Landscape and Urban Planning,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
220, P. 104335 - 104335
Published: Dec. 18, 2021
Nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
are
a
promising
and
innovative
approach
to
address
multiple
sustainability
challenges
faced
by
cities.
Yet,
NBS
not
integrated
into
mainstream
urban
development
practices.
Based
on
qualitative
comparative
case
study
of
Germany,
Hungary,
the
Netherlands,
Spain,
Sweden,
United
Kingdom,
this
shows
how
barriers
mainstreaming
shaped
structural
conditions
in
infrastructure
regimes,
which
offers
an
improved,
context-sensitive
understanding
why
such
persist.
We
identify
underlying
shaping
seven
key
NBS:
limited
collaborative
governance,
knowledge,
data
awareness
challenges,
low
private
sector
engagement,
competition
over
space,
insufficient
policy
development,
implementation
enforcement,
public
resources,
challenging
citizen
engagement.
This
also
advances
regimes
as
complex,
heterogeneous
systems,
made
up
different
functional
domains
that
define
space
available
for
innovations.
Importantly,
our
comparison
reveals
similar
planning
processes
caused
across
countries.
For
example,
perceived
causes
engagement
environmental
lack
resources
support
participation
NIMBY-ism
Netherlands.
Our
findings
stress
importance
moving
beyond
'silver
bullet'-type
approaches
addressing
barriers,
towards
systemic
but
responses,
tailored
specific
regimes.
systematic
their
can
help
both
scholars
practitioners
pathways
innovation.
Cities,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
95, P. 102483 - 102483
Published: Oct. 24, 2019
Cities
face
increasing
environmental,
social
and
economic
challenges
that
together
threaten
the
resilience
of
urban
areas
residents
who
live
work
there.
These
include
chronic
stresses
acute
shocks,
amplified
by
climate
change
impacts.
Nature-based
solutions
have
emerged
as
a
concept
for
integrating
ecosystem-based
approaches
to
address
range
societal
challenges.
directly
contribute
increased
resilience.
However,
implementing
nature-based
is
inherently
complex,
given
ecosystem
services,
their
multi-functionality
trade-offs
between
functions,
across
temporal
spatial
scales.
Urban
planning
can
play
substantial
role
support
implementation
manage
conflicts,
well
how
equity
dimensions
are
considered.
This
paper
presents
framework
guides
application
solutions'
implementation,
addressing
key
temporal,
spatial,
functional
aspects.
The
highlights
questions,
supporting
information
required
these
underpin
inclusion
We
find
while
substantially,
there
continuing
gaps
in
anthropocentric
processes
give
voice
non-human
nature.
Land Use Policy,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
100, P. 104898 - 104898
Published: July 17, 2020
Nature-based
Solutions
(NBS)
are
increasingly
promoted
to
support
sustainable
and
resilient
urban
planning.
However,
design
planning
NBS
targeted
at
the
needs
of
local
context
require
knowledge
about
causal
relationships
between
NBS,
ecosystem
services
(ES)
challenges
(UC)
This
paper
aims
contributing
this
knowledge,
by
systematically
identifying
nexuses
(i.e.
qualitative
links)
UC,
ES
describing
plausible
relationships.
A
conceptual
UC-ES-NBS
criteria
framework
was
built,
used
guide
a
two-step
systematic
literature
review
on
current
UC
supply
NBS.
followed
non-systematic
review,
which
complemented
previous
one
unveiling
gaps
biophysical
social
processes
attributes
specific
classes
depend.
The
also
identify
additional
identified
18
58
sub-challenges,
illustrated
were
more
studied,
according
type
environmental
socio-economic
contexts.
led
development
an
classification,
supported
identification
UC-ES
ES-NBS
nexuses,
analysed
classified
into
four
groups
relationship.
For
as
direct
relationship,
main
depend
pointed
out.
Relationships
ES,
processes,
represented
in
form
network
diagrams.
Our
results
can
be
policies
aimed
mainstreaming
basis
further
understand
Land,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
9(12), P. 525 - 525
Published: Dec. 16, 2020
Green
infrastructure
is
a
strategically
planned
network
of
natural
and
semi-natural
areas,
including
green
blue
spaces
other
ecosystems,
designed
managed
to
deliver
wide
range
ecosystem
services
at
various
scales.
Apart
from
the
ecological
functions,
infrastructure,
as
planning
tool,
contributes
social
economic
benefits,
leading
achievement
sustainable,
resilient,
inclusive
competitive
urban
areas.
Despite
recent
developments,
there
still
no
consensus
among
researchers
practitioners
regarding
concept
well
its
implementation
approaches,
which
makes
it
often
difficult
for
planners
professionals
in
field
develop
robust
some
parts
world.
To
address
this
issue,
an
integrative
literature
review
was
conducted
identify
principles
should
be
acknowledged
spatial
practices
promote
sustainability
resilience.
As
result
review,
most
common
eight
were
selected—connectivity,
multifunctionality,
applicability,
integration,
diversity,
multiscale,
governance,
continuity.
These
intend
simplify
development
use
by
different
academic
organizations
provide
more
defined
model
sustainable
landscape
management
order
help
decision
makers
during
conceptualization
infrastructure.
AMBIO,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
50(8), P. 1446 - 1461
Published: Oct. 14, 2020
Nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
find
increasing
attention
as
actions
to
address
societal
challenges
through
harnessing
ecological
processes,
yet
knowledge
gaps
exist
regarding
approaches
landscape
planning
with
NBS.
This
paper
aims
provide
suggestions
of
how
NBS
can
be
conceptualized
and
applied
in
practice.
We
develop
a
framework
for
by
merging
insights
from
literature
case
study
the
Lahn
river
landscape,
Germany.
Our
relates
three
key
criteria
that
define
NBS,
consists
six
steps
planning:
Co-define
setting,
Understand
challenges,
Create
visions
scenarios,
Assess
potential
impacts,
Develop
solution
strategies,
Realize
monitor.
Its
implementation
is
guided
five
principles,
namely
Place-specificity,
Evidence
base,
Integration,
Equity,
Transdisciplinarity.
Drawing
on
empirical
study,
we
suggest
suitable
methods
checklist
supportive
procedures
applying
Taken
together,
our
facilitate
provides
further
towards
mainstreaming.
Journal of Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
289, P. 112371 - 112371
Published: April 10, 2021
Obtaining
public
and/or
private
finance
for
upscaling
urban
nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
is
a
key
barrier
reaching
sustainability
goals,
including
climate
mitigation
and
adaptation.
We
carry
out
systematic
review
of
the
academic
literature
to
understand
barriers
corresponding
strategies
financing
NBS.
First,
we
report
on
specific
challenges
found
NBS
uptake
in
four
ecological
domains:
buildings,
facades
roofs;
green
space
(parks,
trees);
allotment
gardens
(including
agriculture);
green-blue
infrastructure.
Across
domains,
identify
two
overarching
finance:
(1)
coordination
between
financiers
(2)
integration
benefits
into
valuation
accounting
methods.
discuss
that
address
these
barriers;
here,
things
stand
out.
One,
there
large
variety
does
not
yet
allow
an
integrated
framework
Two,
aimed
at
coordinating
public/private
generally
look
ways
encourage
actors
(real
estate
developers,
residents)
benefit
privately
from
provide
co-financing.
visualize
our
findings
enabling
(public
private)