Effectiveness of training actions aimed at improving critical thinking in the face of disinformation: A systematic review protocol DOI
José-Manuel Marcos-Vílchez, Milagrosa Sánchez-Martín, José Antonio Muñiz Velázquez

et al.

Thinking Skills and Creativity, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 51, P. 101474 - 101474

Published: Feb. 6, 2024

Language: Английский

Ethical Considerations in Infodemic Management: Systematic Scoping Review DOI Creative Commons
Federico Germani, Giovanni Spitale, Sandra Varaidzo Machiri

et al.

JMIR Infodemiology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 4, P. e56307 - e56307

Published: Aug. 29, 2024

Background During health emergencies, effective infodemic management has become a paramount challenge. A new era marked by rapidly changing information ecosystem, combined with the widespread dissemination of misinformation and disinformation, magnified complexity issue. For measures to be effective, acceptable, trustworthy, robust framework ethical considerations is needed. Objective This systematic scoping review aims identify analyze procedural principles relevant management, ultimately enhancing effectiveness these practices increasing trust in stakeholders performing goal safeguarding public health. Methods The involved comprehensive examination literature related from 2002 2022, drawing publications PubMed, Scopus, Web Science. Policy documents material were included search strategy. Papers screened against inclusion exclusion criteria, core thematic areas systematically identified categorized following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We analyzed substantive that crucial guiding actions realms social listening, as well principles. In this review, we consider are extensively deliberated upon literature, such equity, justice, or respect autonomy. However, acknowledge existence relevance practices, which also that, when implemented, enhance efficacy while ensuring Results Drawing 103 publications, yielded several key findings principles, approaches, guidelines practice context management. Community engagement, empowerment through education, inclusivity emerged quality communication listening efforts, fostering trust, emerging theme principle. emphasized significance transparency, privacy, cybersecurity data collection. Conclusions underscores pivotal role ethics bolstering From body it becomes evident serve essential instruments cultivating credibility facilitating medium-term long-term viability approaches.

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Incorporating Psychological Science Into Policy Making DOI Creative Commons
Anastasia Kozyreva,

Laura Smillie,

Stephan Lewandowsky

et al.

European Psychologist, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 28(3), P. 206 - 224

Published: July 1, 2023

The spread of false and misleading information in online social networks is a global problem need urgent solutions. It also policy because misinformation can harm both the public democracies. To address misinformation, policymakers require successful interface between science policy, as well range evidence-based solutions that respect fundamental rights while efficiently mitigating harms online. In this article, we discuss how regulatory nonregulatory instruments be informed by scientific research used to reach EU objectives. First, consider what it means approach problem. We then outline four building blocks for cooperation scientists who wish misinformation: understanding problem, psychological drivers perceptions finding solutions, co-developing appropriate measures. Finally, through lens science, examine have been proposed EU, focusing on strengthened Code Practice Disinformation 2022.

Language: Английский

Citations

13

The Misinformation Receptivity Framework DOI
Leor Zmigrod, Ryan Burnell, Michael Hameleers

et al.

European Psychologist, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 28(3), P. 173 - 188

Published: July 1, 2023

Abstract: Evaluating the truthfulness of new information is a difficult and complex task. Notably, there currently no unified theoretical framework that addresses questions (1) how individuals discern whether political true or (deliberately) false, (2) under what conditions are most susceptible to believing misinformation, (3) structure communicative environments skews cognitive processes truth, discernment, interpretation generation. To move forward, we propose Misinformation Receptivity Framework (MRF). Building on Bayesian probabilistic models cognition, MRF suggests can conceptualize misinformation receptivity as inference problem in which reliability incoming weighed against prior beliefs. This “reliability-weighting” process model when adopt reject well ways they creatively generate interpretations rather than passively truth versus falsehood. Moreover, certain communication contexts lead people rely excessively (mis)information conversely The postulates such environmental properties heighten persuasiveness different kinds misinformation. For instance, predicts noisy contexts, inputs ambiguous, make highly partisan ideological disinformation amplifies their existing belief systems. By contrast, contextual instability renders would be considered extreme worldview-incongruent stability. formally delineates interactions between mechanisms, offering insights testable hypotheses when, how, why proliferate.

Language: Английский

Citations

13

Countering misinformation through psychological inoculation DOI
Sander van der Linden

Advances in experimental social psychology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 58

Published: Dec. 19, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

12

Stakeholder perceptions of regulatory responses to misinformation in Kenya and Senegal DOI Creative Commons
Kevin C. Mudavadi, Frankline Matanji, Layire Diop

et al.

Journalism, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: May 23, 2024

While misinformation is very prevalent in Africa, we have a limited understanding of how key stakeholders, such as journalists, fact-checkers, policy experts, and educators, perceive responses to address its spread. Based on an analysis 46 interviews with media professionals other stakeholders from Kenya Senegal, find divergent perceptions what regulatory interventions are needed slow the spread two countries. In Kenya, advocated for self-regulation rather than government intervention curb misinformation, while they called more regulations Additionally, interviewees perceived approaches, proposed laws reactive solutions, often resulting specific incident country, educational requiring literacy education schools, sustainable solutions potentially longer-term outcomes.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Fighting the infodemic: the 4 i Framework for Advancing Communication and Trust DOI Creative Commons
Anne E. Sundelson, Amelia Jamison,

Noelle Huhn

et al.

BMC Public Health, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 23(1)

Published: Aug. 30, 2023

The proliferation of false and misleading health claims poses a major threat to public health. This ongoing "infodemic" has prompted numerous organizations develop tools approaches manage the spread falsehoods communicate more effectively in an environment mistrust information. However, these have not been systematically characterized, limiting their utility. analysis provides characterization current ecosystem infodemic management strategies, allowing practitioners, communicators, researchers, policy makers gain understanding at disposal.A multi-pronged search strategy was used identify for combatting health-related misinformation disinformation. included scoping review academic literature; gray literature from involved communications misinformation/disinformation management; policies all U.S. state departments select local departments. A team annotators labelled main feature(s) each tool or approach using iteratively developed list tags.We identified over 350 approaches. We introduce 4 i Framework Advancing Communication Trust (4 FACT), modified social-ecological model, characterize different levels intervention: informational, individual, interpersonal, institutional. Information-level strategies those designed amplify factual information, fill information voids, debunk track circulating verify, detect, rate credibility Individual-level enhance literacy prebunking/inoculation tools. Strategies interpersonal/community level resources communicators community engagement Institutional structural journalists fact checkers, managing academic/scientific literature, researchers/research, managers, social media regulation, policy/legislation.The FACT useful way strategies. Recognizing complex multifaceted nature infodemic, efforts should be taken utilize integrate across four model.

Language: Английский

Citations

11

News Literacy and Public Service News Broadcasting: Is There a Connection? Evaluating News Literacy Among Viewers and Non-Viewers of PSB News Programming in Austria DOI Creative Commons
Kimberly Callecod-Weinrich, Janez Krek

SAGE Open, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

News literate individuals have the requisite knowledge, skills, and motivation to navigate today’s complex news ecosystems participate in civic life. This study’s objective was use survey research evaluate literacy its attitudinal dimensions among viewers non-viewers of television programming on public service broadcasters (PSBs), drawing an existing measurement model developed by Maksl, Ashley, Craft. Results obtained from a representative sample adult consumers Austria ( n = 492) suggest that regular PSB are significantly more likely exhibit characteristics highly individuals, even when controlling for age educational level. Establishing baseline this cohort midst transforming media landscape fills gap nascent discipline provides useful point reference future scholarship.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

How effective are fact-checks in Pakistan and who engages with them? DOI Creative Commons
Waqas Ejaz, Sacha Altay, Muhammad Ittefaq

et al.

Information Communication & Society, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 23

Published: Feb. 19, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

People at-risk of an Eating Disorder are more likely to endorse dietary misinformation claims and hold rigid beliefs DOI Creative Commons
Neophytos Georgiou,

Matt Thompson,

Victoria M. E. Bridgland

et al.

Journal of Health Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 17, 2025

People are exposed to misinformation about dieting practices every day on social media which can influence their health and wellbeing. While research has largely focused general vulnerabilities strategies counteract its spread, limited work examined how specific harmful content, such as dietary misinformation, influences vulnerable groups, particularly those at risk of eating disorders (EDs). This study investigated whether individuals an ED were more likely endorse Dietary Misinformation. After completing measures intentions, conscientiousness weight concern, 215 participants completed a behavioural measure belief rigidity (i.e. Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence; BADE), diet-specific susceptibility. The findings suggest that who score highly concern (ie, potentially for ED), less show flexibility integrate new evidence inclined misinformation. highlights the broader importance drawing attention particular online affect wellbeing in this case risk.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Countermeasures against fake news: a Delphi study DOI
João Varela da Costa, Miguel Mira da Silva

Transforming Government People Process and Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 18, 2025

Purpose This study aims to address the growing challenge of fake news in undermining democratic governance. It develop effective strategies combat news-related crimes, which digital technology advancements and proliferation social media have exacerbated. Design/methodology/approach The research uses a Delphi methodology, gathering insights from law enforcement agencies, policymakers socio-technological experts. Through three rounds data collection analysis, this builds consensus on critical interventions for mitigating risks crimes. Findings identifies such as disinformation account monitoring, legislative reforms, public awareness initiatives educational programmes enhance literacy. These contribute comprehensive approach countering impacts news. Practical implications provides actionable recommendations institutions strengthen resilience against disinformation. emphasises importance legislative, technological measures safeguard processes rebuild trust. Originality/value contributes literature mitigation by offering structured, expert-driven developing countermeasures. Its focus consensus-building through offers novel enhancing institutional defences era.

Language: Английский

Citations

0