Not taking “no” for an answer: the interactional organization of accepting and refusing childhood vaccination in the Netherlands DOI Creative Commons
Robert Prettner, Hedwig te Molder, Jeffrey D. Robinson

et al.

Discourse Processes, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 27

Published: Nov. 28, 2024

Communication-intervention strategies for reducing vaccine hesitancy have been primarily based on survey and interview data. Virtually absent is an understanding of how organized interactionally in its primary, natural environment medical consultations between parents healthcare providers. This article uses conversation analysis to describe the sequence organization action providers soliciting parents' vaccination intent. We demonstrate that acceptance "preferred" sequence-closure relevant refusal "dispreferred" sequence-expansion relevant. Regarding refusal, we three different sequence-expansive actions, including account, cautioning about consequences "keeping door open" future vaccination. Data are 62 videotaped interactions newborns Netherlands. Findings implications design communication-intervention involving perspectives providing them with information toward goal their hesitancy.

Language: Английский

Identifying the underlying psychological constructs from self-expressed anti-vaccination argumentation DOI Open Access
Dawn Liu Holford, Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez, Angelo Fasce

et al.

Published: March 19, 2024

People’s negative attitudes to vaccines can be motivated by psychological factors—such as fears, ideological beliefs, and cognitive patterns—known “attitude roots”. This study had two primary objectives: (1) identify which of 11 known attitude roots are featured in individuals’ self-expressed reasons for vaccine (i.e., a linguistic analysis); (2) explore how present texts linked specific measures. To achieve Objective 1, our collected data December 2022-January 2023 from 556 participants the US, who wrote explain their attitudes. The encompassed 2,327 conceptually independent units anti-vaccination argumentation, that were each coded its root(s) at least experts. By allowing spontaneously express own words, we able observe this differed what reported endorse when presented with list arguments. We found there four groups based on similarity self-expression. In addition, latent class analysis participants’ identified three distinct characterised tendency combinations arguments related anti-scientific conceptions, (3) politicised perspectives. 2, responses validated measures constructs expected underlie respective roots, used correlational design investigate these Logistic regressions showed an construct was strongest, significant, predictor expression out root groups. discuss implications findings health communicators practitioners.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of challenges in vaccine communication and training needs: A qualitative study DOI Creative Commons
Dawn Liu Holford, Emma Anderson,

Aishmita Biswas

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 26, 2024

Abstract Background: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) can play an important role in encouraging patients and their caregivers to be vaccinated. The objective of this qualitative study was investigate HCPs’ perspectives on challenges vaccine communication unmet training needs domain. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 41 HCPs (mainly nurses physicians) vaccination roles (23 England; 18 France), gathering information on: (1) approach conversations patients; (2) Challenges communicating about vaccines; (3) Vaccine-related learning resources available HCPs, ; (4) around communication. Results: HCPs described a range experiences that indicated insufficient time, information, skills confidently navigate difficult vaccine-hesitant patients. Communication especially avoid conflict could potentially damage the patient-provider relationship. Some interviewed had received training, but for most, not specific vaccination. Although general transferable conversations, most welcomed informational support countering patients’ misconceptions or misinformation vaccines. Conclusions: would benefit from tailored address patients, should part systemic also provides time space have effective conversations.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
A–Z of prescribing for children DOI
Kate Davies

Journal of Prescribing Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6(6), P. 242 - 243

Published: June 2, 2024

This series focuses on aspects of prescribing for neonates, children and young people, from A–Z. Aspects pharmacokinetics will be considered, alongside legal considerations, consent medications in schools

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Not taking “no” for an answer: the interactional organization of accepting and refusing childhood vaccination in the Netherlands DOI Creative Commons
Robert Prettner, Hedwig te Molder, Jeffrey D. Robinson

et al.

Discourse Processes, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 27

Published: Nov. 28, 2024

Communication-intervention strategies for reducing vaccine hesitancy have been primarily based on survey and interview data. Virtually absent is an understanding of how organized interactionally in its primary, natural environment medical consultations between parents healthcare providers. This article uses conversation analysis to describe the sequence organization action providers soliciting parents' vaccination intent. We demonstrate that acceptance "preferred" sequence-closure relevant refusal "dispreferred" sequence-expansion relevant. Regarding refusal, we three different sequence-expansive actions, including account, cautioning about consequences "keeping door open" future vaccination. Data are 62 videotaped interactions newborns Netherlands. Findings implications design communication-intervention involving perspectives providing them with information toward goal their hesitancy.

Language: Английский

Citations

0