Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: Dec. 1, 2018
Immunotherapy
is
at
the
forefront
of
modern
oncologic
care.
Various
novel
therapies
have
targeted
all
three
layers
tumor
biology:
tumor,
niche,
and
immune
system
with
a
range
promising
results.
One
emerging
class
in
both
primary
salvage
therapy
oncolytic
viruses.
This
offers
multimodal
approach
to
specifically
effectively
target
destroy
malignant
cells,
though
barrier
oncoviral
faced
limited
therapeutic
response
currently
delivery
techniques.
British Journal of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
118(1), P. 9 - 16
Published: Jan. 1, 2018
Immune
checkpoint
inhibitors
(ICI)
targeting
CTLA-4
and
the
PD-1/PD-L1
axis
have
shown
unprecedented
clinical
activity
in
several
types
of
cancer
are
rapidly
transforming
practice
medical
oncology.
Whereas
cytotoxic
chemotherapy
small
molecule
('targeted
therapies')
largely
act
on
cells
directly,
immune
reinvigorate
anti-tumour
responses
by
disrupting
co-inhibitory
T-cell
signalling.
While
resistance
routinely
develops
patients
treated
with
conventional
therapies
targeted
therapies,
durable
suggestive
long-lasting
immunologic
memory
commonly
seen
large
subsets
ICI.
However,
initial
response
appears
to
be
a
binary
event,
most
non-responders
single-agent
ICI
therapy
progressing
at
rate
consistent
natural
history
disease.
In
addition,
late
relapses
now
emerging
longer
follow-up
trial
populations,
suggesting
emergence
acquired
resistance.
As
robust
biomarkers
predict
and/or
remain
elusive,
mechanisms
underlying
innate
(primary)
(secondary)
inferred
from
pre-clinical
studies
correlative
data.
Improved
understanding
molecular
(and
resistance)
may
not
only
identify
novel
predictive
prognostic
biomarkers,
but
also
ultimately
guide
optimal
combination/sequencing
clinic.
Here
we
review
data
identifying
inhibition.
Genes & Development,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
32(17-18), P. 1105 - 1140
Published: Sept. 1, 2018
Despite
the
high
long-term
survival
in
localized
prostate
cancer,
metastatic
cancer
remains
largely
incurable
even
after
intensive
multimodal
therapy.
The
lethality
of
advanced
disease
is
driven
by
lack
therapeutic
regimens
capable
generating
durable
responses
setting
extreme
tumor
heterogeneity
on
genetic
and
cell
biological
levels.
Here,
we
review
available
model
systems,
genome
atlas,
cellular
functional
microenvironment,
tumor-intrinsic
tumor-extrinsic
mechanisms
underlying
resistance,
technological
advances
focused
detection
management.
These
advances,
along
with
an
improved
understanding
adaptive
to
conventional
therapies,
anti-androgen
therapy,
immunotherapy,
are
catalyzing
development
more
effective
strategies
for
disease.
In
particular,
knowledge
heterotypic
interactions
between
coevolution
host
cells
microenvironment
has
illuminated
novel
combinations
a
strong
potential
eventual
cures
Improved
management
will
also
benefit
from
artificial
intelligence-based
expert
decision
support
systems
proper
standard
care,
prognostic
determinant
biomarkers
minimize
overtreatment
disease,
new
standards
care
accelerated
next-generation
clinical
trials.
npj Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
4(1)
Published: Feb. 8, 2019
Abstract
Recent
advances
in
several
areas
are
rekindling
interest
and
enabling
progress
the
development
of
therapeutic
cancer
vaccines.
These
have
been
made
target
selection,
vaccine
technology,
methods
for
reversing
immunosuppressive
mechanisms
exploited
by
cancers.
Studies
testing
different
tumor
antigens
revealed
properties
that
yield
high
versus
normal
cell
specificity
adequate
immunogenicity
to
affect
clinical
efficacy.
A
few
tumor-associated
antigens,
host
proteins
abnormally
expressed
cells,
demonstrated
serve
as
good
targets
immunotherapies,
although
many
do
not
possess
needed
or
immunogenicity.
Neoantigens,
which
arise
from
mutated
truly
cancer-specific
can
be
highly
immunogenic,
though
vast
majority
unique
each
patient’s
thus
require
personalized
therapies.
Lessons
previous
expeditions
teaching
us
type
magnitude
immune
responses
needed,
well
technologies
achieve
these
responses.
For
example,
we
learning
approaches
elicit
potent,
balanced,
durable
CD4
plus
CD8
T
expansion
necessary
Exploration
interactions
between
system
has
elucidated
adaptations
enable
cells
suppress
evade
attack.
This
led
breakthroughs
new
drugs,
and,
subsequently,
opportunities
combine
with
vaccines
dramatically
increase
patient
Here
review
this
recent
progress,
highlighting
key
steps
bringing
promise
within
reach.
Cancer Discovery,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
7(7), P. 675 - 693
Published: June 20, 2017
DNA-damaging
agents
are
widely
used
in
clinical
oncology
and
exploit
deficiencies
tumor
DNA
repair.
Given
the
expanding
role
of
immune
checkpoint
blockade
as
a
therapeutic
strategy,
interaction
damage
with
system
has
recently
come
into
focus,
it
is
now
clear
that
repair
landscape
an
important
driving
response
to
blockade.
Here,
we
summarize
mechanisms
by
which
genomic
instability
have
been
found
shape
antitumor
describe
efforts
use
biomarkers
guide
immune-directed
therapies.
Cell Death and Disease,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
9(2)
Published: Jan. 25, 2018
Abstract
It
is
now
well
established
that
cancer
cells
co-exist
within
a
complex
environment
with
stromal
and
depend
for
their
growth
dissemination
on
tight
plastic
interactions
components
of
the
tumor
microenvironment
(TME).
Cancer
incite
formation
new
blood
lymphatic
vessels
from
preexisting
to
cope
high
nutrient/oxygen
demand
favor
outgrowth.
Research
over
past
decades
has
highlighted
crucial
role
played
by
tumor-associated
vasculature
in
supporting
immunoevasion
subverting
T-cell-mediated
immunosurveillance,
which
are
main
hallmarks
cancers.
The
structurally
functionally
aberrant
contributes
protumorigenic
immunosuppressive
TME
maintaining
cell’s
permissive
characterized
hypoxia,
acidosis,
interstitial
pressure,
while
simultaneously
generating
physical
barrier
T
cells'
infiltration.
Recent
research
moreover
shown
endothelial
forming
can
actively
suppress
recruitment,
adhesion,
activity
cells.
Likewise,
during
tumorigenesis
undergoes
dramatic
remodeling
facilitates
metastatic
spreading
immunosuppression.
Beyond
carcinogenesis,
erratic
been
recently
implicated
mechanisms
therapy
resistance,
including
those
limiting
efficacy
clinically
approved
immunotherapies,
such
as
immune
checkpoint
blockers
adoptive
T-cell
transfer.
In
this
review,
we
discuss
emerging
evidence
highlighting
major
thwarting
immunosurveillance
antitumor
immunity.
Moreover,
also
novel
therapeutic
approaches
targeting
potential
help
overcoming
immunotherapy
resistance.
Journal of Clinical Oncology,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
36(4), P. 383 - 390
Published: July 3, 2017
Purpose
Until
recently,
limited
options
existed
for
patients
with
advanced
melanoma
who
experienced
disease
progression
while
receiving
treatment
ipilimumab.
Here,
we
report
the
coprimary
overall
survival
(OS)
end
point
of
CheckMate
037,
which
has
previously
shown
that
nivolumab
resulted
in
more
achieving
an
objective
response
compared
chemotherapy
regimens
ipilimumab-refractory
melanoma.
Patients
and
Methods
were
stratified
by
programmed
death-ligand
1
expression,
BRAF
status,
best
prior
cytotoxic
T-lymphocyte
antigen-4
therapy
response,
then
randomly
assigned
2:1
to
3
mg/kg
intravenously
every
2
weeks
or
investigator’s
choice
(ICC;
dacarbazine
1,000
mg/m
carboplatin
area
under
curve
6
plus
paclitaxel
175
weeks).
treated
until
they
unacceptable
toxicity,
follow-up
approximately
years.
Results
Two
hundred
seventy-two
(99%
treated)
133
ICC
(77%
treated).
More
nivolumab-treated
had
brain
metastases
(20%
v
14%)
increased
lactate
dehydrogenase
levels
(52%
38%)
at
baseline;
41%
versus
11%
received
anti–programmed
death
agents
after
therapy.
Median
OS
was
16
months
14
(hazard
ratio,
0.95;
95.54%
CI,
0.73
1.24);
median
progression-free
3.1
3.7
months,
respectively
1.0;
95.1%
0.78
1.436).
Overall
rate
(27%
10%)
duration
(32
13
months)
notably
higher
ICC.
Fewer
grade
4
treatment-related
adverse
events
observed
on
(14%
34%).
Conclusion
Nivolumab
demonstrated
higher,
durable
responses
but
no
difference
should
be
interpreted
caution
as
it
likely
impacted
dropout
before
treatment,
led
crossover
group,
proportion
group
poor
prognostic
factors.