JCO Precision Oncology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
8
Published: March 1, 2024
PURPOSE
Trastuzumab
deruxtecan
is
a
new
treatment
option
for
patients
with
advanced
human
epidermal
growth
factor
receptor
2
(HER2)–low
breast
cancer
(BC).
Although
HER2-low
status
has
been
characterized
in
early
and
BC,
it
yet
to
be
fully
brain
metastases
(BrM).
METHODS
Patients
who
underwent
surgery
BC
BrM
at
Sunnybrook
Health
Sciences
Centre
whom
HER2
was
available
on
resected
were
studied.
Estrogen
receptor,
progesterone
assessed
the
basis
of
ASCO/College
American
Pathologists
(CAP)
guidelines.
HER2-zero
defined
as
immunohistochemistry
(IHC)
0;
IHC
1+
or
2+
fluorescence
situ
hybridization
(FISH)–negative
status.
HER2-positive
(HER2+)
3+
positive
FISH.
Clinicopathologic
features
recorded.
We
also
prognostic
association
between
extent
expression
(1)
brain-specific
progression-free
survival
(bsPFS),
well
(2)
overall
(OS).
RESULTS
In
this
retrospective
cohort
102
BrM,
53%
(n
=
54)
HER2+,
29.4%
30)
HER2-low,
17.6%
18)
had
Among
that
triple-negative
ASCO/CAP
guidelines,
63.6%
14/22)
reclassified
being
HER2-low.
Sixty
percent
15/25)
hormone
receptor–positive/HER2-negative
(HR+/HER2–)
total,
51
matched
primary
tissue
available;
results
when
categorized
HER2-zero,
HER2+
concordant
82.3%
42/51)
cases
(Cohen's
kappa,
0.58;
P
.07).
There
no
significant
either
bsPFS
OS.
CONCLUSION
surgically
high
proportion
those
metastatic
HR+/HER2–
disease
have
potential
benefit
from
HER2-targeted
therapy.
ESMO Open,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
9(7), P. 103619 - 103619
Published: June 28, 2024
The
characterization
and
comparison
of
gene
expression
intrinsic
subtype
(IS)
changes
induced
by
neoadjuvant
chemotherapy
(NACT)
endocrine
therapy
in
hormone
receptor-positive
(HR+)/human
epidermal
growth
factor
receptor
2
(HER2)-low
versus
HR+/HER2-0
breast
cancer
(BC)
has
not
been
conducted
so
far.
Most
evidence
on
the
association
HER2
status
with
pathologic
responses
prognosis
HR+/HER2-negative
BC
is
controversial
restricted
to
NACT-treated
disease.
Similarly,
a
temporal
heterogeneity
described
only
NACT.
Cancers,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(5), P. 1413 - 1413
Published: Feb. 23, 2023
We
examined
differences
in
HER2
expression
between
primary
tumors
and
distant
metastases,
particularly
within
the
HER2-negative
breast
cancer
cohort
(HER2-low
HER2-zero).
The
retrospective
study
included
191
consecutive
paired
samples
of
metastases
diagnosed
1995
2019.
were
divided
into
HER2-zero
(immunohistochemistry
[IHC]
score
0)
HER2-low
(IHC
1+
or
2+/in
situ
hybridization
[ISH]-negative).
main
objective
was
to
analyze
discordance
rate
matched
metastatic
samples,
focusing
on
site
metastasis,
molecular
subtype,
de
novo
cancer.
relationship
determined
by
cross-tabulation
calculation
Cohen's
Kappa
coefficient.
final
148
samples.
largest
proportion
[primary
tumor
61.4%
(n
=
78),
73.5%
86)].
status
corresponding
49.6%
63)
(Kappa
-0.003,
95%CI
-0.15-0.15).
Development
a
phenotype
occurred
most
frequently
52,
40.9%),
mostly
with
switch
from
34,
26.8%).
Relevant
rates
observed
different
sites
subtypes.
Primary
had
significantly
lower
than
secondary
[30.2%
0.48,
0.27-0.69)
versus
50.5%
0.14,
95%
CI
-0.03-0.32)].
This
highlights
importance
evaluating
potentially
therapy-relevant
metastases.
Nanomaterials,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(17), P. 2476 - 2476
Published: Sept. 1, 2023
Breast
cancer
represents
the
most
common
type
and
one
of
major
leading
causes
death
in
female
worldwide
population.
Overexpression
HER2,
a
transmembrane
glycoprotein
related
to
epidermal
growth
factor
receptor,
results
biologically
clinically
aggressive
breast
subtype.
It
is
also
primary
driver
for
tumor
detection
progression
and,
addition
being
an
important
prognostic
women
diagnosed
with
cancer,
HER2
widely
known
therapeutic
target
drug
development.
The
aim
this
review
provide
updated
overview
main
approaches
diagnosis
treatment
HER2-positive
proposed
literature
over
past
decade.
We
focused
on
different
targeting
strategies
involving
antibodies
peptides
that
have
been
explored
their
relative
outcomes
current
limitations
need
be
improved.
encompasses
discussion
targeted
acting
as
probes
molecular
imaging.
By
using
types
HER2-targeting
strategies,
nanotechnology
promises
overcome
some
clinical
challenges
by
developing
novel
HER2-guided
nanosystems
suitable
powerful
tools
imaging,
targeting,
therapy.
British Journal of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
129(8), P. 1274 - 1283
Published: Aug. 21, 2023
HER2-low
breast
cancers
(BC)
show
a
good
response
to
novel
anti-HER2
antibody-drug
conjugates
(ADCs)
in
advanced
setting.
Nevertheless,
little
is
known
about
the
response,
category
change,
and
prognosis
of
BC
receiving
neoadjuvant
treatment
(NAT).Consecutive
invasive
patients
who
underwent
≥
4
cycles
NAT
surgery
from
January
2009
December
2020
were
retrospectively
reviewed.
was
defined
as
IHC
1+
or
2+
FISH
negative.
Concordance
rates
HER2
other
biomarkers
analyzed
by
Kappa
test.
Kaplan-Meier
analysis
Cox
regression
used
assess
recurrence-free
interval
(RFI)
overall
survival
(OS).A
total
2489
included,
whom
1023
(41.1%)
had
tumors.
higher
ER
positivity
rate
than
HER2-0
(78.5%
vs.
63.6%,
P
<
0.001),
similar
pathological
complete
(pCR)
(20.6%
21.8%,
=
0.617).
Among
non-pCR
cases,
39.5%
tumors
changed
HER2-low,
14.3%
after
NAT.
Low
concordance
status
found
both
ER-positive
(Kappa
0.368)
ER-negative
0.444)
patients.
Primary
significantly
better
RFI
(P
0.014),
especially
among
subset
0.016).
Moreover,
change
associated
with
(adjusted
0.043).Compared
patients,
high
proportion
tumor
pCR
rate,
which
related
prognosis,
residual
cases
A
remarkable
instability
between
primary
tumor,
indicating
re-testing
new
era
ADCs
therapy.
Cancer,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
130(16), P. 2746 - 2762
Published: May 16, 2024
Abstract
Background
Breast
cancer
(BC)
in
women
aged
≤40
years
carrying
germline
pathogenetic
variants
(PVs)
BRCA1/2
genes
is
infrequent
but
often
associated
with
aggressive
features.
Human
epidermal
growth
factor
receptor
2
(HER2)‐low‐expressing
BC
has
recently
emerged
as
a
novel
therapeutic
target
not
been
characterized
this
rare
patient
subset.
Methods
Women
newly
diagnosed
early‐stage
HER2‐negative
(HER2‐0
and
HER2‐low)
PVs
from
78
health
care
centers
worldwide
were
retrospectively
included.
Chi‐square
test
Student
t
‐test
used
to
describe
variable
distribution
between
HER2‐0
HER2‐low.
Associations
HER2‐low
status
assessed
logistic
regression.
Kaplan–Meier
method
Cox
regression
analysis
assess
disease‐free
survival
(DFS)
overall
survival.
Statistical
significance
was
considered
for
p
≤
.05.
Results
Of
3547
included
patients,
32.3%
had
BC,
representing
46.3%
of
hormone
receptor–positive
21.3%
triple‐negative
(TN)
tumors.
vs.
more
grade
1/2
(
<
.001),
node‐positive
=
.003).
BRCA2
than
BRCA1
.001).
versus
showed
better
DFS
(hazard
ratio
[HR],
0.86;
95%
CI,
0.76–0.97)
the
population
favorable
(HR,
0.78;
0.64–0.95)
0.65;
0.46–0.93)
TN
subgroup.
Luminal
A–like
tumors
.014)
luminal
A‐like
.019)
worst
DFS.
Conclusions
In
young
patients
PVs,
disease
less
frequent
expected
frequently
linked
luminal‐like
disease.
modestly
improved
prognosis.
Histopathology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
85(6), P. 920 - 928
Published: July 29, 2024
Aims
Recently,
human
epidermal
growth
factor
2
(HER2)‐low
(i.e.
HER2
score
1+
or
2+
without
amplification)
breast
cancer
patients
became
eligible
for
trastuzumab–deruxtecan
treatment.
To
improve
assay
standardisation
and
detection
of
HER2‐low
in
a
quantitative
manner,
we
conducted
an
external
quality
assessment‐like
study
the
Netherlands.
Dynamic
range
cell
lines
immunohistochemistry
(IHC)
calibrators
were
used
to
quantify
expression
assess
interlaboratory
variability.
Methods
results
Three
blank
slides
with
dynamic
line
IHC
calibrator
stained
routine
assays
by
35
laboratories.
Four
different
antibody
clones
used:
19
(54.3%)
4B5,
six
(17.1%)
A0485,
five
(14.3%)
DG44
(HercepTest)
SP3.
Laboratories
two
kits
4B5
assays:
14
(73.7%)
ultraView
(26.3%)
OptiView.
Variability
lines,
measured
artificial
intelligence
software,
was
median
(min–max)
=
negative
core
0.5%
(0.0–57.0),
4.3%
(1.6–71.3),
42.8%
(30.4–92.6)
3+
96.2%
(91.8–98.8).
The
OptiView
had
highest
analytical
sensitivity,
closely
followed
ultraView.
SP3
least
sensitive.
Calibrators
A0485
not
analysable
due
background
staining.
Conclusions
As
validated
detecting
HER2‐amplified
tumours,
all
antibodies
proved
suitable
detection.
Some
tests
showed
distinct
line.
controls
analysis
using
demonstrated
more
variability
than
commonly
appreciated.
Revalidation
laboratories
is
needed
ensure
clinical
applicable
assays.