Misspellings or “miscellings”—Non‐verifiable and unknown cell lines in cancer research publications
International Journal of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
155(7), P. 1278 - 1289
Published: May 15, 2024
Abstract
Reproducible
laboratory
research
relies
on
correctly
identified
reagents.
We
have
previously
described
gene
papers
with
wrongly
nucleotide
sequence(s),
including
studying
miR‐145
.
Manually
verifying
reagent
identities
in
36
recent
found
that
56%
and
17%
of
misidentified
sequences
cell
lines,
respectively.
also
5
line
identifiers
18
published
elsewhere,
did
not
represent
indexed
human
lines.
These
23
were
as
non‐verifiable
(NV),
their
unclear.
Studying
420
mentioned
8
NV
identifier(s)
235
(56%)
referred
to
7
(BGC‐803,
BSG‐803,
BSG‐823,
GSE‐1,
HGC‐7901,
HGC‐803,
MGC‐823)
independent
could
find
any
publications
describing
how
these
lines
established.
Six
sourced
from
repositories
externally
accessible
online
catalogs,
but
claimed.
Some
stated
short
tandem
repeat
(STR)
profiles
had
been
generated
for
three
yet
no
STR
be
identified.
In
summary,
new
challenges
integrity
reproducibility,
further
investigations
are
required
clarify
status
identities.
Language: Английский
Visual word identification beyond common words: The role of font and letter case in brand names
Memory & Cognition,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
52(7), P. 1673 - 1686
Published: May 9, 2024
Abstract
While
abstractionist
theories
of
visual
word
recognition
propose
that
perceptual
elements
like
font
and
letter
case
are
filtered
out
during
lexical
access,
instance-based
allow
for
the
possibility
these
surface
details
influence
this
process.
To
disentangle
accounts,
we
focused
on
brand
names
embedded
in
logotypes.
The
consistent
presentation
may
render
them
much
more
susceptible
to
factors
than
common
words.
In
present
study,
compared
original
modified
logos,
varying
or
case.
Experiment
1,
participants
decided
whether
stimuli
corresponded
existing
not,
regardless
graphical
information.
2,
had
categorize
semantically
–
they
a
transportation
sector
not.
Both
experiments
showed
longer
response
times
names,
letter-case
changes.
These
findings
challenge
notion
only
abstract
units
drive
recognition.
Instead,
favor
those
models
assume
that,
under
some
circumstances,
traces
memory
contain
Language: Английский
Tracking the brain signature of (mis)spelled logotypes via letter transpositions and replacements
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
All
leading
models
of
visual
word
recognition
assume
a
hierarchical
process
that
progressively
converts
the
input
into
abstract
letter
and
representations.
However,
results
from
recent
behavioral
studies
suggest
mental
representations
words
with
highly
consistent
format,
such
as
logotypes,
may
comprise
not
only
purely
information
but
also
perceptual
information.
This
hypothesis
would
explain
why
participants
often
misperceive
transposed-letter
misspellings
original
base
to
larger
degree
in
logotypes
(e.g.,
SASMUNG,
SARVUNG,
is
perceived
SAMSUNG)
than
common
words.
The
present
experiment
examined
electrophysiological
signature
behind
identification
correctly
spelled
misspelled
(via
transposition
or
replacement)
an
ERP
go/no-go
semantic
categorization
experiment.
Results
showed
N400
amplitudes
for
(SASMUNG)
intact
(SAMSUNG)
did
differ
significantly
across
various
time
windows
(until
600
ms),
whereas
replacement-letter
(SARVUNG)
yielded
consistently
amplitudes.
These
findings
reveal
are
particularly
resistant
minor
orthographic
changes,
which
has
important
theoretical
applied
marketing)
implications.
Language: Английский
Dissociating the Effects of Visual Similarity for Brand Names and Common Words
Journal of Cognition,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
7(1), P. 67 - 67
Published: Aug. 28, 2024
Abstractionist
models
of
visual
word
recognition
can
easily
accommodate
the
absence
similarity
effects
in
misspelled
common
words
(e.g.,
Language: Английский
Misspellings or “miscellings”-non-verifiable cell lines in cancer research publications
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 6, 2024
Abstract
Reproducible
laboratory
research
relies
on
correctly
identified
reagents.
We
have
previously
described
human
gene
papers
with
wrongly
nucleotide
sequence
reagent(s),
including
studying
miR-145
.
Manually
verifying
reagent
identities
in
more
recent
found
20/36
(56%)
and
6/36
(17%)
misidentified
reagent(s)
cell
line(s),
respectively.
also
5
line
identifiers
two
sequences
lines,
18
published
elsewhere
that
did
not
correspond
to
indexed
lines.
These
were
as
non-verifiable,
their
appeared
uncertain.
Studying
420
mentioned
8
different
non-verifiable
identifier(s)
235
refer
BGC-803,
BSG-803,
BSG-823,
GSE-1,
HGC-7901,
HGC-803
and/or
MGC-823
independent
could
find
publications
describing
how
these
lines
established,
they
claimed
externally
accessible
repositories.
While
some
stated
STR
profiles
had
been
generated
for
GSE-1
cells,
no
identified.
In
summary,
represent
new
challenges
reproducibility
require
further
investigation
clarify
identities.
Novelty
Impact
Statement
Through
publications,
our
team
23
identifiers,
most
of
which
misspellings
contaminated
cancer
Of
studied
detail,
7
unexpectedly
referred
across
publications.
therefore
describe
a
process
“miscelling”,
where
lack
descriptions
cannot
be
external
repositories
profiles.
Language: Английский