Processes for the valorization of microalgal biomass cultivates in piggery wastewater DOI Creative Commons

Elena María Rojo de Benito

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Piggery wastewater generation has become an environmental problem which must be solved by managing the residue through appropriate treatment.One promising technology is use of photobioreactors where microalgae and bacteria act symbiotically to remove nutrients, allows reduce costs in treatment production using as culture media.In this process, a valuable biomass generated that can used produce several components bioproducts.However, most algal such proteins carbohydrates are found within cell wall should disrupted extract them trying cause low degradation solubilized considering presence pollutants.So, thesis focusses on valorization grown piggery different technologies.Likewise, economic viability some proposed processes was studied.Techno-economic analysis show agricultural products sustainably produced from wastewater.The method harvesting resulted critical point obtaining 4.5 times more concentrated biostimulant with centrifugation than membranes.However, centrifuges led great expense due high cost equipment its electricity requirements, resulting final 343 €/m 3 vs 66 membranes.Comparing 1ha crop, centrifuge or membrane lower commercial product (22.1% 48.1% respectively).The membranes for allowed construction economically viable plants capable operating at capacity distributing biostimulants over greater distances centrifuges.A life cycle assessment showed 30% impact (global warming (GW) 217 kg CO2 eq/ha) instead centrifugation.The amount required crops when used, also relevant transportation, being favourable distance 321 km.As alternative, extraction biopesticides before evaluated.The calculated were 0.35 €/L 2.12€/L centrifuge, but higher inversion complex process producing only biostimulants.

Language: Английский

Algal Membrane Bioreactors for Efficient Removal of Emerging Contaminants and Resource Recovery: Current Advances and Future Outlook DOI

Neha Saini,

Paramjeet Dhull, Mamta Pal

et al.

Journal of environmental chemical engineering, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(3), P. 112669 - 112669

Published: April 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

15

Microalgae bioinputs as disruptive technology for a sustainable agriculture: a systematic and bibliometric review DOI
Rafael Carvalho Nogueira da Gama, Jackeline de Siqueira Castro, Bianca Barros Marangon

et al.

Journal of environmental chemical engineering, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 13(2), P. 116034 - 116034

Published: March 3, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Advancements in membrane modifications for enhanced microalgae harvesting: A comprehensive review DOI
Zubair Hashmi, Ibrahim Maina Idriss, Juliana Zaini

et al.

Separation and Purification Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 131012 - 131012

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Processes for the valorization of microalgal biomass cultivates in piggery wastewater DOI Creative Commons

Elena María Rojo de Benito

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Piggery wastewater generation has become an environmental problem which must be solved by managing the residue through appropriate treatment.One promising technology is use of photobioreactors where microalgae and bacteria act symbiotically to remove nutrients, allows reduce costs in treatment production using as culture media.In this process, a valuable biomass generated that can used produce several components bioproducts.However, most algal such proteins carbohydrates are found within cell wall should disrupted extract them trying cause low degradation solubilized considering presence pollutants.So, thesis focusses on valorization grown piggery different technologies.Likewise, economic viability some proposed processes was studied.Techno-economic analysis show agricultural products sustainably produced from wastewater.The method harvesting resulted critical point obtaining 4.5 times more concentrated biostimulant with centrifugation than membranes.However, centrifuges led great expense due high cost equipment its electricity requirements, resulting final 343 €/m 3 vs 66 membranes.Comparing 1ha crop, centrifuge or membrane lower commercial product (22.1% 48.1% respectively).The membranes for allowed construction economically viable plants capable operating at capacity distributing biostimulants over greater distances centrifuges.A life cycle assessment showed 30% impact (global warming (GW) 217 kg CO2 eq/ha) instead centrifugation.The amount required crops when used, also relevant transportation, being favourable distance 321 km.As alternative, extraction biopesticides before evaluated.The calculated were 0.35 €/L 2.12€/L centrifuge, but higher inversion complex process producing only biostimulants.

Language: Английский

Citations

0