Procarbon-Soil—Procs: A Dynamic Soil Carbon Model for Improved Model-Data Compatibility in Carbon Farming DOI
L. G. Barioni, L. G. Barioni, Beatriz Aria Valladão

et al.

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Carbon farming trading schemes (CFTS) are emerging as a nature-based solution to contribute the mitigation of climate change by capturing carbon from atmosphere and storing it in plant-soil system soil organic (SOC). Increasing SOC for CFTS requires improved management practices, monitoring through sampling measurements, ex-ante economic evaluation. The implication is that needs be quantified reliably, i.e., compatible with measurements data validation certification under CFTS. Multicompartmental dynamic models (mSCDM) have been widely proposed assessing spatial temporal trajectories stocks. However, overly complex structure mSCDM means they prone overparameterization overfitting, poor performance unseen data, thus, not appropriate present paper addresses this gap describing development ProCarbon-Soil (PROCS) model, designed explicitly CTFS new context data-model fusion.PROCS holds same fundamental biophysical principles most applied SCDM has advantage improving adherence empirical shortening soil-plant system's state variables total stocks decomposability allow reducing number parameters needed.

Language: Английский

Input of high-quality litter reduces soil carbon losses due to priming in a subtropical pine forest DOI
Shiting Li, Maokui Lyu,

Cui Deng

et al.

Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 194, P. 109444 - 109444

Published: April 22, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

17

Soil depth gradients of organic carbon-13 – A review on drivers and processes DOI Creative Commons
N Krüger, Damien Finn, Axel Don

et al.

Plant and Soil, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 495(1-2), P. 113 - 136

Published: Nov. 11, 2023

Abstract Background and aims Soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics are vital in the context of climate change sustainable soil management. The ẟ 13 C signatures SOC powerful indicators tracers fluxes through soils transformation processes within soils. Depth gradients can be considered as their archive. However, many different drivers impact simultaneously, thus hampering interpretation. Methods Here we summarize current knowledge about drivers, sources determining δ matter along profiles. Results largest profiles (> 10‰) have been observed at sites where vegetation has shifted between C3 C4 plants, changing isotopic inputs. In without such changes, typically increase by 1–3‰ from topsoil to subsoil. Three main reasons for this (i) decreasing atmospheric CO 2 (Suess effect) led a depletion plant biomass 2.0‰ since 1850, (ii) increasing concentrations also depleted 1.8‰, (iii) fractionation occurs during continuous microbial recycling necromass accumulation. Moreover, greater mobility C-enriched hydrophilic dissolved other input may Conclusions External climatic affect signature inputs, stronger influence on compared internal processes.

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Microbial-mediated conversion of soil organic carbon co-regulates the evolution of antibiotic resistance DOI
Dandan Zhang, Houyu Li,

Qifan Yang

et al.

Journal of Hazardous Materials, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 471, P. 134404 - 134404

Published: April 26, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Understanding the mechanisms and potential pathways of soil carbon sequestration from the biogeochemistry perspective DOI

Xiaojuan Feng,

Guohua Dai,

Ting Liu

et al.

Science China Earth Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 67(11), P. 3386 - 3396

Published: Aug. 28, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Priming effects by cellulose inputs decrease with warming regardless of the decomposition stages of soil carbon pools DOI
Junjie Lin,

Guoxin Lan,

Zhenyu Yang

et al.

Plant and Soil, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 17, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Coupling of microbial-explicit model and machine learning improves the prediction and turnover process simulation of soil organic carbon DOI Creative Commons
Xuebin Xu, Xianting Wang,

Ping Zhou

et al.

Climate smart agriculture., Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 1(1), P. 100001 - 100001

Published: April 24, 2024

Modeling soil organic carbon (SOC) is helpful for understanding its distribution and turnover processes, which can guide the implementation of effective measures (C) sequestration enhance land productivity. Process-based simulation with high interpretability extrapolation, machine learning modeling flexibility are two common methods investigating SOC turnover. To take advantage both methods, we developed a hybrid model by coupling two-carbon pool microbial modeling. Here, assessed model's predictive, mapping, capabilities process on Ningbo region. The results indicate that density-dependence (β ​= ​2) biomass performed better in parameters microbial-based C cycle, such as use efficiency (CUE), mortality rate, assimilation rate. By integrating this optimal random forest (RF) model, improved prediction accuracy SOC, an increased R2 from 0.74 to 0.84, residual deviation 1.97 2.50, reduced root-mean-square error 4.65 3.67 ​g ​kg−1 compared conventional RF model. As result, predicted exhibited spatial variation provided abundant details. Microbial CUE potential input, represented net primary productivity, emerged factors driving Projections under CMIP6 SSP2-4.5 scenario revealed regional loss areas was mainly caused decreased induced climate change. Our findings highlight combining microbial-explicit improve understand feedback changing climate.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Bridging 20 Years of Soil Organic Matter Frameworks: Empirical Support, Model Representation, and Next Steps DOI Creative Commons
Katherine S. Rocci, Maurizio Cotrufo, Jessica G. Ernakovich

et al.

Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 129(6)

Published: June 1, 2024

Abstract In the past few decades, there has been an evolution in our understanding of soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics from one inherent biochemical recalcitrance to deriving plant‐microbe‐mineral interactions. This shift driven, part, by influential conceptual frameworks which put forth hypotheses about SOM dynamics. Here, we summarize several focal and derive them six controls related formation, (de)stabilization, loss. These include: (a) physical inaccessibility; (b) organo‐mineral ‐metal stabilization; (c) biodegradability plant inputs; (d) abiotic environmental factors; (e) reactivity diversity; (f) microbial physiology morphology. We then review empirical evidence for these controls, their model representation, outstanding knowledge gaps. find relatively strong support representation factors but disparities between data models diversity, stabilization, inputs, particularly with respect destabilization latter two controls. More research on inaccessibility morphology is needed deepen critical improve representation. The are highly interactive also present some inconsistencies may be reconciled considering methodological limitations or temporal spatial variation. Future must simultaneously refine at various scales within a hierarchical structure, while incorporating emerging insights. will advance ability accurately predict

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Greater influences of nitrogen addition on priming effect in forest subsoil than topsoil regardless of incubation warming DOI

Shaobo Yang,

Xuechao Zhao, Qingkui Wang

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 946, P. 174308 - 174308

Published: June 25, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Phosphorus limitation regulates the responses of microbial carbon metabolism to long-term combined additions of nitrogen and phosphorus in a cropland DOI
Shuailin Li, Yongxing Cui, Daryl Moorhead

et al.

Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 200, P. 109614 - 109614

Published: Oct. 11, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Thermodynamics of Microbial Decomposition of Persistent Carbon in Erosion-Buried Topsoils DOI Creative Commons
Ann D. Mitchell, Bobbi L. Helgason

Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 109710 - 109710

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0