Open Book Publishers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 17 - 28
Published: July 30, 2024
Researches
into
the
Physical
History
of
Man
(1813)
‘the
founder
modern
anthropology’,
James
Cowles
Prichard,
codified
comparative-historical
approach
that
was
based
on
study
languages
and
other
aspects
culture.
However,
it
also
already
responded
to
fledgling
physical
anthropology,
or
craniology,
as
practiced
by
such
figures
Petrus
Camper
Johann
Friedrich
Blumenbach.
Blumenbach
among
things
explored
diagrams
for
their
possibilities
experimentation.
Both
men
used
suggest
feasibility
morphing
human
varieties
each
other.
Like
Prichard’s
ethnography,
Camper’s
Blumenbach’s
diagrammatics
aimed
demonstrate
single
origin
unity
humankind.
Open Book Publishers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 261 - 272
Published: July 30, 2024
Chapter
19
looks
at
the
ways
in
which
practitioners
themselves
conceive
of
history
their
field.
The
second
revolution
ancient
DNA
research
is
said
to
have
revealed
that
present-day
genetic
samples
did
not
allow
for
reconstruction
events
because,
contrary
Luigi
Luca
Cavalli-Sforza’s
and
other
pioneers’
expectations,
people
had
migrated
mixed,
thus
blurring
patterns
past.
Although
such
a
view
seems
deconstruct
tree
diagram
associated
notion
living
humans
can
be
biologically
grouped
into
primeval
‘races’
once
all,
some
population
geneticists
public
figures
maintain
meaningful
average
differences
between
populations
exist.
Open Book Publishers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 45 - 52
Published: July 30, 2024
While
there
was
a
way
of
using
diagrams
to
evidence
close
human
kinship,
were
thus
also
used
deny
genealogical
relatedness,
create
differences
within
humankind
that
amounted
the
status
unrelated
species.
Samuel
George
Morton
drew
especially
on
French
polygenist
writings,
in
which
rather
elaborate
system
measurements
already
place.
This
diagrammatics
‘race’
enmeshed
matters
‘racial’
politics.
At
same
time,
referred
works
monogenists,
and
members
both
camps
could
stand
for
complex
contradicting
politics
knowledge.
Open Book Publishers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 145 - 150
Published: July 30, 2024
As
shown
in
Part
II,
there
fact
existed
theories
of
human
classification
and
evolution
the
history
anthropology
that
corresponded
to
notions
transported
by
family
tree,
such
as
independent
populations.
Sometimes
explicitly
drawing
on
Ernst
Haeckel’s
phylogenies,
some
anthropologists
published
polygenist
diagrams
convey
their
understanding
intra-human
specific
or
even
generic
differences
well
into
twentieth
century.
In
these
visualization
practices,
tree
shape
was
increasingly
radicalized
through
prolongation
lines
leading
modern
groups
were
thereby
constructed
hierarchical
order.
At
same
time,
while
have
been
critical
voices
opposed
this
kind
thinking
with
at
least
since
Charles
Darwin,
it
is
especially
from
interwar
period
‘racial
trees’
came
under
critique
relying
a
faulty
genetics
evolution,
racist
–
became
louder
aftermath
World
War
II.
The
debates
once
again
related
larger
politics,
also
up
until
anthropological
can
be
connected
pedigrees
developed
used
eugenics
research,
most
all
studies
mixing’.
Open Book Publishers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 123 - 140
Published: July 30, 2024
That
Charles
Darwin
partook
in
conceptualizing
general
human
advancement
terms
of
a
series
sequential
steps
is
evident
Descent.
But
there
were
also
other,
tree-like,
diagrammatic
metaphors
and
images
use
by
naturalists,
linguists,
embryologists,
anthropologists.
Chapter
9
therefore
explores
why
never
even
experimented
on
drawing
phylogenetic
tree
that
included
intra-human
differentiation.
It
seems
the
time
Descent
appeared,
predominantly
monogenist
diagram
had
already
been
driven
beyond
its
initial
purpose.
In
particular
Ernst
Haeckel’s
phylogenies
showed
‘the
family
tree’
could
support
racism
polygenism.
Open Book Publishers,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 17 - 28
Published: July 30, 2024
Researches
into
the
Physical
History
of
Man
(1813)
‘the
founder
modern
anthropology’,
James
Cowles
Prichard,
codified
comparative-historical
approach
that
was
based
on
study
languages
and
other
aspects
culture.
However,
it
also
already
responded
to
fledgling
physical
anthropology,
or
craniology,
as
practiced
by
such
figures
Petrus
Camper
Johann
Friedrich
Blumenbach.
Blumenbach
among
things
explored
diagrams
for
their
possibilities
experimentation.
Both
men
used
suggest
feasibility
morphing
human
varieties
each
other.
Like
Prichard’s
ethnography,
Camper’s
Blumenbach’s
diagrammatics
aimed
demonstrate
single
origin
unity
humankind.