Advances of epigenetic editing DOI Creative Commons
Rutger A. F. Gjaltema, Marianne G. Rots

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 57, P. 75 - 81

Published: June 29, 2020

Epigenetic editing refers to the locus-specific targeting of epigenetic enzymes rewrite local landscape an endogenous genomic site, often with aim transcriptional reprogramming. Implementing clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat–dCas9 greatly accelerated advancement editing, yielding preclinical therapeutic successes using a variety enzymes. Here, we review current applications these tools in mammals and shed light on biochemical improvements that facilitate versatile applications.

Language: Английский

The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease DOI
Max Greenberg, Déborah Bourc’his

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 20(10), P. 590 - 607

Published: Aug. 9, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

1692

The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond DOI Creative Commons
Mazhar Adli

Nature Communications, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 9(1)

Published: May 9, 2018

CRISPR is becoming an indispensable tool in biological research. Once known as the bacterial immune system against invading viruses, programmable capacity of Cas9 enzyme now revolutionizing diverse fields medical research, biotechnology, and agriculture. CRISPR-Cas9 no longer just a gene-editing tool; application areas catalytically impaired inactive Cas9, including gene regulation, epigenetic editing, chromatin engineering, imaging, exceed functionality WT Cas9. Here, we will present brief history tools describe wide range CRISPR-based genome-targeting tools. We conclude with future directions broader impact technologies.

Language: Английский

Citations

1458

Genomic imprinting disorders: lessons on how genome, epigenome and environment interact DOI
David Monk, Deborah Mackay, Thomas Eggermann

et al.

Nature Reviews Genetics, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 20(4), P. 235 - 248

Published: Jan. 15, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

359

CRISPR technologies for precise epigenome editing DOI
Muneaki Nakamura, Yuchen Gao, Antonia A. Dominguez

et al.

Nature Cell Biology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 23(1), P. 11 - 22

Published: Jan. 1, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

353

Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers DOI
Molly Gasperini, Jacob M. Tome, Jay Shendure

et al.

Nature Reviews Genetics, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 21(5), P. 292 - 310

Published: Jan. 27, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

319

CRISPR in cancer biology and therapy DOI Open Access
Alyna Katti, Bianca J. Diaz, Christina M. Caragine

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 22(5), P. 259 - 279

Published: Feb. 22, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

296

CRISPR/Cas9-Based Engineering of the Epigenome DOI Creative Commons
Julián Pulecio, Nipun Verma, Eva Mejía-Ramírez

et al.

Cell stem cell, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 21(4), P. 431 - 447

Published: Oct. 1, 2017

Language: Английский

Citations

252

Targeted mRNA demethylation using an engineered dCas13b-ALKBH5 fusion protein DOI Creative Commons
Jiexin Li, Zhuojia Chen, Feng Chen

et al.

Nucleic Acids Research, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 48(10), P. 5684 - 5694

Published: April 8, 2020

Abstract Studies on biological functions of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in mRNA have drawn significant attention recent years. Here we describe the construction and characterization a CRISPR–Cas13b-based tool for targeted demethylation specific mRNA. A fusion protein, named dm6ACRISPR, was created by linking catalytically inactive Type VI-B Cas13 enzyme from Prevotella sp. P5–125 (dPspCas13b) to m6A demethylase AlkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5). dm6ACRISPR specifically demethylates such as cytochrome b5 form (CYB5A) increase its stability. It can also demethylate β-catenin-encoding CTNNB1 that contains multiple sites trigger translation. In addition, system incurs efficient epitranscriptome transcripts with limited off-target effects. Targeted coding oncoproteins epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) MYC suppress proliferation cancer cells. Together, provide programmable vivo manipulation study genes their related functions.

Language: Английский

Citations

196

Systematic perturbation of retroviral LTRs reveals widespread long-range effects on human gene regulation DOI Creative Commons
Daniel Fuentes, Tomek Swigut, Joanna Wysocka

et al.

eLife, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 7

Published: Aug. 2, 2018

Recent work suggests extensive adaptation of transposable elements (TEs) for host gene regulation. However, high numbers integrations typical TEs, coupled with sequence divergence within families, have made systematic interrogation the regulatory contributions TEs challenging. Here, we employ CARGO, our recent method CRISPR gRNA multiplexing, to facilitate targeting LTR5HS, an ape-specific class HERVK (HML-2) LTRs that is active during early development and present in ~700 copies throughout human genome. We combine CARGO activation or interference to, respectively, induce silence LTR5HS en masse, demonstrate this system robustly targets vast majority insertions. Remarkably, activation/silencing associated reciprocal up- down-regulation hundreds genes. These effects require presence retroviral sequences, but occur over long genomic distances, consistent a pervasive function as embryonic enhancers apes.

Language: Английский

Citations

180

Gene editing and CRISPR in the clinic: current and future perspectives DOI Open Access
Matthew P. Hirakawa, Raga Krishnakumar, Jerilyn A. Timlin

et al.

Bioscience Reports, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 40(4)

Published: March 24, 2020

Genome editing technologies, particularly those based on zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector (TALENs), and CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat DNA sequences)/Cas9 are rapidly progressing into clinical trials. Most use of to date has focused ex vivo gene cells followed by their re-introduction back the patient. The approach is highly effective for many disease states, including cancers sickle cell disease, but ideally genome would also be applied diseases which require modification in vivo. However, technologies can confounded problems such as off-target editing, inefficient or delivery, stimulation counterproductive immune responses. Current research addressing these issues may provide new opportunities space. In this review, we examine current status scientific basis trials featuring ZFNs, TALENs, CRISPR-based known limitations humans, developing engineering space that should lay groundwork further translation application.

Language: Английский

Citations

167