
JAMA Network Open, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8(4), P. e254852 - e254852
Published: April 14, 2025
Importance Housing instability may worsen control of type 2 diabetes outcomes. Objective To estimate the association between stable vs unstable housing and Design, Setting, Participants This cohort study analyzed electronic health record data adults with from US community-based centers June 2016 to April 2023. Targeted minimum loss estimation was used examine having not subsequent outcomes, adjusting for age, date assessment, sex, race ethnicity (social constructs that indicate experience racism), language, comorbidities, insurance, income, census-tract level social vulnerability index. Analyses were conducted July 2023 September 2024. Exposure Report stability or instability. Main Outcomes Measures Mean hemoglobin A 1c (HbA ) primary outcome; secondary outcomes included systolic diastolic blood pressure (SBP DBP) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The time point 12 months after initial points at 6, 18, 24, 30, 36 months. Results total 90 233 individuals (mean [SD] 55.4 [13.7] years; 50 772 female [56.3%]; 25 602 Black [28.4%], 27 277 Hispanic [31.4%], 51 720 White [57.3%]); 28 784 (31.9%) had a language other than English, 15 713 (17.4%) reported Prior first mean (SD) HbA 7.64% (1.94%), SBP 130.0 (13.5) mm Hg, DBP 78.2 (7.8) LDL cholesterol 101.1 (35.2) mg/dL. We estimated all experienced housing, compared would have been 0.12% lower (95% CI, −0.16% −0.07%; P < .001), 0.77 Hg −1.14 −0.39 Hg; 0.27 −0.49 −0.06 = .01), but (estimated difference, −1.46 mg/dL, 95% −2.96 mg/dL 0.03 mg/dL; .05) months, numerically similar results points. Conclusions Relevance In this study, associated small differences in outcomes; combining interventions be needed improve more substantially.
Language: Английский