Journal of Vertebrate Biology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
73(23032)
Published: June 13, 2023
In
the
Philippines,
trade
in
non-native
aquatic
organisms
for
ornamental
purposes
and
food
consumption
has
been
responsible
their
large-scale
importation
since
1940s.
These
organisms,
especially
invasive
fishes,
represent
one
of
major
threats
to
global
biodiversity.
However,
little
is
known
potential
they
pose
native
species
ecosystems
where
a
sound
risk
analysis
strategy
needed
control
manage
species.
As
case
study,
nonnative
freshwater
fish
species,
both
extant
horizon,
were
screened
with
Aquatic
Species
Invasiveness
Screening
Kit
(AS-ISK)
being
or
becoming
Lake
Taal
–
volcanic
crater
lake
conservation
value.
Of
45
(13
32
horizon),
68.9%
91.1%
ranked
as
high
very
risk,
respectively
under
current
future
climate
conditions.
This
which
provided
evidence
that
led
Philippines
government
adopt
AS-ISK
decision-support
tool
identifying
potentially
other
water
bodies
country,
highlights
need
comprehensive
management
avoid
introductions
mitigate
adverse
impacts
from
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
99(4), P. 1357 - 1390
Published: March 18, 2024
ABSTRACT
Standardised
terminology
in
science
is
important
for
clarity
of
interpretation
and
communication.
In
invasion
–
a
dynamic
rapidly
evolving
discipline
the
proliferation
technical
has
lacked
standardised
framework
its
development.
The
result
convoluted
inconsistent
usage
terminology,
with
various
discrepancies
descriptions
damage
interventions.
A
therefore
needed
clear,
universally
applicable,
consistent
to
promote
more
effective
communication
across
researchers,
stakeholders,
policymakers.
Inconsistencies
stem
from
exponential
increase
scientific
publications
on
patterns
processes
biological
invasions
authored
by
experts
disciplines
countries
since
1990s,
as
well
legislators
policymakers
focusing
practical
applications,
regulations,
management
resources.
Aligning
standardising
stakeholders
remains
challenge
science.
Here,
we
review
evaluate
multiple
terms
used
(e.g.
‘non‐native’,
‘alien’,
‘invasive’
or
‘invader’,
‘exotic’,
‘non‐indigenous’,
‘naturalised’,
‘pest’)
propose
simplified
terminology.
streamlined
translate
into
28
other
languages
based
(
i
)
denoting
species
transported
beyond
their
natural
biogeographic
range,
ii
‘established
non‐native’,
i.e.
those
non‐native
that
have
established
self‐sustaining
populations
new
location(s)
wild,
iii
‘invasive
non‐native’
recently
spread
are
spreading
invaded
range
actively
passively
without
human
mediation.
We
also
highlight
importance
conceptualising
‘spread’
classifying
invasiveness
‘impact’
management.
Finally,
protocol
dispersal
mechanism,
origin,
population
status,
iv
impact.
Collectively
introducing
present
aims
facilitate
collaboration
species.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
30(5)
Published: May 1, 2024
Biological
invasions
pose
a
rapidly
expanding
threat
to
the
persistence,
functioning
and
service
provisioning
of
ecosystems
globally,
socio-economic
interests.
The
stages
successful
are
driven
by
same
mechanism
that
underlies
adaptive
changes
across
species
in
general-via
natural
selection
on
intraspecific
variation
traits
influence
survival
reproductive
performance
(i.e.,
fitness).
Surprisingly,
however,
rapid
progress
field
invasion
science
has
resulted
predominance
species-level
approaches
(such
as
deny
lists),
often
irrespective
theory,
local
adaptation
other
population-level
processes
govern
invasions.
To
address
these
issues,
we
analyse
non-native
dynamics
at
population
level
employing
database
European
freshwater
macroinvertebrate
time
series,
investigate
spreading
speed,
abundance
impact
assessments
among
populations.
Our
findings
reveal
substantial
variability
speed
trends
within
between
biogeographic
regions,
indicating
levels
invasiveness
differ
markedly.
Discrepancies
inconsistencies
risk
screenings
real
data
were
also
identified,
highlighting
inherent
challenges
accurately
assessing
effects
through
assessments.
In
recognition
importance
assessments,
urge
shift
invasive
management
frameworks,
which
should
account
for
different
populations
their
environmental
context.
Adopting
an
adaptive,
region-specific
population-focused
approach
is
imperative,
considering
diverse
ecological
contexts
varying
degrees
susceptibility.
Such
could
improve
refine
while
promoting
mechanistic
understandings
risks
impacts,
thereby
enabling
development
more
effective
conservation
strategies.
Standardized
terminology
in
science
is
important
for
clarity
of
interpretation
and
communication.
In
invasion
—
a
dynamic
quickly
evolving
discipline
the
rapid
proliferation
technical
has
lacked
standardized
framework
its
language
development.
The
result
convoluted
inconsistent
usage
terminology,
with
various
discrepancies
descriptions
damages
interventions.
A
therefore
needed
clear,
universally
applicable,
consistent
to
promote
more
effective
communication
across
researchers,
stakeholders,
policymakers.
Inconsistencies
stem
from
exponential
increase
scientific
publications
on
patterns
processes
biological
invasions
authored
by
experts
disciplines
countries
since
1990s,
as
well
legislators
policymakers
focusing
practical
applications,
regulations,
management
resources.
Aligning
standardizing
stakeholders
remains
prevailing
challenge
science.
Here,
we
review
evaluate
multiple
terms
used
(e.g.
'non-native',
'alien',
'invasive'
or
'invader',
'exotic',
'non-indigenous',
'naturalized,
'pest')
propose
simplified
terminology.
streamlined
translate
into
28
other
languages
based
(i)
denoting
species
transported
beyond
their
natural
biogeographic
range,
(ii)
'established
non-native',
i.e.
those
non-native
that
have
established
self-sustaining
populations
new
location(s)
wild,
(iii)
'invasive
non-native'
recently
spread
are
spreading
rapidly
invaded
range
actively
passively
without
human
mediation.
We
also
highlight
importance
conceptualizing
'spread'
classifying
invasiveness
'impact'
management.
Finally,
protocol
(1)
dispersal
mechanism,
(2)
origin,
(3)
population
status,
(4)
impact.
Collectively
introducing
present
aims
facilitate
collaboration
species.
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
1445(1), P. 012043 - 012043
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Abstract
This
article
discusses
the
reduction
of
microplastics
through
waste
management
in
Indonesia,
focusing
on
urgency
issue,
research
methodology,
and
obtained
results.
The
this
is
high
due
to
negative
impacts
ecosystems
human
health.
Microplastics,
plastic
particles
less
than
5
millimeters
size,
have
contaminated
water
bodies
biota
that
become
food
sources,
posing
health
risks
exposure
contaminants
such
as
BPA
phthalates
disrupt
hormonal
functions.
methodology
used
qualitative
with
an
in-depth
phenomenological
approach,
involving
interviews
focused
group
discussions
various
stakeholders,
including
government
officials,
researchers,
environmental
activists,
local
communities.
Secondary
data
were
from
documents,
previous
reports,
journal
articles,
news
media.
Data
analysis
was
conducted
using
methods
Miles,
Huberman,
Saldaña,
reduction,
presentation,
conclusion
drawing/verification,
validity
tested
source
triangulation.
results
indicate
current
policies
need
be
strengthened
effectively
address
issue
microplastics.
Stricter
more
specific
regulations
are
required
reduce
production
release
consumer
industrial
products.
Additionally,
public
education
dangers
importance
recycling
key
reducing
volume
plastics
end
up
environment.
Collaboration
between
government,
communities,
businesses
technological
initiatives
Surplus
application
FoodCycle
Indonesia
program
shows
great
potential
supporting
Sustainable
Development
Goals
[SDGs]
related
Zero
Hunger,
Responsible
Consumption
Production,
Climate
Action.
approach
not
only
relevant
for
city
Medan
but
can
also
adapted
by
other
regions
facing
similar
issues.
Biology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
14(2), P. 189 - 189
Published: Feb. 12, 2025
The
spread
of
non-native
species
plays
a
substantial
role
in
the
designation
as
invasive,
yet
determination
and
measurement
non-native-species
is
challenging,
particularly
for
fishes,
which
are
limited
by
aquatic
connectivity.
Spread
has
been
quantified
fishes
variety
ways
exact
methods
vary
region
taxonomic
group.
In
this
study,
we
fish
peninsular
Florida
used
life
history
traits
to
understand
what
factors
contribute
rate
at
spread.
Using
statistical
analyses,
found
that
fast
spreaders
tend
have
larger
body
size,
narrow
diet,
shorter
time
hatch,
greater
salinity
tolerance,
higher
fecundity.
However,
some
variables
like
parental
care,
egg
diameter,
reproductive
guild
were
same
or
very
similar
across
all
established
included
analyses.
Predicting
whether
an
will
quickly
slowly
may
be
more
challenging
than
predicting
introduced
establish,
there
support
regions
use
risk
assessment
process.
Biological Invasions,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
26(4), P. 1033 - 1044
Published: Jan. 8, 2024
Abstract
Invasive
species
represent
a
severe
threat
for
ecosystem
health
worldwide.
With
increasing
global
trade
and
ongoing
climate
change,
monitoring
non-native
their
hotspots
of
potential
spread
is
becoming
increasingly
important.
ants
are
one
the
most
problematic
groups
organisms
costing
billions
dollars
year
globally
to
control.
Therefore,
emerging
ant
invasions
require
more
focused
engagement
assess
extent,
effective
measures
prevent
invasive
can
be
time
consuming
expensive
implement.
In
addition
places
with
high
commercial
traffic,
greenhouses
as
they
entry
points
invasions.
However,
role
in
still
understudied.
this
study,
an
extensive
survey
zoos
botanical
gardens
Hungary
was
conducted
search
species.
The
five
found
surveys
additional
two
known
from
were
then
screened
risk
invasiveness
country
under
both
current
predicted
conditions.
Three
pose
considerable
conservation
economic
Hungary,
already
present
wild.
Increased
other
heated
premises
presence
targeted
chemical
eradication
needed
spread.
screening
method
employed
study
applied
wide
range
terrestrial
animal
taxa,
thereby
providing
basis
developing
prevention
control
strategies
against
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
34(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract
Non‐native
species
(NNS)
might
become
invasive
and
threaten
biodiversity,
economy
public
health.
Therefore,
it
is
essential
that
their
invasiveness
risk
be
quantified
to
support
conservation
measures.
The
Azores,
located
in
the
mid‐northern
Atlantic,
crossroad
of
macroalgal
native
distributions
also
present
almost
three
times
global
ratio
macroalgae
reported
as
NNS.
Aquatic
Species
Invasiveness
Screening
Kit,
a
decision‐support
tool
consisting
49
questions
for
Basic
Risk
Assessment
(BRA)
six
Climate
Change
(CCA),
was
applied
42
marine
classified
NNS
Azores.
results
indicate
21
pose
medium
becoming
invasive,
15
high
under
current
climate
conditions
(BRA
scores
only).
combined
BRA
+
CCA
show
Laurencia
dendroidea
poses
instead
risk.
Thirty‐three
Rhodophyta
were
screened,
with
10
11
CCA)
All
four
Chlorophyta
ranked
Only
one
five
Ochrophyta
risk,
namely
Rugulopteryx
okamurae
,
most
European
waters.
High‐risk
are
all
islands,
likely
spread
by
continuous
maritime
traffic
between
islands.
Six
high‐risk
restricted
single
islands
scores),
efforts
should
made
contain
further
expansion.
Asparagopsis
armata
introduced
Europe
1920s,
only
Conservation
measures
prevention,
monitoring
control
proposed
different
including
regulation
introduction
pathways,
prospection
areas
invasion,
screening,
eradication
containment
involvement
stakeholders
workers
recommended.
Management of Biological Invasions,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(4), P. 593 - 608
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Score-based
decision-support
tools
are
increasingly
used
to
identify
potentially
invasive
non-native
species
as
part
of
the
risk
screening
(initial
identification)
component
analysis.Amongst
these
Weed
Risk
Assessment
(WRA)
and
its
derivatives,
e.g.
Aquatic
Species
Invasiveness
Screening
Kit
(AS-ISK),
which
have
been
extensively
on
a
large
variety
terrestrial
aquatic
plants
animals
worldwide.In
this
paper,
correction
is
made
previous
guidance
use
two
separate
thresholds
risk-rank
species,
i.e.
one
for
current
climate
conditions
(basic
assessment:
BRA
threshold)
future
(BRA
+
change
BRA+CCA
threshold).Re-evaluation
practice
reveals
that,
avoid
incorrect
risk-ranking
only
threshold
should
be
in
all
applications
WRAtype
toolkits
that
include
set
climate-change
questions
-at
present,
involves
AS-ISK
newly
released
Terrestrial
Animal
(TAS-ISK).As
result
revised
guidance,
published
studies
containing
date
reviewed
here,
where
approrpiate
corrected
ranks
provided
were
risk-ranked
using
threshold.Corrections
also
whenever
applicable
errors
or
based
reviewed.