Solar Energy, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 159, P. 97 - 112
Published: Nov. 3, 2017
Language: Английский
Solar Energy, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 159, P. 97 - 112
Published: Nov. 3, 2017
Language: Английский
Solar Energy, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 136, P. 78 - 111
Published: July 8, 2016
Language: Английский
Citations
1048Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 81, P. 912 - 928
Published: Sept. 1, 2017
Language: Английский
Citations
946Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 124, P. 109792 - 109792
Published: March 2, 2020
Language: Английский
Citations
849Energy Conversion and Management, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 156, P. 459 - 497
Published: Dec. 1, 2017
Language: Английский
Citations
794Solar Energy, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 136, P. 125 - 144
Published: July 8, 2016
Language: Английский
Citations
473Energy, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 224, P. 120109 - 120109
Published: Feb. 19, 2021
Language: Английский
Citations
383IET Renewable Power Generation, Journal Year: 2015, Volume and Issue: 9(8), P. 1043 - 1063
Published: July 27, 2015
Recent researches oriented to photovoltaic (PV) systems feature booming interest in current decade. For efficiency improvement, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of PV array output is mandatory. Although classical MPPT techniques offer simplified structure and implementation, their performance degraded when compared with artificial intelligence‐based especially during partial shading rapidly changing environmental conditions. Artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms several capabilities such as: (i) off‐line training, (ii) nonlinear mapping, (iii) high‐speed response, (iv) robust operation, (v) less computational effort (vi) compact solution for multiple‐variable problems. Hence, ANN have been widely applied as techniques. Among various available ANN‐based techniques, very limited references gather those a survey. Neither classification nor comparisons between competitors exist. Moreover, no detailed analysis the system under has previously discussed. This study presents survey based The authors propose new categorisation on controller input variables. In addition, comparison from points view, structure, experimental verification transient/steady‐state presented. are taken into consideration update purpose.
Language: Английский
Citations
288Applied Sciences, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 10(2), P. 487 - 487
Published: Jan. 9, 2020
Forecasting is a crucial task for successfully integrating photovoltaic (PV) output power into the grid. The design of accurate forecasters remains challenging issue, particularly multistep-ahead prediction. Accurate PV forecasting critical in number applications, such as micro-grids (MGs), energy optimization and management, integrated smart buildings, electrical vehicle chartering. Over last decade, vast literature has been produced on this topic, investigating numerical probabilistic methods, physical models, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. This paper aims at providing complete review recent applications AI techniques; we will focus machine learning (ML), deep (DL), hybrid these branches are becoming increasingly attractive. Special attention be paid to development application DL, well future trends topic.
Language: Английский
Citations
249IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 8(1), P. 13 - 22
Published: June 7, 2016
Distribution voltage profiles are subjected to overvoltage limit violations from high penetration of grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems. Such rises seen at the point PV interconnection can be mitigated by adaptively changing active and/or reactive power injection inverter. This work proposes a local regulation technique that utilizes very short-term (15 s) forecasts circumvent imminent upper violation or an scenario. To provide these generation forecasts, hybrid forecasting method is formulated based on Kalman filter theory, which applies physical modeling using high-resolution data on-site measurements. The proposed algorithm employs curtailment when estimate given droop-based cannot desired within predefined factor limits. threshold values calculated in such way this reduce possible violations. effectiveness demonstrated with case studies developed standard test feeder realistic load and profiles.
Language: Английский
Citations
244Energies, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 12(9), P. 1621 - 1621
Published: April 29, 2019
We compare the 24-hour ahead forecasting performance of two methods commonly used for prediction power output photovoltaic systems. Both are based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), which have been trained same dataset, thus enabling a much-needed homogeneous comparison currently lacking in available literature. The dataset consists an hourly series simultaneous climatic and PV system parameters covering entire year, has clustered to distinguish sunny from cloudy days separately train ANN. One method feeds only while other is hybrid as it relies upon daily weather forecast. For days, first shows very good stable performance, with almost constant Normalized Mean Absolute Error, NMAE%, all cases (1% < NMAE% 2%); even better (NMAE% 1%) considered this analysis, but overall less > 2% up 5.3% cases). both typically drops; rather that does not use forecasts, varies significantly analysis.
Language: Английский
Citations
239