Umetni podvodni grebeni med valom sprememb in nadaljevanjem okoljske degradacije DOI Creative Commons
Jerneja Penca,

Irena Fonda,

GT Pecl

et al.

Alternator, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 14, 2024

Planning hydrological restoration of coastal wetlands: Key model considerations and solutions DOI Creative Commons
Alice J. Twomey, Karinna Nunez, Joel A. Carr

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 915, P. 169881 - 169881

Published: Jan. 6, 2024

The hydrological restoration of coastal wetlands is an emerging approach for mitigating and adapting to climate change enhancing ecosystem services such as improved water quality biodiversity. This paper synthesises current knowledge on selecting appropriate modelling approaches projects. selection a based project-specific factors, costs, risks, uncertainties, aligns with the overall project objectives. We provide guidance model selection, emphasising use simpler less expensive when appropriate, identifying situations models may not be required managers make informed decisions. recognises supports widespread in by bridging gap between science practices. It underscores significance objectives, budget, available data offers decision-making frameworks, decision trees, aid matching methods specific outcomes.

Language: Английский

Citations

16

Barriers and enablers for upscaling coastal restoration DOI Creative Commons
Agustı́n Sánchez-Arcilla, Iván Cáceres, Xavier Le Roux

et al.

Nature-Based Solutions, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 2, P. 100032 - 100032

Published: Sept. 20, 2022

Coastal restoration is often distrusted and, at best, implemented small scales, which hampers its potential for coastal adaptation. Present technical, economic and management barriers stem from sectoral poorly coordinated local interventions, are insufficiently monitored maintained, precluding the upscaling required to build up confidence in ecosystem restoration. The paper posits that there enough knowledge, technology, financial governance capabilities increasing pace scale of restoration, before onset irreversible degradation. We propose a systemic integrates Nature based Solutions (NbS) building blocks, provide climate-resilient services improved biodiversity curb result should be reduction risks decarbonised protection, same time increases blue carbon. discuss enablers adaptation-through-restoration plans, on vulnerable archetypes, such as deltas, estuaries, lagoons bays. These connectivity accommodation space, enhanced resilience under climatic human pressures. concludes with review interconnections between dimensions discusses how fill present implementation gap.

Language: Английский

Citations

39

A roadmap to coastal and marine ecological restoration in Australia DOI Creative Commons
Megan I. Saunders, Toni Cannard, Mibu Fischer

et al.

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 159, P. 103808 - 103808

Published: June 24, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

9

Restoring mangrove biodiversity: can restored mangroves support fish assemblages comparable to natural mangroves over time? DOI Creative Commons
Mark Ram, Marcus Sheaves, Nathan J. Waltham

et al.

Restoration Ecology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 21, 2025

Despite the recent global increase in mangrove restoration efforts, our understanding of outcomes and recovery biodiversity re‐establishing functionality, such as productive fish habitat, is limited due to lack long‐term monitoring. Here, we used a space‐for‐time approach investigate whether restored mangroves attain similar communities natural same age (5–11 years old). Fish forests along Guyana coastline, South America, were sampled using trammel nets collect data compare abundance, species richness, biomass. This study found no notable differences assemblages between ages. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), analysis similarities (ANOSIM), similarity percentage (SIMPER) revealed high overlap composition habitats, age, seasons, diel cycle. There was clear trajectory biomass, which indciates that quickly colonized habitats. Our provides evidence success projects yielding positive ecological benefits habitat. information useful for practitioners when setting goals timelines habitat after restoration.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Restoring blue carbon systems DOI Creative Commons
Daniel A. Friess, Zoë I. Shribman, Milica Stankovic

et al.

Cambridge Prisms Coastal Futures, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 2

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Abstract Mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrasses have experienced extensive historical reduction in extent due to direct indirect effects of anthropogenic land use change. Habitat loss has contributed carbon emissions led foregone opportunities for sequestration, which are disproportionately large high ‘blue carbon’ stocks sequestration rates these coastal ecosystems. As such, there been a rapid increase interest using habitat restoration as climate change mitigation tool. This review shows that efforts able substantially blue stocks, while also having positive impact on various gaseous fluxes. However, increases spatially variable, biophysical factors such geomorphic setting. While potentially hundreds thousands hectares may be biophysically suitable restoration, activities still often conducted at small scales with mixed success. Maximizing potential gains through will require managers planners overcome the myriad socioeconomic governance constraints related tenure, legislation, target setting cost, push projects into locations unsuitable plant colonization.

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Rapid Site Selection to Prioritize Coastal Seascapes for Nature-Based Solutions With Multiple Benefits DOI Creative Commons
Simon J. Pittman, Kostantinos A. Stamoulis,

Marina Antonopoulou

et al.

Frontiers in Marine Science, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 9

Published: April 29, 2022

Coastal seascapes are productive and diverse land-sea systems that provide many valuable benefits yet increasingly threatened by human activity. Scaling up of nature-based solutions (NbS) to effectively protect, sustainably manage, restore coastal is urgently required for mitigation climate change biodiversity loss while also providing socio-economic benefits. Evidence-based site selection an important first step improve the outcomes avoid negative impacts when prioritizing NbS investments at national level. We developed a spatially explicit, integrative culturally relevant ecosystem-based process identify portfolio consideration in United Arab Emirates (UAE). The primary goal was rank planning units based on potential action, positive impact people. multi-criteria site-selection framework provided rapid, transparent, repeatable scalable tool. highest weightings were assigned blue carbon storage value, conservation features, local stakeholder preferred areas. Spatial proxies people represented population density accessibility seascapes, relative tourism recreation potential, importance fish habitat fishing grounds food security. Participatory mapping knowledge review existing data ensured both qualitative quantitative criteria reliable, up-to-date locally relevant. Two distinct clusters high suitability identified Abu Dhabi region four along north-western coast UAE. Most sites located outside marine protected Alternative spatial scenarios without bias underscored through participatory highlighted additional priority future scaling-up NbS. A corridor medium across offers designing well-connected accelerate boost synergistic increase resilience. provides rapid tool integrates global open access range scales with great transferability other regions worldwide.

Language: Английский

Citations

28

Greater Consideration of Animals Will Enhance Coastal Restoration Outcomes DOI Creative Commons
Michael Sievers, Christopher J. Brown, Christina A. Buelow

et al.

BioScience, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 72(11), P. 1088 - 1098

Published: Sept. 13, 2022

As efforts to restore coastal habitats accelerate, it is critical that investments are targeted most effectively mitigate and reverse habitat loss its impacts on biodiversity. One likely but largely overlooked impediment effective restoration of habitat-forming organisms failing explicitly consider non-habitat-forming animals in planning, implementation, monitoring. These can greatly enhance or degrade ecosystem function, persistence, resilience. Bivalves, for instance, reduce sulfide stress seagrass increase drought tolerance saltmarsh vegetation, whereas megaherbivores detrimentally overgraze improve seed germination, depending the context. Therefore, understanding when, why, how directly manipulate support outcomes. In this expanded approach, we provide a conceptual framework, incorporating lessons from structured decision-making, describe potential actions could lead better outcomes using case studies illustrate practical approaches.

Language: Английский

Citations

20

Ecosystem Service Trajectories in Restored Coastal Habitats DOI
Dana Lanceman, Mariana Mayer‐Pinto, William Glamore

et al.

Global Change Biology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 31(3)

Published: March 1, 2025

Ecosystem restoration is urgently needed to restore, maintain, or increase valued ecosystem services provided by natural habitats. However, the provision of in restored habitats, comparison natural, undegraded and time required for them be generated, uncertain. Here, first coastal (or our knowledge, any) ecosystems, we systematically outline why how characterize pathways service recovery following restoration. Using real-world theoretical examples, mainly from seven key components trajectories. These are baseline rate variability provisioning, trend type, direction, rate, equivalence provisioning. provide novel insights into development values over time, their use can help planning on-ground projects monitoring regimes, valuing services, determining success.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Contrasting effects in tidal inundation under varying sea levels on the ecological structure and functions of tropical marsh ecosystems DOI Creative Commons
Cécile Vulliet, Jack Koci, Marcus Sheaves

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 980, P. 179500 - 179500

Published: May 2, 2025

Coastal managers continue to be confronted with making management decisions few data available and insight of the outcomes. Practical tools that can used inform on effects different scenarios changes are particularly important assist decision-making. This study has applied a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) investigate contrasting Sea Level Rise (SLR) reduction in tidal inundation tropical wetland mosaic including saltmarshes, mangroves, intertidal mudflats. We investigated: 1) habitability site for vegetation under associated inundation; 2) probability ecological values export crab zoea blue carbon supported scenarios. The highlights that, without ability adjust future SLR scenarios, saltmarshes here likely lost open water, scenario 0.8 m SLR. Tidal decreased mangrove cover but increased terrestrial subtidal herbaceous saltmarshes. is positively affect value decreases likelihood holding high zoeae saltmarsh areas. In contrast, declined both values. findings highlight importance "whole-of-system" approach assessing inundation. Focusing only one habitat single targeted may structure functions other components coastal ecosystem mosaic. BBNs useful summarise preliminary assessments potential ecosystems, which make most informed decision conserve restore transitional

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Point of (no) return? Vegetation structure and diversity of restored mangroves in Sulawesi, Indonesia, 14–16 years on DOI Creative Commons
Rignolda Djamaluddin, Marco Fusi,

Brama Djabar

et al.

Restoration Ecology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 31(7)

Published: June 25, 2023

Mangrove forests, benefitting millions of people, experience significant degradation. Global recognition the urgency halting and reversing this trend have initiated numerous restoration activities. Restoration success is typically evaluated by estimating mangrove survival area restored, while diversity structure vegetation, as proxies for functional are rarely considered. Here we assess species richness along sea‐landward transects evaluate outcomes comparing number species, relative abundance, biomass, diameter, canopy cover in “Monoculture Reforestation”, “Mixed Species Regeneration” adjacent “Reference” forest stands, 14 (Tiwoho site) 16 years (Likupang after activities took place. In Reforestation” plots, still closely reflected original actions, with only one two “new” having established among originally densely planted “foundation” species. contrast, plots were more similar to terms tree diameter coverage, but number, abundance biomass lower. The trajectory suggests their similarity stands will increase over time, whereas such “smooth” transition unlikely happen foreseeable future. Implementing frequent small‐scale disturbances restored management would stand diversity, accelerating establishment a natural, likely resilient forest.

Language: Английский

Citations

9