Design and analysis of CRISPR–Cas experiments DOI
Ruth E. Hanna, John G. Doench

Nature Biotechnology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 38(7), P. 813 - 823

Published: April 13, 2020

Language: Английский

Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA DOI
Andrew V. Anzalone, Peyton B. Randolph, Jessie R. Davis

et al.

Nature, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 576(7785), P. 149 - 157

Published: Oct. 21, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

3636

Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors DOI
Andrew V. Anzalone, Luke W. Koblan, David R. Liu

et al.

Nature Biotechnology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 38(7), P. 824 - 844

Published: June 22, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

1822

CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing DOI Creative Commons
Kornel Labun, Tessa G. Montague, Maximilian Krause

et al.

Nucleic Acids Research, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 47(W1), P. W171 - W174

Published: May 6, 2019

Abstract The CRISPR–Cas system is a powerful genome editing tool that functions in diverse array of organisms and cell types. technology was initially developed to induce targeted mutations DNA, but has now been adapted target nucleic acids for range purposes. CHOPCHOP web identifying single guide RNA (sgRNA) targets. In this major update CHOPCHOP, we expand our toolbox beyond knockouts. We introduce functionality targeting with Cas13, which includes support alternative transcript isoforms accessibility predictions. incorporate new DNA modes, including CRISPR activation/repression, enrichment loci long-read sequencing, prediction Cas9 repair outcomes. Finally, results page visualization reveal downstream ATG sites, will aid users avoiding the expression truncated proteins. supports over 200 genomes have released command-line script running larger jobs handling unsupported genomes. v3 can be found at https://chopchop.cbu.uib.no

Language: Английский

Citations

1584

CRISPR-Based Therapeutic Genome Editing: Strategies and In Vivo Delivery by AAV Vectors DOI Creative Commons
Dan Wang, Feng Zhang, Guangping Gao

et al.

Cell, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 181(1), P. 136 - 150

Published: April 1, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

398

Unbiased detection of CRISPR off-targets in vivo using DISCOVER-Seq DOI
Beeke Wienert, Stacia K. Wyman, Chris D. Richardson

et al.

Science, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 364(6437), P. 286 - 289

Published: April 19, 2019

Spotting off-targets from gene editing Unintended genomic modifications limit the potential therapeutic use of gene-editing tools. Available methods to find generally do not work in vivo or detect single-nucleotide changes. Three papers this issue report new for monitoring tools (see Perspective by Kempton and Qi). Wienert et al. followed recruitment a DNA repair protein breaks induced CRISPR-Cas9, enabling unbiased detection off-target cellular animal models. Zuo identified without interference natural genetic heterogeneity injecting base editors into one blastomere two-cell mouse embryo leaving other genetically identical unedited. Jin performed whole-genome sequencing on individual, genome-edited rice plants identify unintended mutations. Cytosine, but adenine, numerous variants both rice. Science , p. 286 289 292 ; see also 234

Language: Английский

Citations

355

Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways DOI
Charles D. Yeh, Chris D. Richardson, Jacob E. Corn

et al.

Nature Cell Biology, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 21(12), P. 1468 - 1478

Published: Dec. 1, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

348

Prime editing for precise and highly versatile genome manipulation DOI
Peter J. Chen, David R. Liu

Nature Reviews Genetics, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 24(3), P. 161 - 177

Published: Nov. 7, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

333

The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining DOI
Bailin Zhao, Eli Rothenberg, Dale A. Ramsden

et al.

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 21(12), P. 765 - 781

Published: Oct. 19, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

306

Continuous evolution of SpCas9 variants compatible with non-G PAMs DOI
Shannon M. Miller, Tina Wang, Peyton B. Randolph

et al.

Nature Biotechnology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 38(4), P. 471 - 481

Published: Feb. 10, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

289

DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing DOI

Chaoyou Xue,

Eric C. Greene

Trends in Genetics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 37(7), P. 639 - 656

Published: April 22, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

273