Deep Learning Computer-aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi-center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT-CS Trial) DOI Creative Commons
Jeremy R. Glissen Brown, Nabil Mansour, Pu Wang

et al.

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 20(7), P. 1499 - 1507.e4

Published: Sept. 14, 2021

Background & AimsArtificial intelligence-based computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) systems are intended to address the issue of missed polyps during colonoscopy. The effect CADe screening and surveillance colonoscopy has not previously been studied in a United States (U.S.) population.MethodsWe conducted prospective, multi-center, single-blind randomized tandem study evaluate deep-learning based system (EndoScreener, Shanghai Wision AI, China). Patients were enrolled across 4 U.S. academic medical centers from 2019 through 2020. presenting for colorectal cancer or first high-definition white light (HDWL) first, followed immediately by other procedure fashion same endoscopist. primary outcome was adenoma miss rate (AMR), secondary outcomes included sessile serrated lesion (SSL) adenomas per (APC).ResultsA total 232 patients entered study, with 116 undergo HDWL first. After exclusion 9 patients, cohort 223 patients. AMR lower CADe-first group compared HDWL-first (20.12% [34/169] vs 31.25% [45/144]; odds ratio [OR], 1.8048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0780-3.0217; P = .0247). SSL (7.14% [1/14]) (42.11% [8/19]; .0482). First-pass APC higher (1.19 [standard deviation (SD), 2.03] 0.90 [SD, 1.55]; .0323). ADR 50.44% 43.64 % (P .3091).ConclusionIn this multicenter controlled trial, we demonstrate decrease an increase first-pass use CADe-system when alone. Artificial population. We (APC). A .3091). In

Language: Английский

AI in health and medicine DOI
Pranav Rajpurkar, Emma Chen,

Oishi Banerjee

et al.

Nature Medicine, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 28(1), P. 31 - 38

Published: Jan. 1, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

1483

Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision DOI Creative Commons
Andre Esteva, Katherine Chou, Serena Yeung

et al.

npj Digital Medicine, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 4(1)

Published: Jan. 8, 2021

Abstract A decade of unprecedented progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated the potential for many fields—including medicine—to benefit from insights that AI techniques can extract data. Here we survey recent development modern computer vision techniques—powered by deep learning—for medical applications, focusing on imaging, video, and clinical deployment. We start briefly summarizing a convolutional neural networks, including tasks they enable, context healthcare. Next, discuss several example imaging applications stand to benefit—including cardiology, pathology, dermatology, ophthalmology–and propose new avenues continued work. then expand into general highlighting ways which workflows integrate enhance care. Finally, challenges hurdles required real-world deployment these technologies.

Language: Английский

Citations

885

Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Ravi Aggarwal, Viknesh Sounderajah, Guy Martin

et al.

npj Digital Medicine, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 4(1)

Published: April 7, 2021

Deep learning (DL) has the potential to transform medical diagnostics. However, diagnostic accuracy of DL is uncertain. Our aim was evaluate algorithms identify pathology in imaging. Searches were conducted Medline and EMBASE up January 2020. We identified 11,921 studies, which 503 included systematic review. Eighty-two studies ophthalmology, 82 breast disease 115 respiratory for meta-analysis. Two hundred twenty-four other specialities qualitative Peer-reviewed that reported on using imaging included. Primary outcomes measures accuracy, study design reporting standards literature. Estimates pooled random-effects In AUC's ranged between 0.933 1 diagnosing diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration glaucoma retinal fundus photographs optical coherence tomography. imaging, 0.864 0.937 lung nodules or cancer chest X-ray CT scan. For 0.868 0.909 mammogram, ultrasound, MRI digital tomosynthesis. Heterogeneity high extensive variation methodology, terminology outcome noted. This can lead an overestimation There immediate need development artificial intelligence-specific EQUATOR guidelines, particularly STARD, order provide guidance around key issues this field.

Language: Английский

Citations

574

AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning DOI Open Access
Isabella Castiglioni, Leonardo Rundo, Marina Codari

et al.

Physica Medica, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 83, P. 9 - 24

Published: March 1, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

497

Minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling: the MI-CLAIM checklist DOI
Beau Norgeot, Giorgio Quer, Brett K. Beaulieu‐Jones

et al.

Nature Medicine, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 26(9), P. 1320 - 1324

Published: Sept. 1, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

425

Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning DOI Creative Commons
Alexander D’Amour, Katherine Heller, Dan Moldovan

et al.

arXiv (Cornell University), Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2020

ML models often exhibit unexpectedly poor behavior when they are deployed in real-world domains. We identify underspecification as a key reason for these failures. An pipeline is underspecified it can return many predictors with equivalently strong held-out performance the training domain. Underspecification common modern pipelines, such those based on deep learning. Predictors returned by pipelines treated equivalent their domain performance, but we show here that behave very differently deployment This ambiguity lead to instability and model practice, distinct failure mode from previously identified issues arising structural mismatch between this problem appears wide variety of practical using examples computer vision, medical imaging, natural language processing, clinical risk prediction electronic health records, genomics. Our results need explicitly account modeling intended any

Language: Английский

Citations

368

How medical AI devices are evaluated: limitations and recommendations from an analysis of FDA approvals DOI
Eric Q. Wu, Kevin Wu, Roxana Daneshjou

et al.

Nature Medicine, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 27(4), P. 582 - 584

Published: April 1, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

360

The next generation of evidence-based medicine DOI Open Access
Vivek Subbiah

Nature Medicine, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 29(1), P. 49 - 58

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

349

Artificial intelligence for multimodal data integration in oncology DOI Creative Commons
Jana Lipková, Richard J. Chen, Bowen Chen

et al.

Cancer Cell, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 40(10), P. 1095 - 1110

Published: Oct. 1, 2022

In oncology, the patient state is characterized by a whole spectrum of modalities, ranging from radiology, histology, and genomics to electronic health records. Current artificial intelligence (AI) models operate mainly in realm single modality, neglecting broader clinical context, which inevitably diminishes their potential. Integration different data modalities provides opportunities increase robustness accuracy diagnostic prognostic models, bringing AI closer practice. are also capable discovering novel patterns within across suitable for explaining differences outcomes or treatment resistance. The insights gleaned such can guide exploration studies contribute discovery biomarkers therapeutic targets. To support these advances, here we present synopsis methods strategies multimodal fusion association discovery. We outline approaches interpretability directions AI-driven through interconnections. examine challenges adoption discuss emerging solutions.

Language: Английский

Citations

342

Harnessing multimodal data integration to advance precision oncology DOI
Kevin M. Boehm, Pegah Khosravi, R. Vanguri

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 22(2), P. 114 - 126

Published: Oct. 18, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

333