
Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Oct. 15, 2024
Language: Английский
Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Oct. 15, 2024
Language: Английский
BMJ Open, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1), P. e085853 - e085853
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Objectives To elucidate the incidence of myopia, progression refractive error, axial length (AL) elongation and factors associated with myopia in secondary school students Vietnam. Design Prospective cohort study. Settings Hue Healthy Adolescent Cohort Study, City, Participants 3-year longitudinal data were available for 355 (mean age 11.60±0.36, 46.8% girls). Noncycloplegic refraction AL measurements performed at baseline follow-up examinations. Primary outcome measures The primary outcomes progression. Myopia, emmetropia hyperopia defined as spherical equivalent (SE)≤−1.0 diopters (D), −0.5 D<SE < +0.5 D SE ≥ right eye, respectively. cumulative was proportion who not myopic but subsequently developed during period. Factors analysed using logistic linear regression models, Results Baseline mean −0.94±1.66 23.36±0.93 mm, annual incidences 40.6% 12.5%, Spending more time outdoors a significantly decreased (adjusted OR 0.499; 95% CI: 0.329–0.757), less (β=0.337; 0.254, 0.640) slower (β=−0.289; −0.202 to –0.071). In contrast, study computers greater (β=−0.184; −0.699 –0.112) (β=0.208; 0.062, 0.263). Conclusion This assessment revealed both identified myopia-risk myopia-protective behavioural Vietnamese students. results highlight high prevalence considerable need further effective strategies reduce risk by managing computer increasing outdoor time.
Language: Английский
Citations
0European Journal of Pediatrics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 184(2)
Published: Feb. 5, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0JAMA Network Open, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8(2), P. e2460026 - e2460026
Published: Feb. 21, 2025
Importance The association of digital screen time with myopia has been documented, but the dose-response and safe exposure threshold remain unclear. Objective To evaluate spent on screens risk. Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for full-length articles from peer-reviewed journals without restrictions study design, publication date, or language inception to November 25, 2024. Study Selection Primary research investigating devices (ie, smartphones, tablets, game consoles, computers, television) myopia-related outcomes prevalent incident rate progression) identified by reviewers. Extraction Synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardized procedure in accordance Meta-Analysis Observational Studies Epidemiology (MOOSE) Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. A random-effects, meta-analysis (DRMA) was utilized examine pattern myopia. Main Outcome Measures Increased odds per hour daily time. Results In linear DRMA 45 studies 335 524 participants (mean [SD] age, 9.3 [4.3] years), an additional associated higher (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.13-1.30). nonlinear 34 314 910 also indicated increasing time, ranging 1 (OR, 1.05; 1.01-1.09) 4 hours 1.97; 1.56-2.40). curve showed risk significantly between then rising more gradually after hours. Conclusions Relevance this systematic review DRMA, 1-hour increment 21% exhibited sigmoidal shape, indicating potential safety less than day exposure, increase up These findings can offer guidance clinicians researchers regarding
Language: Английский
Citations
0Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 292, P. 117947 - 117947
Published: Feb. 26, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0BMC Public Health, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 25(1)
Published: April 1, 2025
This study aimed to systematically evaluate the dose-response relationships between physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior(SB) (including near work [NW] and screen time [ST]), sleep duration (SD), myopia risk among children adolescents. Systematic review meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science up November 19, 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) ROBINS-I tools. Random-effects meta-analyses were used estimate categorical continuous relationships. Subgroup analyses sensitivity performed explore heterogeneity sources test robustness. A total 45 observational studies (766,848 participants aged 5–19 years) included. Categorical showed that, compared with lowest exposure categories, higher PA levels (highest: OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63–0.96; intermediate: 0.76, 0.63–0.93) longer SD 0.67, 0.48–0.92; 0.82, 0.73–0.92) significantly reduced risk. Conversely, NW 1.71, 1.28–2.27; 1.34, 1.19–1.50) ST 1.59, 1.14–2.22; 1.29, 1.12–1.49) associated increased In meta-analysis, a linear association observed PA, ST, myopia. Each additional hour per day by 12%, while each 31%. Nonlinear associations found NW, SD, Among adolescents, 1.5 2.5 h/day 25% 29%, respectively. Although myopia, this effect did not reach statistical significance at any level.Subgroup revealed that protective effects more evident in low- middle-income countries, smaller sample sizes, cross-sectional studies, risks related stronger low-income settings. No subgroup modified Increasing limiting effectively reduces The remains inconclusive, warranting further investigation.
Language: Английский
Citations
0BMJ Open, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(4), P. e089431 - e089431
Published: April 1, 2025
Objectives This cross-sectional study aimed to assess parents’ knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) towards myopia amidst increased children’s online course participation during the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially impacting visual health. Design The adopted a design analyse parent KAP regarding myopia. Setting participants Conducted from 19 August 2022 October 2022, in Jinan High-tech District, included 3261 participants, comprising 800 males (24.5%). Interventions A self-administered questionnaire assessed KAP, with good defined as score >75% of total. Primary secondary outcome measures scores were primary measures. factors associated also investigated. Results Parents had mean 10.2±2.4 (10.2/14=72.9%), 41.8±4.9 (41.8/50=83.6%) 54.3±7.1 (54.3/65=83.5%), respectively. knowledge (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06 1.16, p<0.001), 1.15, 1.12 1.17, daily outdoor activities time (30–60 min: OR 1.46, 1.16 1.84, p=0.001; 1–2 hours: 1.92, 1.48 2.49, p<0.001; >2 1.91, 1.34 2.74, p<0.001, respectively), parents whose children did not have progression class 1.43, 1.05 1.96, p=0.024) independently >75%, while child fourth grade school 0.76, 0.58 0.99, p=0.042), unaware child’s 0.52, 0.43 0.64, p=0.002) electronics usage hours 0.53, p<0.001) ≤75%. Conclusions found that showed suboptimal positive proactive concerning prevention pandemic. Areas requiring improvement include better education for 4 students, awareness their status addressing excessive electronic device use among children.
Language: Английский
Citations
0PharmacoEconomics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Nov. 12, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Oct. 15, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0