rapid fuels; (2) wide range land in sea, just forests; (3) implemented full engagement consent Indigenous Peoples communities way respects their cultural ecological rights; (4) should be explicitly designed measurable biodiversity. Only by following these guidelines will design robust resilient urgent sustaining nature together, now into future.

Language: Английский

Citations

704

Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: Modelling methods, advantages and limitations DOI Creative Commons
Prashant Kumar, Sisay E. Debele, Jeetendra Sahani

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 784, P. 147058 - 147058

Published: April 16, 2021

Nature-based solutions (NBS) for hydro-meteorological risks (HMRs) reduction and management are becoming increasingly popular, but challenges such as the lack of well-recognised standard methodologies to evaluate their performance upscale implementation remain. We systematically current state-of-the art on models tools that utilised optimum allocation, design efficiency evaluation NBS five HMRs (flooding, droughts, heatwaves, landslides, storm surges coastal erosion). found methods assess complex issue cost-benefits analysis still in development stage they have only been implemented through developed other purposes fluid dynamics micro catchment scale contexts. Of reviewed numerical MIKE-SHE, SWMM (for floods), ParFlow-TREES, ACRU, SIMGRO droughts), WRF, ENVI-met heatwaves), FUNWAVE-TVD, BROOK90 landslides), TELEMAC ADCIRC surges) more flexible effectiveness specific wetlands, ponds, trees, parks, grass, green roof/walls, tree roots, vegetations, coral reefs, mangroves, sea grasses, oyster salt marshes, sandy beaches dunes. conclude capable assessing multiple benefits, particularly cost-effectiveness HMR not readily available. Thus, our synthesis modelling can facilitate selection maximise opportunities refute political hesitation deployment compared with grey also provision a wide range social economic co-benefits. However, there is need bespoke holistically various components from an perspective. Such impact assessment under different scenarios build solid evidence base upscaling replicating NBS.

Language: Английский

Citations

196

Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights DOI Creative Commons
Christian Albert, Mario Brillinger, Paulina Guerrero

et al.

AMBIO, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 50(8), P. 1446 - 1461

Published: Oct. 14, 2020

Nature-based solutions (NBS) find increasing attention as actions to address societal challenges through harnessing ecological processes, yet knowledge gaps exist regarding approaches landscape planning with NBS. This paper aims provide suggestions of how NBS can be conceptualized and applied in practice. We develop a framework for by merging insights from literature case study the Lahn river landscape, Germany. Our relates three key criteria that define NBS, consists six steps planning: Co-define setting, Understand challenges, Create visions scenarios, Assess potential impacts, Develop solution strategies, Realize monitor. Its implementation is guided five principles, namely Place-specificity, Evidence base, Integration, Equity, Transdisciplinarity. Drawing on empirical study, we suggest suitable methods checklist supportive procedures applying Taken together, our facilitate provides further towards mainstreaming.

Language: Английский

Citations

171

Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review DOI Creative Commons
Luís Cea, Pierfranco Costabile

Hydrology, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 9(3), P. 50 - 50

Published: March 18, 2022

The modelling and management of flood risk in urban areas are increasingly recognized as global challenges. complexity these issues is a consequence the existence several distinct sources risk, including not only fluvial, tidal coastal flooding, but also exposure to runoff local drainage failure, various strategies that can be proposed. high degree vulnerability characterizes such expected increase future due effects climate change, growth population living cities, densification. An increasing awareness socio-economic losses environmental impact flooding clearly reflected recent expansion number studies related sometimes within framework adaptation change. goal current paper provide general review advances flood-risk management, while exploring perspectives fields research.

Language: Английский

Citations

152

An overview of monitoring methods for assessing the performance of nature-based solutions against natural hazards DOI Creative Commons
Prashant Kumar, Sisay E. Debele, Jeetendra Sahani

et al.

Earth-Science Reviews, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 217, P. 103603 - 103603

Published: March 17, 2021

To bring to fruition the capability of nature-based solutions (NBS) in mitigating hydro-meteorological risks (HMRs) and facilitate their widespread uptake require a consolidated knowledge-base related monitoring methods, efficiency, functioning ecosystem services they provide. We attempt fill this knowledge gap by reviewing compiling existing scientific literature on including ground-based measurements (e.g. gauging stations, wireless sensor network) remote sensing observations from topographic LiDAR, multispectral radar sensors) that have been used and/or can be relevant monitor performance NBS against five HMRs: floods, droughts, heatwaves, landslides, storm surges coastal erosion. These allow mapping impacts specific events. found selection application methods mostly rely particular being monitored, resource availability time, budget, space) type HMRs. No standalone method currently exists its broadest view. However, equipments, tools technologies developed for other purposes, such as atmospheric observations, applied accurately mitigate also focused capabilities passive active sensing, pointing out associated opportunities difficulties application. conclude advancement airborne satellite-based technology has signified leap systematic performance, well provided robust way spatial temporal comparison intervention versus absence. This improved measurement support evaluation uncertainty scepticism selecting over artificially built concrete structures or grey approaches addressing questions precariousness. Remote technical developments, however, take time shift toward state operational readiness progress place green growth rate, changes effectiveness through time). More research is required develop holistic approach, which could routinely continually large scale intervention. increase ecological socio-economic benefits NBS, create high levels acceptance confidence overcoming potential implementations.

Language: Английский

Citations

145

Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting DOI
Heather Keith, Michael Vardon,

Carl Obst

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 769, P. 144341 - 144341

Published: Jan. 20, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

125

Climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation DOI Open Access
Fang Wang, Jean Damascene Harindintwali, Ke Wei

et al.

The Innovation Geoscience, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 1(1), P. 100015 - 100015

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

<p>The sustainability of life on Earth is under increasing threat due to human-induced climate change. This perilous change in the Earth's caused by increases carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases atmosphere, primarily emissions associated with burning fossil fuels. Over next two three decades, effects change, such as heatwaves, wildfires, droughts, storms, floods, are expected worsen, posing greater risks human health global stability. These trends call for implementation mitigation adaptation strategies. Pollution environmental degradation exacerbate existing problems make people nature more susceptible In this review, we examine current state from different perspectives. We summarize evidence Earth’s spheres, discuss emission pathways drivers analyze impact health. also explore strategies highlight key challenges reversing adapting change.</p>

Language: Английский

Citations

118

The European Union roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions: A review DOI

Clive Davies,

Wendy Y. Chen, Giovanni Sanesi

et al.

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 121, P. 49 - 67

Published: April 14, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

107

Nature-based solutions addressing the water-energy-food nexus: Review of theoretical concepts and urban case studies DOI Creative Commons
Pedro N. Carvalho, David C. Finger, Fabio Masi

et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 338, P. 130652 - 130652

Published: Jan. 24, 2022

An increasing world population is projected to increase water, energy and food requirements, three vital resources for humankind. Projected climate change impacts will aggravate water availability, as well flood risks, especially in urban areas. Nature-based solutions (NBS) have been identified key concepts defuse the expected tensions within Water-Energy-Food (W-E-F) nexus due their multiple benefits. In this paper, authors outlined theories concepts, analyzed real-life case studies, discussed potential of NBS address future W-E-F nexus. For purpose, we performed a systematic literature review on that nexus, summarized 19 representative studies identify current knowledge gaps challenges. The quantitative qualitative data was used differentiate discuss direct indirect benefits study further expanded challenges implementation highlighted growing possibilities context circularity planning. It concluded identified, but effects not in-depth. Moreover, indicators are mostly single-purpose multipurpose, required fully characterize holistically. Overall, there need adopt systemic thinking promote multipurpose design NBS.

Language: Английский

Citations

77

Nature-based solutions can help reduce the impact of natural hazards: A global analysis of NBS case studies DOI Creative Commons
Sisay E. Debele, Laura S. Leo, Prashant Kumar

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 902, P. 165824 - 165824

Published: July 30, 2023

The knowledge derived from successful case studies can act as a driver for the implementation and upscaling of nature-based solutions (NBS). This work reviewed 547 to gain an overview NBS practices their role in reducing adverse impact natural hazards climate change. majority (60 %) are situated Europe compared with rest world where they poorly represented. Of studies, 33 % were green followed by hybrid (31 %), mixed (27 blue (10 approaches. Approximately half (48 these interventions implemented urban (24 river lake ecosystems. Regarding scale intervention, 92 operationalised at local (50 watershed (46 scales while very few (4 landscape scale. results also showed that 63 have been used deal hazards, change, loss biodiversity, remaining 37 address socio-economic challenges (e.g., economic development, social justice, inequality, cohesion). Around 88 implementations supported policies national level 12 regional levels. Most analysed cases contributed Sustainable Development Goals 15, 13, 6, biodiversity strategic goals B D. Case highlighted co-benefits NBS: 64 them environmental improving air water qualities, carbon storage) 36 (9 co-benefits. synthesis helps bridge gap between scientists, policymakers, practitioners, which allow adopting disaster risk reduction change adaptation enhance preference decision-making processes.

Language: Английский

Citations

74