Review: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R0/PR2 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke‐Sumner

Published: Sept. 4, 2022

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Understanding the mix of services for mental health care in urban DR Congo: a qualitative descriptive study DOI Creative Commons
Erick Mukala Mayoyo, Bart Criel,

Abdoulaye Sow

et al.

BMC Health Services Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 23(1)

Published: Nov. 4, 2023

Mental health workers (MHWs) are exposed to conflicts of competence daily when performing tasks related the provision mental services. This may be linked a lack understanding their as caregivers and providers. Furthermore, in most low-income settings, it is unclear how available services organized coordinated provide care. To understand above, this study aimed identify current mix for care urban Democratic Republic Congo (DRC).A qualitative descriptive was carried out Lubumbashi from February April 2021. We conducted 7 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 74 key informants (family members, primary physicians, etc.) 13 in-depth interviews (IDIs) (traditional healers, psychiatrists, etc.). performed content analysis, guided by an analytical framework, that led development comprehensive inventory MHWs household level specialized facilities, exploring delivery, identifying existing services, defining organization.Analysis transcripts FGDs IDIs showed traditional healers family leading providers Lubumbashi. The exploration revealed lifestyle, therapies, psychotherapy, medication main types offered/advised patients. Active informal do not currently corresponding competencies. rare specialists presently recognize contribution considered marginal. identified five services: therapy social psychiatric Analyses pointed inversion ideal these services.Our findings show suboptimal point clear collaboration between MHWs. There urgent need clearly define MHWs, build capacity nonspecialists, shift health-related them, raise awareness about collaborative approaches.

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Recommendation: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R2/PR13 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke‐Sumner

Published: Feb. 22, 2023

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Decision: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R2/PR14 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke‐Sumner

Published: March 9, 2023

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Recommendation: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R1/PR10 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke‐Sumner

Published: Jan. 17, 2023

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Author comment: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R2/PR12 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg

Published: Feb. 20, 2023

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Decision: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R1/PR11 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke‐Sumner

Published: Feb. 2, 2023

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Review: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R1/PR9 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke‐Sumner

Published: Jan. 16, 2023

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Understanding the mix of services for mental health care in urban DR Congo: A qualitative descriptive study DOI Creative Commons
Erick Mukala Mayoyo, Bart Criel,

Abdoulaye Sow

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: June 16, 2023

Abstract Background: Mental health workers (MHWs) may be exposed to conflicts of competencies in performing tasks related mental care provision. This linked a lack understanding their as caregivers and providers. Furthermore, most low-income settings, it is unclear how the available services are organized coordinated provide care. To understand above, this study aimed identify current mix for urban Democratic Republic Congo (DRC). Methods: A qualitative descriptive was carried out city Lubumbashi from February April 2021. We conducted 7 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 74 key informants (family members, primary physicians, etc.) 13 in-depth interviews (IDIs) (traditional healers, psychiatrists, etc.). performed content analysis, guided by an analytical framework, that led development comprehensive inventory MHWs household level specialized facilities, exploring delivery, identifying existing services, defining organization. Results: Analysis transcripts FGDs IDIs showed traditional healers family main providers Lubumbashi. The exploration revealed lifestyle, therapies, psychotherapy medication types offered/advised patients. Active informal do not currently corresponding competencies. rare specialists presently recognize contribution considered marginal. identified five services: therapy social psychiatric facilities. Analyses pointed inversion ideal these services. Conclusions: Our findings show suboptimal point clear collaboration between MHWs. There urgent need clearly define MHWs, build capacity nonspecialists, shift health-related them raise awareness about collaborative approaches.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Author comment: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R1/PR7 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg

Published: Dec. 7, 2022

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Recommendation: Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review — R0/PR4 DOI Creative Commons
André Janse van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke‐Sumner

Published: Sept. 26, 2022

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range services embedded in well-coordinated systems care to enable recovery, promote well-being optimise social integration. concept recovery is strongly rooted the centrality multi intersectoral care, and, while -intersectoral dimensions health have been highlighted analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has elaborated terms these approaches (SMI) low- middle-income countries (LMICs). aim this review was identify describe underpinning community-based SMI interventions LMICs. A scoping carried out following steps: (1) Objectives for were developed refined; (2) systematic search databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) previous reviews undertaken from 2012 2022, where relevant papers identified; (3) Papers focus specific description an intervention, located LMICs, explicit linkages between sectors, published English, selected inclusion; (4) Data extracted charted (5) Findings analysed reported thematically. Thirty-six included analysis, 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop secondary data case studies. Examples multi- action collaboration healthcare community support systems, providing supported housing supportive spaces biomedical spheres care. Barriers dominance professions delivering stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- requires investments financing, education coordination by governing body.

Language: Английский

Citations

0