Knowledge co‐production praxis in sustainability science: Insights from three contexts DOI Creative Commons
Emma Ligtermoet

Geographical Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 11, 2024

Abstract Knowledge co‐production is needed as never before to support social change in the face of climate, water, biodiversity, and other sustainability crises. Co‐production brings together diverse groups their ways knowing generate new knowledges practices that reconfigure or transformative changes invite reflexivity. Within sciences, tensions exist between descriptive, analytical framings used interrogate knowledge‐power relations instrumental normative build such relations. The former has been criticised for being overly descriptive difficult translate into policy outcomes latter failing sufficiently power dynamics perpetuating existing inequities. As researchers, how are we navigate this tension? praxis involves reconfiguring just changes. I suggest what a critical lens on those underpin guide feasible action‐oriented processes In three ways, present reflect contexts with different temporal, spatial epistemological characteristics. These analysing historical knowledge coastal freshwater floodplain Country Northern Territory, facilitating Kunwinjku Seasons calendar enabling reflexive science researchers at national institution. demonstrate need within each context weave analytical, practical, work fairer societal pay greater attention socio‐institutional arising from our engaged work.

Language: Английский

IMAGINE sustainability: integrated inner-outer transformation in research, education and practice DOI Creative Commons
Christopher D. Ives, Niko Schäpke, C Woiwode

et al.

Sustainability Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 18(6), P. 2777 - 2786

Published: July 1, 2023

Abstract There has been a recent proliferation of research and practice on the interior dimensions sustainability, such as values, beliefs, worldviews inner capacities. This nascent field transformation is dynamic emerging, with varied terminology, breadth applications, intense debate about possible contributions well limitations shortcomings. In this article, we aim to provide some orientation by systematising core emerging domain via acronym IMAGINE. We show that ontologically, highlights (i) Interdependence inner/outer individual/collective/system phenomena, (ii) Multiple potential latent within each us enable transformative change. Correspondingly, it underscores implications phenomena for sustainability related action-taking, particularly through: (iii) Activation across individual, collective system levels, (iv) Generation capacities through intentional practices. Epistemologically, necessitates (v) INclusion diverse perspectives, required (vi) Expanding knowledge systems sustainability. The presented heuristic offers framework systematically support guide researchers, educators practitioners incorporate into their work, which key requirement outcomes necessary effectively formulate policy frameworks.

Language: Английский

Citations

37

Science and values: a two-way direction DOI Creative Commons
Emanuele Ratti, Federica Russo

European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(1)

Published: Feb. 5, 2024

Abstract In the science and values literature, scholars have shown how is influenced shaped by values, often in opposition to ‘value free’ ideal of science. this paper, we aim contribute literature showing that relation between flows not only from into scientific practice, but also (allegedly neutral) themselves. The extant ‘science values’ field focuses large on reconstructing, post hoc, science; our reconstruction case studies, instead, aims show concepts methods too, because specific identifiable characteristics, can promote some rather than (or at expense of) others. We explain bidirectional analogy debates normativity technical artifacts feminist approaches science, illustrate claims with cases health sciences machine learning. While arguments paper draw hoc reconstructions, intend where, making, should engage question whether a practice value-laden, conceptual methodological choices influence down road. All all, these considerations expand ways which philosophers more value-aware practices.

Language: Английский

Citations

11

Transformative research for sustainability: characteristics, tensions, and moving forward DOI Creative Commons
Andra‐Ioana Horcea‐Milcu, Ine Dorresteijn, Julia Leventon

et al.

Global Sustainability, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 7

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Abstract Technical summary The question of how science can become a lever in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals permeates most recent sustainability research. Wide-ranging literature calling for transformative approach has emerged years. This ‘transformative turn’ is fueled by publications from fields such as science, social-ecological research, conservation transitions, or governance studies. However, there lack shared understanding specifically what meant research to be this developing discourse around doing differently tackle problems. We aim advance sustainability. define and outline six its characteristics: (1) interventional nature theory change focus; (2) collaborative modes knowledge production, experimentation learning; (3) systems thinking literacy contextualization; (4) reflexivity, normative inner dimensions; (5) local agency, decolonization, reshaping power; (6) new quality criteria rethinking impact. highlight three tensions between traditional paradigms academic research: process- output-orientation; accountability toward society science; methodologies rooted scientific traditions post-normal methodologies. conclude with future directions on academia could reconcile these support promote Non-technical Dominant ways are not enough achieve UN Goals. typical response dealing current global crises produce accumulate more knowledge. Transformative seeks couple production co-creating change. paper defines way pro-actively society's fight against pressing societal environmental present characteristics reflect challenges related implementing practice play part. Social media Sustainability transformation needs reflected but makes transformative?

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Five social science intervention areas for ocean sustainability initiatives DOI Creative Commons
Stefan Partelow, Achim Schlüter, Natalie C. Ban

et al.

npj Ocean Sustainability, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 2(1)

Published: Dec. 9, 2023

Abstract Ocean sustainability initiatives – in research, policy, management and development will be more effective delivering comprehensive benefits when they proactively engage with, invest use social knowledge. We synthesize five intervention areas for engagement collaboration with marine scientists, doing so we appeal to all ocean science disciplines non-academics working industry, government, funding agencies civil society. The are: (1) Using ethics guide decision-making, (2) Improving governance, (3) Aligning human behavior goals values, (4) Addressing impacts on people, (5) Building transdisciplinary partnerships co-producing transformation pathways. These focal can the four phases of most (Intention, Design, Implementation, Evaluation) improve avoid harm. Early integration knowledge from during intention setting design offers deepest potential benefits. Later stage collaborations leverage opportunities existing projects reflect learn while improving impact assessments, transparency reporting future activities.

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Principles for transformative ocean governance DOI Creative Commons
Amanda T. Lombard, Jai Kumar Clifford-Holmes, Victoria Goodall

et al.

Nature Sustainability, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 6(12), P. 1587 - 1599

Published: Sept. 7, 2023

Abstract With a focus on oceans, we collaborated across ecological, social and legal disciplines to respond the United Nations call for transformation in ‘2030 Agenda Sustainable Development’. We developed set of 13 principles that strategically critically connect transformative ocean research governance (complementing UN Decade Ocean Science). used rigorous, iterative transparent consensus-building approach define principles, which can interact supporting, neutral or sometimes conflicting ways. recommend could be applied as comprehensive discuss how learn from their interactions, particularly those reveal hidden tensions. The bring keep together partnerships innovative action. This action must many calls reform current ocean-use practices are based economic growth models have perpetuated inequities fuelled conflict environmental decline.

Language: Английский

Citations

16

Digital twins of the Earth with and for humans DOI Creative Commons
Wilco Hazeleger, Jerom Aerts, Péter Bauer

et al.

Communications Earth & Environment, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5(1)

Published: Aug. 27, 2024

Digital twins of the Earth are digital representations system, spanning scales and domains. Their purpose is to monitor, forecast assess system consequences human interventions on system. Providing users with capability interact interrogate decision support systems for addressing environmental challenges. By informing humans their impact aspire promote new pathways moving forward. answering causal queries through intervention analysis, they can enhance evidence-based policy making. Existing primarily technological information that represent physical world. However, as social worlds intrinsically interconnected, we argue must be accounted both within outside Earth: Within impacts responses integral system; govern access development guide responsible use acquired from twins. Incorporating interactions in represents a transformative frontier, promising unparalleled insights into dynamics empower action. Humans represented Earth, but also play role usage, argues perspective based interdisciplinary scientific expert viewpoints.

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Neither right nor wrong? Ethics of collaboration in transformative research for sustainable futures DOI Creative Commons
Julia M. Wittmayer, Ying-Syuan Huang,

Kristina Bogner

et al.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: May 25, 2024

Abstract Transformative research is a broad and loosely connected family of disciplines approaches, with the explicit normative ambition to fundamentally question status quo, change dominant structures, support just sustainability transitions by working collaboratively society. When engaging in such science-practice collaborations for transformative society, researchers experience ethical dilemmas. Amongst others, they must decide, what worthwhile be researched, whose reality privileged, knowledge included. Yet, current institutionalised standards, which largely follow tradition medical ethics, are insufficient guide navigating In addressing this vacuum, community has started develop peer guidance on constitutes morally good behaviour. These formal informal guidelines offer repertoire explain justify positions decisions. However, only helpful when have become part researchers’ practical ‘in situ’. By focusing situated practices, article addresses need an attitude leaning into uncertainty around behaviour constitutes. It also highlights significance combining critical reflexive practice both individually answering questions ‘how to’ as well ‘what right thing do’. Using collaborative autoethnographic approach, authors paper share their own dilemmas doing research, discuss those, relate them heuristic encompassing axiological, ontological, epistemological considerations. The aim building wisdom broader about how navigate arising practice.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Lost in a haze or playing to partners’ strengths? Learning to collaborate in three transdisciplinary European Living Labs DOI Creative Commons
Marina Knickel, Guido Caniglia, Karlheinz Knickel

et al.

Futures, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 152, P. 103219 - 103219

Published: July 12, 2023

The ability to learn from each other plays a central role in successful transdisciplinary (TD) collaboration. This article systematically investigates how learning collaborate allows researchers and practitioners navigate the challenges of collaborative TD work. Drawing on social theory, we emphasise processual nature research as collaborate. We examine processes three Living Labs located different socio-cultural institutional contexts Europe. explored conditions for mutually beneficial rural-urban relations. use data systematic monitoring 4-year Horizon 2020 project. Our analysis illustrates through collaboration can enhance individual collective capacities deal with perspectives, priorities, approaches, enabling achievement transformative objectives. also show particular factors lead differing histories lack attention may result provides more encompassing understanding complex dynamics underpinning research. argue that an intentional focus is essential fulfil aspiration contribute creating knowledge co-production sustainable futures.

Language: Английский

Citations

11

Reflexive use of methods: a framework for navigating different types of knowledge and power in transformative research DOI Creative Commons
Minna Kaljonen, Johanna Jacobi, Kaisa Korhonen‐Kurki

et al.

Sustainability Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 19(2), P. 507 - 521

Published: Dec. 20, 2023

Abstract In transformative sustainability science, reflexivity is considered critical for ethically sound and socially relevant research. practice, many transdisciplinary knowledge co-production processes have faced problems in mitigating power hierarchies among the participating actors different types of knowledge. this paper, we develop test a reflexive framework that enables researchers to convey more explicitly how their methodological choices play role im/balancing relations co-production. The allows distinguish co-produced by methods, as well tracking movements between them. We utilize reflect upon made through application three namely Transition Arena, Theory Change, Participatory Food Sustainability Assessment Transformation Framework contexts. results illuminate agility navigating tensions imbalances, producing Moreover, call further attention science.

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Can We Reinvent the Modern University? A Vision for a Complementary Academic System, with a Life-Affirming and Spiritually Conscious Orientation DOI Creative Commons

Filippo Dal Fiore

Challenges, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16(1), P. 6 - 6

Published: Jan. 16, 2025

The current global academic system, rooted in a reductionist, materialist and westernized worldview, reflects the modern industrial era which it took shape is therefore ill-equipped to address complex challenges of today’s polycrisis. This viewpoint offers vision for complementary system aimed at filling this gap, one grounded on an expanded notion what science higher education can be how best they serve world. It part independent research book project broad topic Reimagining Academia, developed dialogue with pioneering spiritually oriented scientific professional networks. Moving from recognition principal limits universities, paper describes alternative home all those scholars, students, practitioners social constituencies whose worldviews knowledge systems are shifting towards more holistic approaches. Grounded new ontological framework human-centered modus operandi, proposed would aim revive disciplines inside out, by means life-affirming assumptions purposes. concludes outlining practical steps realization vision, proposing alliance scientific, cultural, actors.

Language: Английский

Citations

0