Unequal Recovery in Colorectal Cancer Screening Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Microsimulation Analysis DOI Creative Commons
Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Rosita van den Puttelaar, Anne I. Hahn

et al.

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 26, 2022

Abstract The aftermath of the initial phase COVID-19 pandemic may contribute to widening disparities in access colorectal cancer (CRC) screening due differential disruptions CRC screening. This comparative microsimulation analysis uses two CISNET models simulate impact ongoing induced by on long-term outcomes. We evaluate three channels through which was disrupted: delays screening, regimen switching, and discontinuation. these outcomes measured number Life-years lost compared a scenario without any disruptions. While short-term 3-18 months are predicted result minor life-years loss, discontinuing could much more significant reductions expected benefits These results demonstrate that unequal recovery following can widen emphasize importance ensuring equitable pandemic.

Language: Английский

COVID-19 and the disruption of cancer screening programs: Key lessons for the recovery DOI Open Access
Linda Rabeneck, Mona Saraiya

Preventive Medicine, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 151, P. 106687 - 106687

Published: June 30, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Nimble Approach: fast, adapting, calculating and ethically mindful approach to managing colorectal cancer screening programmes during a pandemic DOI Creative Commons
Nancy N. Baxter,

Marcia Facey,

Arlinda Ruco

et al.

BMJ Open Gastroenterology, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 9(1), P. e000826 - e000826

Published: Jan. 1, 2022

Objective To describe a conceptual framework that provides understanding of the challenges encountered and adaptive approaches taken by organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes during initial phase COVID-19 pandemic. Design This was qualitative case study international CRC programmes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with programme managers/leaders experts, researchers clinical leaders large, population-based Data analysis, using elements grounded theory, as well cross-cases analysis two experienced researchers. Results 19 participants interviewed from seven in North America, Europe Australasia. A (‘Nimble Approach’) key outcome analysis. Four concepts constitute this approach to managing COVID-19: Fast (meeting need make decisions communicate quickly), Adapting (flexibly creatively testing/colonoscopy capacity, access backlogs), Calculating (modelling actively monitoring inform decision-making support quality) Ethically Mindful (considering ethical conundrums emerging responses). Highly integrated programmes, those highly communication networks, managed greater portions process seemed best positioned respond crisis. Conclusions The Nimble Approach has potentially broad applications; it can be deployed effectively programme-specific or manage future pandemics, other health crises emergencies.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Effectiveness of Telehealth for Women’s Preventive Services DOI Open Access
Amy Cantor, Heidi D Nelson,

Miranda Pappas

et al.

Published: June 16, 2022

Objectives. To evaluate the effectiveness, use, and implementation of telehealth for women’s preventive services reproductive healthcare interpersonal violence (IPV), to patient preferences engagement telehealth, particularly in context coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Data sources. Ovid MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, Embase®, Cochrane CENTRAL databases (July 1, 2016, March 4, 2022); manual review reference lists; suggestions from stakeholders; responses a Federal Register Notice. Review methods. Eligible abstracts full-text articles interventions were independently dual reviewed inclusion using predefined criteria. Dual was used data abstraction, study-level risk bias assessment, strength evidence (SOE) rating established Meta-analysis not conducted due heterogeneity studies limited available data. Results. Searches identified 5,704 unique records. Eight randomized controlled trials, one nonrandomized trial, seven observational studies, involving 10,731 participants, met Of these, nine evaluated IPV contraceptive care, only health service studied. Risk low study, moderate trials five high study. Telehealth intended replace usual care 14 supplement 2 studies. Delivery modes included telephone (5 studies), online modules mobile applications (1 study), unclear or undefined There no differences between comparators rates sexually transmitted infection, pregnancy (low SOE); insufficient abortion rates. versus outcomes measuring repeat IPV, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, fear partner, coercive control, self-efficacy, safety behaviors SOE). The COVID-19 pandemic increased utilization. Barriers internet access digital literacy among English-speaking survivors, technical challenges confidentiality concerns care. use facilitated by strategies ensure individuals who receive services. Evidence access, equity, harms outcomes. Conclusions. Limited suggests that result equivalent clinical patient-reported as in-person Uncertainty remains regarding most effective approaches delivering these services, how best mobilize women facing barriers healthcare.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Statewide Examination of Access to Cancer Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic DOI Open Access
Elizabeth J. Adams, Joe Feinglass, Rachel Hae‐Soo Joung

et al.

Journal of Surgical Research, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 286, P. 8 - 15

Published: Oct. 24, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Unequal Recovery in Colorectal Cancer Screening Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Microsimulation Analysis DOI Creative Commons
Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Rosita van den Puttelaar, Anne I. Hahn

et al.

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 26, 2022

Abstract The aftermath of the initial phase COVID-19 pandemic may contribute to widening disparities in access colorectal cancer (CRC) screening due differential disruptions CRC screening. This comparative microsimulation analysis uses two CISNET models simulate impact ongoing induced by on long-term outcomes. We evaluate three channels through which was disrupted: delays screening, regimen switching, and discontinuation. these outcomes measured number Life-years lost compared a scenario without any disruptions. While short-term 3-18 months are predicted result minor life-years loss, discontinuing could much more significant reductions expected benefits These results demonstrate that unequal recovery following can widen emphasize importance ensuring equitable pandemic.

Language: Английский

Citations

4