Clinical and Experimental Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: June 4, 2024
Abstract
Patients
with
hematologic
malignancies
(HMs)
are
at
a
significantly
higher
risk
of
contracting
COVID-19
and
experiencing
severe
outcomes
compared
to
individuals
without
HMs.
This
heightened
is
influenced
by
various
factors,
including
the
underlying
malignancy,
immunosuppressive
treatments,
patient-related
factors.
Notably,
regimens
commonly
used
for
HM
treatment
can
lead
depletion
B
cells
T
cells,
which
associated
increased
COVID-19-related
complications
mortality
in
these
patients.
As
pandemic
transitions
into
an
endemic
state,
it
remains
crucial
acknowledge
address
ongoing
In
this
review,
we
aim
summarize
current
evidence
enhance
our
understanding
impact
HMs
on
risks
outcomes,
identify
particularly
vulnerable
individuals,
emphasize
need
specialized
clinical
attention
management.
Furthermore,
impaired
immune
response
vaccination
observed
patients
underscores
importance
implementing
additional
mitigation
strategies.
may
include
targeted
prophylaxis
antivirals
monoclonal
antibodies
as
indicated.
To
provide
practical
guidance
considerations,
present
two
illustrative
cases
highlight
real-life
challenges
faced
physicians
caring
HMs,
emphasizing
individualized
management
based
disease
severity,
type,
unique
circumstances
each
patient.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
246, P. 108011 - 108011
Published: Jan. 9, 2024
The
study
addresses
the
need
for
strong
vaccine-induced
antibodies
against
SARS-CoV-2
in
immunocompromised
hematological
malignancy
(HM)
patients
to
reduce
COVID-19
severity.
Despite
vaccination
efforts,
over
a
third
of
HM
remain
unresponsive,
increasing
their
risk
severe
breakthrough
infections.
aims
leverage
machine
learning's
adaptability
dynamics,
efficiently
selecting
patient-specific
features
enhance
predictions
and
improve
healthcare
strategies.
Emphasizing
complex
COVID-hematology
connection,
focus
is
on
interpretable
learning
provide
valuable
insights
clinicians
biologists.
evaluated
dataset
with
more
than
1600
diseases.
output
was
achievement
or
non-achievement
serological
response
after
full
vaccination.
Various
methods
were
applied,
best
model
selected
based
metrics
like
Area
Under
Curve
(AUC)
score,
Sensitivity,
Specificity,
Matthew
Correlation
Coefficient
(MCC).
Individual
SHAP
values
obtained
model,
principal
component
analysis
(PCA)
applied
these
values.
patient
profiles
then
analyzed
within
identified
clusters.
Support
vector
(SVM)
emerged
as
best-performing
model.
PCA
SVM-derived
resulted
four
perfectly
separated
These
clusters,
ordered
by
probability
generating
antibodies.
clusters
characterized
respective
probabilities.
Cluster
1,
second-highest
(69.91%),
included
aggressive
diseases
factors
contributing
increased
immunodeficiency.
2
had
lowest
likelihood
(33.3%),
but
small
sample
size
limited
conclusive
findings.
3,
representing
majority
population,
exhibited
high
rate
antibody
generation
(84.39%)
better
prognosis
compared
1.
4,
66.33%,
B-cell
non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma
corticosteroid
therapy.
methodology
successfully
separate
suggests
methodology's
potential
applicability
other
diseases,
highlighting
importance
ML
research
decision-making.
International Journal of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
155(4), P. 618 - 626
Published: May 9, 2024
Immunocompromised
patients
are
at
high
risk
to
fail
clearance
of
SARS-CoV-2.
Prolonged
COVID-19
constitutes
a
health
and
management
problem
as
cancer
treatments
often
have
be
disrupted.
As
SARS-CoV-2
evolves,
new
variants
concern
emerged
that
evade
available
monoclonal
antibodies.
Moreover,
antiviral
therapy
promotes
escape
mutations,
particularly
in
immunocompromised
patients.
These
frequently
suffer
from
prolonged
infection.
No
successful
treatment
has
been
established
for
persistent
Here,
we
report
on
series
21
with
COVID-19-most
them
hematologic
malignancies-treated
plasma
obtained
recently
convalescent
or
vaccinated
donors
combination
thereof.
Repeated
dosing
SARS-CoV-2-antibody-containing
could
clear
infection
16
out
even
if
COVID-19-specific
failed
induce
sustained
viral
improve
clinical
course
Ten
were
major
responders
defined
an
increase
delta(d)Ct
>
=
5
after
the
first
administration
and/or
(C/VP).
On
average,
PCR
Ct
values
increased
median
value
22.55
(IQR
19.10-24.25)
29.57
27.55-34.63;
p
<.0001)
response
subgroup.
Furthermore,
when
treated
second
time
C/VP,
4
initial
nonresponders
showed
Ct-values
23.13
17.75-28.05)
32.79
31.75-33.75;
.013).
Our
results
suggest
C/VP
feasible
malignancies
who
did
not
respond
treatment.
Clinical and Experimental Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: June 4, 2024
Abstract
Patients
with
hematologic
malignancies
(HMs)
are
at
a
significantly
higher
risk
of
contracting
COVID-19
and
experiencing
severe
outcomes
compared
to
individuals
without
HMs.
This
heightened
is
influenced
by
various
factors,
including
the
underlying
malignancy,
immunosuppressive
treatments,
patient-related
factors.
Notably,
regimens
commonly
used
for
HM
treatment
can
lead
depletion
B
cells
T
cells,
which
associated
increased
COVID-19-related
complications
mortality
in
these
patients.
As
pandemic
transitions
into
an
endemic
state,
it
remains
crucial
acknowledge
address
ongoing
In
this
review,
we
aim
summarize
current
evidence
enhance
our
understanding
impact
HMs
on
risks
outcomes,
identify
particularly
vulnerable
individuals,
emphasize
need
specialized
clinical
attention
management.
Furthermore,
impaired
immune
response
vaccination
observed
patients
underscores
importance
implementing
additional
mitigation
strategies.
may
include
targeted
prophylaxis
antivirals
monoclonal
antibodies
as
indicated.
To
provide
practical
guidance
considerations,
present
two
illustrative
cases
highlight
real-life
challenges
faced
physicians
caring
HMs,
emphasizing
individualized
management
based
disease
severity,
type,
unique
circumstances
each
patient.