Dynamics and triggers of misinformation on vaccines DOI Creative Commons
Emanuele Brugnoli, Marco Delmastro

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 20(1), P. e0316258 - e0316258

Published: Jan. 15, 2025

The Covid-19 pandemic has sparked renewed attention to the risks of online misinformation, emphasizing its impact on individuals’ quality life through spread health-related myths and misconceptions. In this study, we analyze 6 years (2016–2021) Italian vaccine debate across diverse social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube), encompassing all major news sources–both questionable reliable. We first use symbolic transfer entropy analysis production time-series dynamically determine which category sources, or reliable, causally drives agenda vaccines. Then, leveraging deep learning models capable accurately classify vaccine-related content based conveyed stance discussed topic, respectively, evaluate focus various topics by sources promoting opposing views compare resulting user engagement. Our study uncovers misinformation not as a parasite ecosystem that merely opposes perspectives offered mainstream media, but an autonomous force even overwhelming from latter. While pervasiveness is evident in significantly higher engagement compared reliable ones (up 11 times median value), our findings underscore need for consistent thorough pro-vax coverage counter imbalance. This especially important sensitive topics, where risk spreading potentially exacerbating negative attitudes toward vaccines higher. have successfully promoted efficacy, reducing anti-vax impact, gaps safety led highest with content.

Language: Английский

Tackling misinformation with games: a systematic literature review DOI Creative Commons
Kristian Kiili, Juho Siuko, Manuel Ninaus

et al.

Interactive Learning Environments, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 16

Published: Jan. 3, 2024

Misinformation and fake news are severe threats to society. The role of critical reading skills is crucial in the battle against misinformation. Despite promising results game-based interventions mitigate effects misinformation, corpus research on games supporting needs an overview. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted analyze how have been used tackle misinformation reveal game design trends. A total 15 papers eventually met defined inclusion criteria were analyzed. revealed that use education had emerged recently focused mainly news. Most grounded inoculation theory consequently designed expose players weakened doses manipulation techniques build resistance them. So far, studied informal settings with adult participants. median sample size 196, playing time min across studies reported papers. Although all reviewed positive outcomes, learning domain not yet mature enough generalize findings.

Language: Английский

Citations

11

The Misleading count: an identity-based intervention to counter partisan misinformation sharing DOI Creative Commons
Clara Pretus,

Ali Javeed,

Diána Hughes

et al.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 379(1897)

Published: Jan. 21, 2024

Interventions to counter misinformation are often less effective for polarizing content on social media platforms. We sought overcome this limitation by testing an identity-based intervention, which aims promote accuracy incorporating normative cues directly into the user interface. Across three pre-registered experiments in US ( N = 1709) and UK 804), we found that crowdsourcing judgements adding a Misleading count (next Like count) reduced participants' reported likelihood share inaccurate information about partisan issues 25% (compared with control condition). The was also more when it reflected in-group norms (from fellow Democrats/Republicans) compared of general users, though effect absent politically polarized context (UK). Moreover, intervention roughly five times as another popular (i.e. nudge sharing 5%). Extreme partisanship did not undermine effectiveness intervention. Our results suggest interventions based science can be than identity-neutral alternatives contexts (e.g. US). This article is part theme issue ‘Social norm change: drivers consequences’.

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review DOI Creative Commons
Mahnoor Malik,

Natasha Bauer-Maison,

Giuliana Guarna

et al.

Medical Principles and Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 33(3), P. 232 - 241

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

The objectives of this study were to identify common social media misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, explain the spread misinformation, and solutions guide clinical practice policy.

Language: Английский

Citations

10

“Inoculation” to Resist Misinformation DOI
Sander van der Linden, Jon Roozenbeek

JAMA, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 331(22), P. 1961 - 1961

Published: May 16, 2024

This JAMA Insights in the Communicating Medicine series explores concept of “prebunking,” a psychological inoculation technique that could help prevent spread misinformation.

Language: Английский

Citations

9

Dynamics and triggers of misinformation on vaccines DOI Creative Commons
Emanuele Brugnoli, Marco Delmastro

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 20(1), P. e0316258 - e0316258

Published: Jan. 15, 2025

The Covid-19 pandemic has sparked renewed attention to the risks of online misinformation, emphasizing its impact on individuals’ quality life through spread health-related myths and misconceptions. In this study, we analyze 6 years (2016–2021) Italian vaccine debate across diverse social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube), encompassing all major news sources–both questionable reliable. We first use symbolic transfer entropy analysis production time-series dynamically determine which category sources, or reliable, causally drives agenda vaccines. Then, leveraging deep learning models capable accurately classify vaccine-related content based conveyed stance discussed topic, respectively, evaluate focus various topics by sources promoting opposing views compare resulting user engagement. Our study uncovers misinformation not as a parasite ecosystem that merely opposes perspectives offered mainstream media, but an autonomous force even overwhelming from latter. While pervasiveness is evident in significantly higher engagement compared reliable ones (up 11 times median value), our findings underscore need for consistent thorough pro-vax coverage counter imbalance. This especially important sensitive topics, where risk spreading potentially exacerbating negative attitudes toward vaccines higher. have successfully promoted efficacy, reducing anti-vax impact, gaps safety led highest with content.

Language: Английский

Citations

1