Business Strategy and the Environment,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
33(7), P. 7077 - 7099
Published: June 30, 2024
Abstract
The
circular
economy
(CE)
has
emerged
as
a
focal
point
in
discussions
surrounding
sustainable
development,
industrial
production,
and
resource
efficiency.
While
it
garnered
attention
ground‐breaking
paradigm
with
the
potential
to
harmonize
economic,
societal,
environmental
dynamics,
divergent
perspectives
critical
inquiries
have
surfaced.
This
paper
delves
into
interdisciplinary
literature
on
CE,
exploring
interpretative
flexibility
inherent
its
conceptualization.
Acknowledging
diverse
range
of
strategies
associated
study
contends
risks
misappropriation,
emphasizing
importance
understanding
systemic
socio‐ecological
implications.
With
an
umbrella
review
approach,
rarely
applied
social
sciences,
navigates
through
167
articles,
unveiling
thematic
trends
identifying
gaps
within
existing
literature.
By
scrutinizing
techno‐managerial
dominance
CE
discussions,
calls
overshadowing
numerous
issues.
It
highlights
systematic
CE's
aspects,
essential
provide
insights
how
policies,
strategies,
actions
affect
society,
well
emerging
discussion
alternative
transformative
paradigm.
concludes
three‐stage
design:
meticulous
analysis
revealing
trends,
reflective
exploration
research
avenues.
serves
comprehensive
guide
for
scholars
practitioners
holistic
encouraging
contributions
address
identified
fostering
evolution
The Science of The Total Environment,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
784, P. 147058 - 147058
Published: April 16, 2021
Nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
for
hydro-meteorological
risks
(HMRs)
reduction
and
management
are
becoming
increasingly
popular,
but
challenges
such
as
the
lack
of
well-recognised
standard
methodologies
to
evaluate
their
performance
upscale
implementation
remain.
We
systematically
current
state-of-the
art
on
models
tools
that
utilised
optimum
allocation,
design
efficiency
evaluation
NBS
five
HMRs
(flooding,
droughts,
heatwaves,
landslides,
storm
surges
coastal
erosion).
found
methods
assess
complex
issue
cost-benefits
analysis
still
in
development
stage
they
have
only
been
implemented
through
developed
other
purposes
fluid
dynamics
micro
catchment
scale
contexts.
Of
reviewed
numerical
MIKE-SHE,
SWMM
(for
floods),
ParFlow-TREES,
ACRU,
SIMGRO
droughts),
WRF,
ENVI-met
heatwaves),
FUNWAVE-TVD,
BROOK90
landslides),
TELEMAC
ADCIRC
surges)
more
flexible
effectiveness
specific
wetlands,
ponds,
trees,
parks,
grass,
green
roof/walls,
tree
roots,
vegetations,
coral
reefs,
mangroves,
sea
grasses,
oyster
salt
marshes,
sandy
beaches
dunes.
conclude
capable
assessing
multiple
benefits,
particularly
cost-effectiveness
HMR
not
readily
available.
Thus,
our
synthesis
modelling
can
facilitate
selection
maximise
opportunities
refute
political
hesitation
deployment
compared
with
grey
also
provision
a
wide
range
social
economic
co-benefits.
However,
there
is
need
bespoke
holistically
various
components
from
an
perspective.
Such
impact
assessment
under
different
scenarios
build
solid
evidence
base
upscaling
replicating
NBS.
Earth-Science Reviews,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
217, P. 103603 - 103603
Published: March 17, 2021
To
bring
to
fruition
the
capability
of
nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
in
mitigating
hydro-meteorological
risks
(HMRs)
and
facilitate
their
widespread
uptake
require
a
consolidated
knowledge-base
related
monitoring
methods,
efficiency,
functioning
ecosystem
services
they
provide.
We
attempt
fill
this
knowledge
gap
by
reviewing
compiling
existing
scientific
literature
on
including
ground-based
measurements
(e.g.
gauging
stations,
wireless
sensor
network)
remote
sensing
observations
from
topographic
LiDAR,
multispectral
radar
sensors)
that
have
been
used
and/or
can
be
relevant
monitor
performance
NBS
against
five
HMRs:
floods,
droughts,
heatwaves,
landslides,
storm
surges
coastal
erosion.
These
allow
mapping
impacts
specific
events.
found
selection
application
methods
mostly
rely
particular
being
monitored,
resource
availability
time,
budget,
space)
type
HMRs.
No
standalone
method
currently
exists
its
broadest
view.
However,
equipments,
tools
technologies
developed
for
other
purposes,
such
as
atmospheric
observations,
applied
accurately
mitigate
also
focused
capabilities
passive
active
sensing,
pointing
out
associated
opportunities
difficulties
application.
conclude
advancement
airborne
satellite-based
technology
has
signified
leap
systematic
performance,
well
provided
robust
way
spatial
temporal
comparison
intervention
versus
absence.
This
improved
measurement
support
evaluation
uncertainty
scepticism
selecting
over
artificially
built
concrete
structures
or
grey
approaches
addressing
questions
precariousness.
Remote
technical
developments,
however,
take
time
shift
toward
state
operational
readiness
progress
place
green
growth
rate,
changes
effectiveness
through
time).
More
research
is
required
develop
holistic
approach,
which
could
routinely
continually
large
scale
intervention.
increase
ecological
socio-economic
benefits
NBS,
create
high
levels
acceptance
confidence
overcoming
potential
implementations.
Journal of Cleaner Production,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
338, P. 130652 - 130652
Published: Jan. 24, 2022
An
increasing
world
population
is
projected
to
increase
water,
energy
and
food
requirements,
three
vital
resources
for
humankind.
Projected
climate
change
impacts
will
aggravate
water
availability,
as
well
flood
risks,
especially
in
urban
areas.
Nature-based
solutions
(NBS)
have
been
identified
key
concepts
defuse
the
expected
tensions
within
Water-Energy-Food
(W-E-F)
nexus
due
their
multiple
benefits.
In
this
paper,
authors
outlined
theories
concepts,
analyzed
real-life
case
studies,
discussed
potential
of
NBS
address
future
W-E-F
nexus.
For
purpose,
we
performed
a
systematic
literature
review
on
that
nexus,
summarized
19
representative
studies
identify
current
knowledge
gaps
challenges.
The
quantitative
qualitative
data
was
used
differentiate
discuss
direct
indirect
benefits
study
further
expanded
challenges
implementation
highlighted
growing
possibilities
context
circularity
planning.
It
concluded
identified,
but
effects
not
in-depth.
Moreover,
indicators
are
mostly
single-purpose
multipurpose,
required
fully
characterize
holistically.
Overall,
there
need
adopt
systemic
thinking
promote
multipurpose
design
NBS.
Circular Economy and Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
1(1), P. 319 - 332
Published: March 17, 2021
Abstract
Cities
worldwide
are
facing
a
number
of
serious
challenges
including
population
growth,
resource
depletion,
climate
change,
and
degradation
ecosystems.
To
cope
with
these
challenges,
the
transformation
our
cities
into
sustainable
systems
using
holistic
approach
is
required.
The
pathway
to
this
urban
transition
adopting
concept
circular
economy
for
management.
In
way,
resources
kept
reused
within
city.
Nature-based
solutions
can
be
implemented
tasks,
besides
circularity,
they
provide
additional
benefits
urbanites
environment
in
general.
This
paper
describes
which
related
circularity
addressed
through
nature-based
solutions.
systematic
review
was
developed
COST
Action
CA17133
Circular
City
that
investigates
how
used
progress
built
environment.
The Science of The Total Environment,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
787, P. 147615 - 147615
Published: May 7, 2021
One
of
the
key
features
nature-based
solutions
(NBSs)
is
their
high
effectiveness
and
economic
resource
efficiency
in
solving
problems
compared
to
traditional
grey
interventions.
These
aspects,
however,
have
so
far
attracted
little
attention
literature
but
should
be
considered,
as
evaluation
NBS
projects
before
implementation
provides
an
opportunity
use
them
practical
tools.
This
paper
aims
present
a
new
framework
(at
stage
solution
selection)
based
on
application
performance
questions
indicators
approach.
The
consists
three
main
stages:
(1)
formulation
project
aim(s),
including
problem(s)
solved,
scales
expected
effects
thresholds
achieved;
(2)
elimination
that
do
not
fit
local
conditions
setting
requirements;
(3)
examination
questions.
To
consider
whole
spectrum
influencing
factors,
systematic
review
was
performed
indicate
concepts
related
issue
effectiveness,
stakeholders'
participation,
policy
management
capability,
efficiency,
(4)
analysis
synergies
trade-offs,
(5)
adaptation
conditions,
(6)
adequate
spatial
scale
(7)
long
term.
In
current
study
around
130
were
identified
for
projects.
Regarding
impact
state
knowledge,
work
contributes
discussion
conceptual
sphere
its
by
introducing
multi-perspective
standards
guidelines
selection
possible
projects,
it
deals
with
complexity
trade-offs
between
benefits.
Water Research,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
187, P. 116423 - 116423
Published: Sept. 19, 2020
Water
–
the
most
vital
resource,
negatively
affected
by
linear
pattern
of
growth
still
tries
to
find
its
positioning
within
emerging
concept
circular
economy.
Fragmented,
sectorial
circularity
approaches
hide
risk
underestimating
both
preservation
and
impacts
water
resources
natural
capital.
In
this
study,
a
game
changing
assessment
framework
is
developed
(i.e.
MSWCA).
The
MSWCA
follows
multi-sectoral
systems
approach,
symbiotically
managing
key
water-related
socio-economic
urban
water,
agro-food,
energy,
industry
waste
handling)
non-economic
environment)
sectors.
modelling
enables
investigation
feedback
loops
between
nature-managed
human-managed
assess
circularity.
three
CE
principles
lie
at
core
framework,
enabling
consideration
physical,
technical,
environmental
economic
aspects.
An
indicators
database
further
developed,
including
all
relevant
data
requirements,
as
well
existing
newly
assessing
systems'
conceptually
applied
fictional
city,
facilitating
understanding
practical
use.
Water,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
13(23), P. 3334 - 3334
Published: Nov. 24, 2021
Nature-Based
Solutions
(NBS)
have
been
proven
to
effectively
mitigate
and
solve
resource
depletion
climate-related
challenges
in
urban
areas.
The
COST
(Cooperation
Science
Technology)
Action
CA17133
entitled
“Implementing
nature-based
solutions
for
building
a
resourceful
circular
city”
has
established
seven
circularity
(UCC)
that
can
be
addressed
with
NBS.
This
paper
presents
the
outcomes
of
five
elucidation
workshops
more
than
20
European
experts
from
different
backgrounds.
These
international
were
used
examine
effectiveness
NBS
address
UCC
foster
implementation
towards
water
management.
A
major
outcome
was
identification
two
most
relevant
resources
areas:
‘Restoring
maintaining
cycle’
(UCC1)
‘Water
waste
treatment,
recovery,
reuse’
(UCC2).
s
Moreover,
significant
synergies
‘Nutrient
recovery
reuse’,
‘Material
‘Food
biomass
production’,
‘Energy
efficiency
recovery’,
‘Building
system
recovery’
identified.
Additionally,
real-life
case
studies
demonstrate
how
supporting
units
contribute
UCC.
Finally,
case-based
semi-quantitative
assessment
presented
performed.
Most
notably,
this
identifies
typically
employed
enable
processes
UCC1
UCC2.
While
current
consensus
is
well
by
individual
NBS,
we
presently
highlight
potential
combining
synergize
enabling
processes.
study
new
paradigm
aims
enhance
awareness
on
ability
multiple
issues.