Psychological inoculation protects against the social media infodemic DOI Creative Commons
Robert McPhedran, Michael Ratajczak,

Max Mawby

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 13(1)

Published: April 8, 2023

Abstract Misinformation can have a profound detrimental impact on populations’ wellbeing. In this large UK-based online experiment (n = 2430), we assessed the performance of false tag and inoculation interventions in protecting against different forms misinformation (‘variants’). While previous experiments used perception- or intention-based outcome measures, presented participants with real-life posts social media platform simulation measured their engagement, more ecologically valid approach. Our pre-registered mixed-effects models indicated that both reduced engagement misinformation, but was most effective. However, random differences analysis revealed protection conferred by differed across posts. Moderation immunity provided is robust to variation individuals’ cognitive reflection. This study provides novel evidence general effectiveness over tags, platforms’ current Given inoculation’s effect heterogeneity, concert will likely be required for future safeguarding efforts.

Language: Английский

The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction DOI Open Access
Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook

et al.

Nature Reviews Psychology, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 1(1), P. 13 - 29

Published: Jan. 12, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

805

Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online DOI Open Access
Gordon Pennycook, Ziv Epstein, Mohsen Mosleh

et al.

Nature, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 592(7855), P. 590 - 595

Published: March 17, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

741

Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public DOI Open Access
Sander van der Linden

Nature Medicine, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 28(3), P. 460 - 467

Published: March 1, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

372

Signal propagation in complex networks DOI
Peng Ji, Jiachen Ye, Yu Mu

et al.

Physics Reports, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 1017, P. 1 - 96

Published: April 5, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

180

Sentiment Analysis for Fake News Detection DOI Open Access
Miguel Á. Alonso, David Vilares, Carlos Gómez‐Rodríguez

et al.

Electronics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 10(11), P. 1348 - 1348

Published: June 5, 2021

In recent years, we have witnessed a rise in fake news, i.e., provably false pieces of information created with the intention deception. The dissemination this type news poses serious threat to cohesion and social well-being, since it fosters political polarization distrust people respect their leaders. huge amount that is disseminated through media makes manual verification unfeasible, which has promoted design implementation automatic systems for detection. creators use various stylistic tricks promote success creations, one them being excite sentiments recipients. This led sentiment analysis, part text analytics charge determining polarity strength expressed text, be used detection approaches, either as basis system or complementary element. article, study different uses analysis discussion most relevant elements shortcomings, requirements should met near future, such multilingualism, explainability, mitigation biases, treatment multimedia elements.

Language: Английский

Citations

158

Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation DOI Creative Commons
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand

Nature Communications, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 13(1)

Published: April 28, 2022

Interventions that shift users attention toward the concept of accuracy represent a promising approach for reducing misinformation sharing online. We assess replicability and generalizability this prompt effect by meta-analyzing 20 experiments (with total N = 26,863) completed our group between 2017 2020. This internal meta-analysis includes all relevant studies regardless outcome uses identical analyses across studies. Overall, prompts increased quality news people share (sharing discernment) relative to control, primarily intentions false headlines 10% control in these The magnitude did not significantly differ content (politics compared with COVID-19 related news) decay over successive trials. was robustly moderated gender, race, political ideology, education, or value explicitly placed on accuracy, but larger older, more reflective, attentive participants. demonstrates discernment.

Language: Английский

Citations

155

Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds DOI Creative Commons
Matthew Groh, Ziv Epstein, Chaz Firestone

et al.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 119(1)

Published: Dec. 28, 2021

The recent emergence of machine-manipulated media raises an important societal question: How can we know whether a video that watch is real or fake? In two online studies with 15,016 participants, present authentic videos and deepfakes ask participants to identify which which. We compare the performance ordinary human observers leading computer vision deepfake detection model find them similarly accurate, while making different kinds mistakes. Together, access model's prediction are more accurate than either alone, but inaccurate predictions often decrease participants' accuracy. To probe relative strengths weaknesses humans machines as detectors deepfakes, examine machine across video-level features, evaluate impact preregistered randomized interventions on detection. manipulations designed disrupt visual processing faces hinder mostly not affecting performance, suggesting role for specialized cognitive capacities in explaining performance.

Language: Английский

Citations

148

Scaling up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds DOI Creative Commons
Jennifer Allen, Antonio A. Arechar, Gordon Pennycook

et al.

Science Advances, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 7(36)

Published: Sept. 3, 2021

Professional fact-checking, a prominent approach to combating misinformation, does not scale easily. Furthermore, some distrust fact-checkers because of alleged liberal bias. We explore solution these problems: using politically balanced groups laypeople identify misinformation at scale. Examining 207 news articles flagged for fact-checking by Facebook algorithms, we compare accuracy ratings three professional who researched each article those 1128 Americans from Amazon Mechanical Turk rated article’s headline and lede. The average small, crowds (i) correlate with the fact-checker as well fact-checkers’ other (ii) predict whether majority “true” high accuracy. cognitive reflection, political knowledge, Democratic Party preference are positively related agreement fact-checkers, identifying headline’s publisher leads small increase in fact-checkers.

Language: Английский

Citations

109

Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents DOI
Antonio A. Arechar, Jennifer Allen,

Adam J. Berinsky

et al.

Nature Human Behaviour, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 7(9), P. 1502 - 1513

Published: June 29, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

105

Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation DOI
Xiaoli Nan, Yuan Wang, Kathryn Thier

et al.

Social Science & Medicine, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 314, P. 115398 - 115398

Published: Oct. 21, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

101