Soil Categorization and Liquefaction Prediction Using Deep Learning and Ensemble Learning Algorithms DOI
Sufyan Ghani, Ishwor Thapa, Deepak Adhikari

et al.

Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(1)

Published: Nov. 13, 2024

Language: Английский

Evaluation and analysis of liquefaction potential of gravelly soils using explainable probabilistic machine learning model DOI
Kaushik Jas, Sujith Mangalathu, G. R. Dodagoudar

et al.

Computers and Geotechnics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 167, P. 106051 - 106051

Published: Jan. 8, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

20

Interpretable predictive modelling of outlet temperatures in Central Alberta’s hydrothermal system using boosting-based ensemble learning incorporating Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach DOI
Ruyang Yu, Kai Zhang, Tao Li

et al.

Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 134738 - 134738

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Interpretable prediction of thermal sensation for elderly people based on data sampling, machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) DOI
Guozhong Zheng, Yuqin Zhang, Xuhui Yue

et al.

Building and Environment, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 242, P. 110602 - 110602

Published: July 8, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

28

Liquefaction Potential Assessment of Soils Using Machine Learning Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review from 1994–2021 DOI
Kaushik Jas, G. R. Dodagoudar

International Journal of Geomechanics, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 23(7)

Published: April 28, 2023

Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for prediction of systems behavior in many engineering disciplines. A few applications ML techniques are available geotechnical and other fields civil engineering. The existing review studies on the application conventional earthquake geotechnics broader areas but not specific to liquefaction phenomenon. Studies exist potential cohesionless soils using with varying degree success. More needed formalize use seismic assessment. In this review, an attempt is made critically literature applied analysis. published from 1994 2021 been collected, reviewed, presented systematically form easy understand tables figures. labeled based data requirement techniques, methods, in-situ tests. summary table highlights relative importance input variables dataset required Limitations methods models, large database, comparison four developed probabilistic analysis included. gap outlined followed by way forward future research. It concluded that there need update database modify algorithms so they become computationally efficient reliable

Language: Английский

Citations

26

A Scientometrics Review of Soil Properties Prediction Using Soft Computing Approaches DOI
Jitendra Khatti, Kamaldeep Singh Grover

Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 31(3), P. 1519 - 1553

Published: Nov. 24, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

23

State-of-the-art review on the use of AI-enhanced computational mechanics in geotechnical engineering DOI Creative Commons
Hongchen Liu, Huaizhi Su, Lizhi Sun

et al.

Artificial Intelligence Review, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 57(8)

Published: July 5, 2024

Abstract Significant uncertainties can be found in the modelling of geotechnical materials. This attributed to complex behaviour soils and rocks amidst construction processes. Over past decades, field has increasingly embraced application artificial intelligence methodologies, thus recognising their suitability forecasting non-linear relationships intrinsic review offers a critical evaluation AI methodologies incorporated computational mechanics for engineering. The analysis categorises four pivotal areas: physical properties, mechanical constitutive models, other characteristics relevant Among various analysed, ANNs stand out as most commonly used strategy, while methods such SVMs, LSTMs, CNNs also see significant level application. widely algorithms are Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), representing 35%, 19%, 17% respectively. extensive is domain accounting 59%, followed by applications at 16%. efficacy intrinsically linked type datasets employed, selected model input. study outlines future research directions emphasising need integrate physically guided adaptive learning mechanisms enhance reliability adaptability addressing multi-scale multi-physics coupled problems geotechnics.

Language: Английский

Citations

9

Explainable Sinkhole Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine-Learning-Based SHAP: Quantifying and Comparing the Effects of Contributing Factors in Konya, Türkiye DOI Creative Commons
Süleyman Sefa Bilgilioğlu, Cemil Gezgin, Muzaffer Can İban

et al.

Applied Sciences, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(6), P. 3139 - 3139

Published: March 13, 2025

Sinkholes, naturally occurring formations in karst regions, represent a significant environmental hazard, threatening infrastructure, agricultural lands, and human safety. In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have been extensively employed for sinkhole susceptibility mapping (SSM). However, the lack of explainability inherent these methods remains critical issue decision-makers. this study, Konya Closed Basin was mapped using an interpretable model based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Machine (LightGBM) algorithms were employed, interpretability results enhanced through SHAP analysis. Among compared models, RF demonstrated highest performance, achieving accuracy 95.5% AUC score 98.8%, consequently selected development final map. analyses revealed that factors such as proximity to fault lines, mean annual precipitation, bicarbonate concentration difference are most variables influencing formation. Additionally, specific threshold values quantified, effects contributing analyzed detail. This study underscores importance employing eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) natural hazard modeling, SSM example, thereby providing decision-makers with more reliable comparable risk assessment.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Comparison of diverse machine learning algorithms for forest fire susceptibility mapping in Antalya, Türkiye DOI
Hazan Alkan Akıncı, Halil Akıncı, Mustafa Zeybek

et al.

Advances in Space Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 74(2), P. 647 - 667

Published: April 16, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

8

Classification of geogrid reinforcement in aggregate using machine learning techniques DOI Creative Commons

Samuel Olamide Aregbesola,

Yong‐Hoon Byun

International Journal of Geo-Engineering, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: Feb. 12, 2024

Abstract The present study proposes a novel ML methodology for differentiating between unstabilized aggregate specimens and those stabilized with triangular rectangular aperture geogrids. This utilizes the compiled experimental results obtained from under repeated loading into balanced, moderate-sized database. efficacy of five models, including tree-ensemble single-learning algorithms, in accurately identifying each specimen class was explored. Shapley’s additive explanation used to understand intricacies models determine global feature importance ranking input variables. All could identify an accuracy at least 0.9. outperformed when all three classes (unstabilized by geogrids) were considered, light gradient boosting machine showing best performance—an 0.94 area curve score 0.98. According explanation, resilient modulus confining pressure identified as most important features across models. Therefore, proposed may be effectively type presence geogrid reinforcement aggregates, based on few material properties performance loading.

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Explainable machine learning-based prediction for aerodynamic interference of a low-rise building on a high-rise building DOI
Bowen Yan, Wenhao Ding,

Zhao Jin

et al.

Journal of Building Engineering, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 82, P. 108285 - 108285

Published: Dec. 14, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

16