Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
39(1), P. 33 - 34
Published: Dec. 23, 2024
We
read
with
great
interest
the
article
by
Scope
et
al.1
The
study,
performed
experts
from
International
Skin
Imaging
Collaboration
(ISIC),
addresses
a
critical
need
in
dermatology:
development
of
standardized
terminology
for
skin
neoplasms.
As
diagnostic
challenges
increase
advances
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
and
molecular
pathology,
common
lexicon
is
essential
clinical
communication,
research
AI
model
training.
By
using
modified
Delphi
consensus
approach,
authors
have
created
comprehensive,
hierarchically
organized
system
terms
neoplasms,
which
offers
substantial
implications
practice
future
applications.
Historically,
dermatology
has
lacked
unified
complicates
diagnoses,
especially
when
benign,
malignant
indeterminate
lesions
share
overlapping
features.
With
increasing
use
dermatology,
precise
consistent
more
important
than
ever.
Structured
data
training
algorithms,
imprecise
could
hinder
their
effectiveness.
A
enhances
facilitates
underpins
accurate
tools.2,
3
employed
process,
gathering
input
18
across
three
rounds
to
refine
comprehensive
set
proposed
terms:
during
this
suggest
modifying,
deleting
or
adding
terms.
This
iterative
approach
ensures
broad
agreement
flexibility
incorporating
expert
insights.
hierarchical
mapping
into
super-categories
(i.e.
'benign',
'malignant'
'indeterminate')
cellular/tissue-differentiation
categories
(e.g.
'melanocytic'
'keratinocytic')
increases
utility
settings,
providing
framework
systems
decision
support.
Overall,
94%
379
reached
first
round,
demonstrates
reliability
process.
Most
requiring
further
refinement
belonged
'indeterminate'
super-category
(which
displayed
far
lower
among
experts),
signalling
complexity
certain
diagnoses
continued
refinement.
Importantly,
process
underscores
dynamic,
adaptable
that
can
evolve
alongside
new
scientific
findings
practices.4
final
taxonomy
includes
362
terms,
mapped
41
categories.
structure
classification
ranging
benign
conditions
like
seborrheic
keratosis
ones
such
as
melanoma.
feel
one
advantages
study
was
'intermediate'
super-category,
contrary
many
previous
investigations
on
neoplasm
diagnosis
simpler
dichotomic
('benign
versus
malignant').5
key
strength
work
its
potential
inform
AI-based
systems.
models
require
large,
annotated
datasets
learn
improve.
developed
here
serve
reference
point
ensuring
they
operate
framework.
Incorporating
these
improve
accuracy
identifying
classifying
ultimately
enhancing
precision
patient
outcomes.2,
4
Furthermore,
nature
will
support
making
nuanced
decisions,
particularly
complex
ambiguous
cases.
In
conclusion,
creation
neoplasms
an
milestone
wide-reaching
applications
practice,
development.
ISIC's
consensus-driven
provides
structured,
expert-backed
terminology,
while
paving
way
tools.
Though
validation
periodic
updates
are
necessary,
poised
streamline
innovations
enhance
global
collaboration
dermatologic
care.
We,
therefore,
congratulate
brilliant
effort,
be
undoubtfully
beneficial
whole
community
future.
None.
would
thank
Professor
Véronique
del
Marmol
Pietro
Rubegni
continuous
None
declare.
Data
sharing
not
applicable
no
were
generated
analysed
current
study.
npj Digital Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: Aug. 7, 2024
This
study
evaluates
multimodal
AI
models'
accuracy
and
responsiveness
in
answering
NEJM
Image
Challenge
questions,
juxtaposed
with
human
collective
intelligence,
underscoring
AI's
potential
current
limitations
clinical
diagnostics.
Anthropic's
Claude
3
family
demonstrated
the
highest
among
evaluated
models,
surpassing
average
accuracy,
while
decision-making
outperformed
all
models.
GPT-4
Vision
Preview
exhibited
selectivity,
responding
more
to
easier
questions
smaller
images
longer
questions.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
20(1), P. e0316732 - e0316732
Published: Jan. 24, 2025
To
evaluate
the
diagnostic
accuracy
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
assisted
radiologists
and
standard
double-reading
in
real-world
clinical
settings
for
rib
fractures
(RFs)
detection
on
CT
images.
This
study
included
243
consecutive
chest
trauma
patients
(mean
age,
58.1
years;
female,
166)
with
scans.
All
scans
were
interpreted
by
two
radiologists.
The
images
re-evaluated
primary
readers
AI
assistance
a
blinded
manner.
Reference
standards
established
musculoskeletal
re-evaluation
results
then
compared
those
from
initial
double-reading.
analysis
focused
demonstrate
superiority
AI-assisted
sensitivity
noninferiority
specificity
at
patient
level,
to
Secondary
endpoints
lesion
levels.
Stand-alone
performance
was
also
assessed.
influence
characteristics,
report
time,
RF
features
investigated.
At
significantly
improved
25.0%
(95%
CI:
10.5,
39.5;
P
<
0.001
superiority),
double-reading,
69.2%
94.2%.
And,
diagnosis
(100%)
noninferior
(98.2%)
difference
1.8%
-3.8,
7.4;
=
0.999
noninferiority).
both
influenced
gender,
number,
fracture
location,
type.
Radiologist
affected
whereas
AI’s
age
side
involved.
additional-reader
workflow
might
be
feasible
strategy
instead
traditional
potentially
offering
higher
real-word
practice.
Bioengineering,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(8), P. 758 - 758
Published: July 26, 2024
There
has
been
growing
scientific
interest
in
the
research
field
of
deep
learning
techniques
applied
to
skin
cancer
diagnosis
last
decade.
Though
encouraging
data
have
globally
reported,
several
discrepancies
observed
terms
study
methodology,
result
presentations
and
validation
clinical
settings.
The
present
review
aimed
screen
literature
on
application
DL
dermoscopic
melanoma/nevi
differential
extrapolate
those
original
studies
adequately
by
reporting
a
model,
comparing
them
among
clinicians
and/or
another
architecture.
second
aim
was
examine
together
according
standard
set
statistical
measures,
third
provide
dermatologists
with
comprehensive
explanation
definition
most
used
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
better/further
understand
this
topic
and,
parallel,
be
updated
newest
applications
medical
dermatologic
field,
along
historical
perspective.
After
screening
nearly
2000
records,
subset
54
selected.
Comparing
20
convolutional
neural
network
(CNN)/deep
(DCNN)
models,
we
scenario
highly
performant
algorithms,
especially
low
false
positive
results,
average
values
accuracy
(83.99%),
sensitivity
(77.74%),
specificity
(80.61%).
Looking
at
comparison
diagnoses
(13
studies),
main
difference
relies
values,
+15.63%
increase
for
CNN/DCNN
models
(average
84.87%)
compared
humans
64.24%)
14,85%
gap
accuracy;
were
comparable
(79.77%
79.78%
humans).
To
obtain
higher
diagnostic
feasibility
practice,
rather
than
experimental
retrospective
settings,
future
should
based
large
dataset
integrating
images
relevant
anamnestic
that
is
prospectively
tested
physicians.
Frontiers in Digital Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
7
Published: Feb. 25, 2025
With
the
proliferation
of
AI
enabled
tools
in
healthcare,
clinicians
have
raised
concerns
about
potential
for
bias
and
subsequent
negative
impacts
on
underrepresented
groups
(1).
The
causes
model
deployment
are
multifaceted
can
occur
throughout
development
process
(2).
A
well-recognized
example
within
training
includes
unrepresentative
datasets
that
limit
generalizability
real-world
populations
(3).
Whilst
may
outperform
current
standards
care
well-represented
groups,
models
perform
worse
under-represented
(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9).
Diversifying
is
obvious
solution
to
caused
by
homogenous
data,
however
data
collection
a
long
term
project
take
years
or
even
decades
acquire
(10).
dilemma
policymakers
currently
releasing
unfair
harm
whilst
withholding
them
would
cause
significant
welfare
opportunity
costs
groups.
To
address
this
problem,
bioethicists
like
Vandersluis
Savalescu
(11)
suggested
alternate
strategies
such
as
'selective
deployment',
which
deploy
only
This
incurs
an
fairness
cost.
issue
diagnostic
testing
not
specific
applications
debates
also
remain
ongoing
field
mainstream
medicine
how
challenge
(12,13).
By
examining
case
study
FIT
testing,
has
been
shown
more
effectively
male
patients
bowel
cancer
screening,
paper
supports
use
sex
adjustment
'level
up'
female
(14).
Through
medicine,
lessons
learned
from
policy
be
transferred
clinical
will
illustrated
using
parallel
AI-assisted
breast
screening.Bowel
screening:NHS
England
introduced
screening
detection
2019,
see
Figure
1
summary
workflow
(15).
tests
stool
samples
measure
concentration
blood
stool,
if
above
specified
threshold
triggers
referral
further
investigation
usually
colonoscopy.
In
UK,
National
Screening
Committee
(NSC)
set
(120µg/g)
based
cost-effectiveness
analysis,
where
effectiveness
determined
Quality-Adjusted
Life
Years
(QALY)
gained,
system
capacity
(16).
lower
results
'positive'
tests,
with
greater
rate
unnecessary
colonoscopies.
Conversely,
higher
thresholds
result
burden
colonoscopy
constraints
at
risk
missed
cancers.
There
increasing
evidence
FITs
patients,
who
median
faecal
measurement
than
males
(17).
For
each
threshold,
rates
found
subgroup
(18).
Despite
this,
UK
continues
universal
contrast
some
other
countries
adopted
sex-adjusted
resulting
positive
test
(19).
example,
Sweden's
positivity
40µg/g
80µg/g
females
respectively,
resulted
equal
proportions
subgroups
but
cost
colonoscopies
(20).
Similar
trends
seen
Finland
(21).A
cost-benefit
analysis
conducted.
aim
assess
'levelling-up'
through
ensuring
equitable
health
outcomes
when
'unfair'
being
utilised.
Following
way
levelling
up
applied
deployments,
assisted
mammogram
interpretation,
explored.
These
studies
illustrate
usefulness
transfer
learning
emerging
algorithmic
fairness.In
fairest
strategy
maximal
utility.
From
public
perspective,
increased
levels
similar
men
reduce
overall
mortality
morbidity
(22).
Economically,
reducing
false
earlier
effective
presentations
amenable
treatment
particularly
important
publicly
funded
(23).
turn,
service
reduced
first
line
treatments,
social
associated
advanced
cancer.
Health
gains
vary
between
due
differences
underlying
population
risk,
Sweden
shows
nearly
25%
classified
thresholds,
were
subsequently
diagnosed
ethical
standpoint,
acknowledges
processes
suboptimal
fair
outcomes,
much
base
grounded
white
normativity
(24).The
disadvantaged
centre
positives.
Firstly,
posed
positives
differ
depending
application,
completely
free
they
do
constitute
relatively
intervention.
randomised
trial
exploring
effect
approximately
12,000
had
colonoscopy,
there
no
perforations
deaths
30
days
post
procedure
(25).
Furthermore,
specialist
nurses
screen
all
before
ensure
fit
enough
safety
net
mitigate
(26).
Secondly,
healthcare
providers
able
provide
necessary
unit
space,
equipment
qualified
personnel
(27).
Some
argue
it
increase
keeping
same
could
lead
equivalent
performance
without
exceeding
existing
capacity.
Although
widely
accepted
down-levelling
group
unethical.
Instead,
must
mandate
prior
responsible
design
approach,
so
appropriate
both
considered.Levelling
presents
unique
challenges
medicine.
advocates
adjustments
poor
subgroups,
need
post-deployment
evaluation
complex
nature
disease
manifestation.
Data
drift
refers
changes
properties
over
time
what
was
used
(28).
AI,
phenomena
whereby
mean
longer
appropriate;
presenting
younger
declining
incidence
(29).
Therefore,
should
eternally
fixed
regular
conducted
continuing
purpose
meeting
ever-changing
needs
patients.Whilst
disadvantages
wellrepresented
non-white
racial
benefit
contexts.
Race-adjustment
difficult
adopt
sexadjustment
controversies
surrounding
race-based
stemming
historically
exploitative
practices
Sims'
experimentation
enslaved
black
women
(30).
race
construct
critical
historic
underpinnings
categories
continue
defined
(31).
However,
race-adjustment
useful
tool
addressing
inequality
instances
uplevel
receive
inadequate
failures,
part
systemic
racism,
rather
propagate
belief
innate
biological
differences.
When
poorly
performing
adjustment,
transparency
understanding
trust
providers,
faced
injustice.Though
differential
one-size-fits-all
solution.
Rather,
intended
add
research
deploying
models,
allowing
comprehensive
guide
draw
from.
conditions
under
most
suitable
approach.
mitigation
identifies
bias,
specifically
underdiagnosis.
teams
understand
sequalae
referral.
different
contexts
repercussions,
application
deployed
across
separate
NHS
trusts
varying
guidelines.
Adjustment
preferred
low-risk
intervention,
high
gain
screening.
Next,
workflows
human-in-the-loop
over-referral,
nurse
contact
fitness
testing.An
these
apply
Similarly
mammograms
offered
national
programme
NHS,
workflow.
imaging,
known
computer
vision,
popular
(32).
NSC
finding
lack
introduce
already
begun
trialing
second
reader
prospective
(33,34).
Recent
highlighted
commercially
available
diagnosing
suspicious
lesions
images
overpredicts
(35).
raised,
context
strategy.
An
intentional
initial
underdiagnosis
subgroup.
Levelling
given
possible
low
double
read
requirement
(36).
acts
one
readers
clinician-in-the-loop
query
diagnoses
seek
third
opinion
necessary.
fails
(i.e.
human
wrongly
classify
suspicious),
urgent
specialty
review
organised
decide
biopsy
lowering
patients.Levelling
doesn't
solve
reasons
why
differentially,
does
offer
happen
point
pipeline.
As
such,
cross
functional
including
developers,
researchers
attempt
elicit
act
together
highlight
interventions
counteract
preventable
root
causes.
initiatives
engage
efforts
techniques
synthetic
diversify
(37)(38)(39).In
summary,
approach
safely
balances
utility
certain
met.
highlights
solutions
diagnostics
base,
AI.
harm,
essential
remains
focus
bias.
Frontiers in Immunology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
16
Published: March 10, 2025
Phosphodiesterase
4
(PDE4)
is
an
enzyme
that
specifically
hydrolyzes
the
second
messenger
cAMP
and
has
a
critical
role
in
regulation
of
variety
cellular
functions.
In
recent
years,
PDE4
attracted
great
interest
cancer
research,
its
tumorigenesis
development
been
gradually
elucidated.
Research
indicates
abnormal
expression
or
heightened
activity
associated
with
initiation
progression
multiple
cancers,
including
lung,
colorectal,
hematological
by
facilitating
cell
proliferation,
migration,
invasion,
anti-apoptosis.
Moreover,
also
influences
tumor
immune
microenvironment,
significantly
evasion
suppressing
anti-tumor
responses,
reducing
T-cell
activation,
promoting
polarization
tumor-associated
macrophages
toward
pro-tumorigenic
phenotype.
However,
family
may
have
both
oncogenic
tumor-suppressive
effects,
which
could
depend
on
specific
type
grade
tumor.
inhibitors
garnered
substantial
as
potential
anti-cancer
therapeutics,
directly
inhibiting
growth
restoring
surveillance
capabilities
to
enhance
clearance
cells.
Several
are
currently
under
investigation
aim
exploring
their
therapy,
particularly
combination
strategies
checkpoint
inhibitors,
improve
therapeutic
efficacy
mitigate
side
effects
conventional
chemotherapy.
This
review
provides
overview
tumorigenesis,
drug
resistance,
immunotherapy,
actions
intending
guide
exploration
new
target
therapy.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
27, P. e53567 - e53567
Published: April 1, 2025
Background
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
has
the
potential
to
transform
cancer
diagnosis,
ultimately
leading
better
patient
outcomes.
Objective
We
performed
an
umbrella
review
summarize
and
critically
evaluate
evidence
for
AI-based
imaging
diagnosis
of
cancers.
Methods
PubMed,
Embase,
Web
Science,
Cochrane,
IEEE
databases
were
searched
relevant
systematic
reviews
from
inception
June
19,
2024.
Two
independent
investigators
abstracted
data
assessed
quality
evidence,
using
Joanna
Briggs
Institute
(JBI)
Critical
Appraisal
Checklist
Systematic
Reviews
Research
Syntheses.
further
in
each
meta-analysis
by
applying
Grading
Recommendations,
Assessment,
Development,
Evaluation
(GRADE)
criteria.
Diagnostic
performance
synthesized
narratively.
Results
In
a
comprehensive
analysis
158
included
studies
evaluating
AI
algorithms
noninvasive
across
8
major
human
system
cancers,
accuracy
classifiers
central
nervous
cancers
varied
widely
(ranging
48%
100%).
Similarities
observed
diagnostic
head
neck,
respiratory
system,
digestive
urinary
female-related
systems,
skin,
other
sites.
Most
meta-analyses
demonstrated
positive
summary
performance.
For
instance,
9
meta-analyzed
sensitivity
specificity
esophageal
cancer,
showing
ranges
90%-95%
80%-93.8%,
respectively.
case
breast
detection,
calculated
pooled
within
75.4%-92%
83%-90.6%,
Four
reported
ovarian
both
75%-94%.
Notably,
lung
was
relatively
low,
primarily
distributed
between
65%
80%.
Furthermore,
80.4%
(127/158)
high
according
JBI
Checklist,
with
remaining
classified
as
medium
quality.
The
GRADE
assessment
indicated
that
overall
moderate
low.
Conclusions
Although
shows
great
achieving
accelerated,
accurate,
more
objective
diagnoses
multiple
there
are
still
hurdles
overcome
before
its
implementation
clinical
settings.
present
findings
highlight
concerted
effort
research
community,
clinicians,
policymakers
is
required
existing
translate
this
into
improved
outcomes
health
care
delivery.
Trial
Registration
PROSPERO
CRD42022364278;
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022364278
Frontiers in Digital Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
7
Published: April 3, 2025
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
's
rapid
integration
into
healthcare
transforms
medical
decision-making,
preventive
strategies,
and
patient
engagement.
AI-driven
technologies,
including
real-time
health
monitoring
predictive
analytics,
offer
new
personalized
care
possibilities.
However,
concerns
regarding
ethical
implications,
data
security,
equitable
access
remain
unresolved.
This
paper
addresses
the
critical
gap
in
AI
healthcare,
highlighting
statistical
evidence
of
its
impact.
It
also
explores
intersection
AI,
medicine,
challenges
future
envisioning
evolving
roles
physicians
patients
an
AI-integrated
ecosystem.
A
fictional
case
study
projected
for
2040,
illustrating
entirely
digitized,
AI-supported
system,
frames
discussion
about
digital
privacy
regulations,
AI's
implications
medicine.
Digital
interventions
powered
by
will
facilitate
strengthen
autonomy,
enhance
precision
algorithmic
bias,
privacy,
equity
must
be
addressed
to
ensure
fosters
inclusivity
rather
than
exacerbating
disparities.
Regulatory
frameworks,
such
as
GDPR,
provide
foundational
protections,
but
further
adaptations
are
required
govern
expanding
role
digital-assisted
medicine
has
potential
redefine
patient-provider
interactions,
efficiency,
promote
proactive
management.
achieving
this
vision
requires
a
multidisciplinary
approach
involving
professionals,
policymakers,
technology
developers.
Future
research
should
focus
on
regulatory
literacy,
implementation
balance
innovation
with
equity,
ensuring
that
remains
patient-centered
inclusive.
Diagnostics,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(7), P. 939 - 939
Published: April 7, 2025
Background:
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
developed
for
skin
cancer
recognition
has
been
shown
to
have
comparable
or
superior
performance
dermatologists.
However,
it
is
uncertain
if
current
AI
models
trained
predominantly
with
lighter
Fitzpatrick
types
can
be
effectively
adapted
Asian
populations.
Objectives:
A
systematic
review
was
performed
summarize
the
existing
use
of
artificial
detection
in
Methods:
Systematic
search
conducted
on
PubMed
and
EMBASE
articles
published
regarding
amongst
Information
study
characteristics,
model
outcomes
collected.
Conclusions:
Current
studies
show
optimistic
results
utilizing
Asia.
comparison
image
abilities
might
not
a
true
representation
diagnostic
versus
dermatologists
real-world
setting.
To
ensure
appropriate
implementation,
maximize
potential
AI,
improve
transferability
across
various
genotypes
cancers,
crucial
focus
prospective,
real-world-based
practice,
as
well
expansion
diversification
databases
used
training
validation.