Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections DOI Open Access
Junhewk Kim

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 27(4), P. 177 - 196

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients public as key actors this validation process, article conducts a scoping review patient involvement (PPI) proposes model for their engagement. A search was conducted academic databases using keywords “AI” “patient involvement.” Out 114 studies were identified, 16 selected review; consisted four reviews, eight empirical studies, papers. The confirmed ongoing PPI AI, but highlighted lack detailed implementation strategies. This suggests participatory design, literacy, citizen science models potential approaches engagement, discussing possibilities limitations.

Language: Английский

Leading the AI transformation in schools: it starts with a digital mindset DOI Creative Commons
Marcus Pietsch, Dana-Kristin Mah

Educational Technology Research and Development, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 11, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Multinational validation of the Arabic version of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS) in university students DOI Creative Commons
Eva Hobeika, Rabih Hallit, Diana Malaeb

et al.

Cogent Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Sept. 4, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Meta AI Literacy Scale: Further validation and development of a short version DOI Creative Commons
Martin J. Koch, Astrid Carolus, Carolin Wienrich

et al.

Heliyon, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(21), P. e39686 - e39686

Published: Oct. 22, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Comment about ‘Medical, dental, and nursing students’ attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis’ DOI Creative Commons
Yoshiyasu Ito,

Hironobu Ikehara

BMC Medical Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: Nov. 19, 2024

We read with great interest the recently published article by Amiri et al., titled "Medical, Dental, and Nursing Students' Attitudes Knowledge Toward Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis." would like to offer comments on certain aspects of findings that we believe warrant further discussion.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Bridging the Maturity-Expectation Gap: Generative Ai in Strategic Decision-Making for Public R&D Interim Review DOI
Dohyoung Kim,

Seong-Woo Kang,

Ahreum Hong

et al.

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections DOI Open Access
Junhewk Kim

Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 27(4), P. 177 - 196

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients public as key actors this validation process, article conducts a scoping review patient involvement (PPI) proposes model for their engagement. A search was conducted academic databases using keywords “AI” “patient involvement.” Out 114 studies were identified, 16 selected review; consisted four reviews, eight empirical studies, papers. The confirmed ongoing PPI AI, but highlighted lack detailed implementation strategies. This suggests participatory design, literacy, citizen science models potential approaches engagement, discussing possibilities limitations.

Language: Английский

Citations

0