Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: Nov. 26, 2022
Water
distribution
systems
(WDSs)
need
to
be
resilient
against
seismic
hazards
ensure
rapid
recovery
of
the
community
following
an
earthquake.
Topology-based
resilience
metrics
are
often
used
determine
system-level
performance
WDSs.
However,
existing
topology-based
unable
estimate
WDSs
accurately
because
they
do
not
account
for
vulnerability
pipelines
in
metrics.
This
study
tailored
topological
metric
and
developed
a
new
edge-betweenness-based
evaluating
complex
water
network.
System-level
is
compared
using
four
measures
including
minimum
cut
set
(MCS)–based
system
reliability,
(TRM),
modified
TRM,
newly
TRM.
These
were
applied
(i.e.,
Anytown,
New
York
Tunnel,
Jilin,
Bellingham
WDSs)
with
unique
characteristics
validate
their
effectiveness
estimating
hazards.
The
outcomes
these
applications
show
that
proposed
TRM
can
pipelines’
functionality
after
earthquake
acceptable
accuracy
approaches.
While
analysis
provides
information
about
functionality,
it
also
vital
optimal
sequence
damaged
maximize
during
process.
Therefore,
easy-to-use
strategy
based
on
repair
index.
was
tested
procedure
Anytown
WDS
due
earthquake,
restored
quickest
strategy.
Water,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
10(2), P. 164 - 164
Published: Feb. 7, 2018
Over
the
past
few
decades,
concept
of
resilience
has
emerged
as
an
important
consideration
in
planning
and
management
water
infrastructure
systems.
Accordingly,
various
measures
have
been
developed
for
quantitative
evaluation
decision-making
There
are,
however,
numerous
considerations
no
clear
choice
which
measure,
if
any,
provides
most
appropriate
representation
a
given
application.
This
study
critical
review
approaches
to
measure
systems,
with
focus
on
resources
distribution
A
compilation
11
criteria
evaluating
21
selected
addressing
major
features
is
using
Axiomatic
Design
process.
Existing
gaps
are
identified
based
criteria.
The
results
show
that
generally
paid
less
attention
cascading
damage
interrelated
rapid
identification
failure,
physical
system
components,
time
variation
resilience.
Concluding
paper,
improvements
recommended.
findings
contribute
our
understanding
provide
information
help
further
improve
Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
1(1), P. 74 - 87
Published: March 1, 2021
Pipelines
are
the
most
vital
energy-transportation
mediums
of
today's
energy-intensive
economies.
To
a
level,
pipeline
integrity
is
tied
to
continuous
development
and
robustness
modern
societies,
where
major
failures
may
result
in
dire
environmental,
societal,
economic
consequences.
Therefore,
safety
crucial
for
sustainable
future
responsible
development.
Pipeline
management
has
been
topic
interest
regulators,
practitioners,
academicians
alike.
Over
past
four
decades,
evolved
from
prescriptive
visual
inspection
assessment
risk-based
using
real-time
data.
This
paper
aims
capture
evolution
methods
management,
focusing
on
last
two
decades.
The
answers
primary
questions:
What
how
it
evolved?
How
does
concept
risk
fit
management?
used
assess
manage
integrity?
will
accommodate
Industry
4.0?
Infrastructures,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
7(5), P. 67 - 67
Published: May 2, 2022
Critical
infrastructures
such
as
transportation,
power,
telecommunication,
water
supply,
and
hospitals
play
a
vital
role
in
effectively
managing
post-disaster
responses.
The
resilience
of
critical
should
be
incorporated
the
planning
designing
phase
based
on
risk
assessment
particular
geographic
area.
However,
framework
to
assess
infrastructure
(CIR)
is
variably
conceptualised.
Therefore,
objective
this
study
was
critically
appraise
existing
CIR
frameworks
developed
since
adoption
Sendai
Framework
2015
with
hazard
focus
earthquakes.
preferred
reporting
items
for
systematic
reviews
meta-analyses
(PRISMA)
method
used
selection
24
most
relevant
studies,
these
were
analysed
delineate
frameworks,
models,
concepts.
found
that
there
are
wide-ranging
disparities
among
resilience,
it
has
become
key
challenge
prioritise
resilience-based
investment
sector.
Furthermore,
attributes
performance
indicators,
emergency
aspects,
damage
need
considered
different
disaster
phases—ex-ante,
during,
ex-post—to
improve
long-term
infrastructure.
Subsequently,
an
integrated
adaptable
proposed
proper
decision
making.
Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
9(5), P. 473 - 495
Published: March 14, 2024
Local
site
characterization
and
regional
tectonic
environment
are
crucial
when
designing
earthquake-resistant
bridges.
Insufficient
understanding
of
these
factors
can
lead
to
significant
seismic
damages
low
resilience
bridge
components.
In
this
study,
the
loss
bridges
located
in
soft
soil
examined
based
on
proposed
fragility
functions
at
both
individual
element
system
levels.
The
effects
aging
construction
quality
also
taken
into
account
evaluate
performance
findings
study
revealed
that
class
D
most
vulnerable
all
structural
integrity
scenarios.
Bridges
with
inadequate
design
may
not
have
necessary
flexibility
absorb
dissipate
energy.
contribute
evaluating
transportation
network
functionality
decision-making
procedures
within
a
designated
framework
for
disaggregation
any
earthquake
scenario
Journal of Infrastructure Systems,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
24(3)
Published: June 9, 2018
Water
distribution
systems
(WDS)
are
among
the
most
critical
civil
infrastructure
systems.
A
reliable
and
safe
water
supply
is
essential
for
prosperity
continued
well-being
of
society.
Hence,
adequate
maintenance,
repair,
renewal
vast
physical
assets
in
WDS
paramount
importance,
especially
places
with
widespread
deterioration
assets.
However,
due
to
limited
resources,
utilities
struggle
their
asset
management
strategies
keep
pace
aging
components.
Recently,
have
made
efforts
refine
traditional
condition-based
approach
pipeline
that
focuses
on
maintaining
current
condition
into
a
service-based
which
system
performance
explicitly
considered.
This
paper
reviews
existing
literature
various
aspects
WDS,
focusing
specifically
buried
pipelines.
Existing
assessment
(CA)
techniques,
failure
prediction
models,
time-dependent
vulnerability
maintenance
planning
strategies,
techniques
reviewed.
Various
modeling
performance,
as
well
its
interdependence
other
systems,
also
As
such,
presents
broad
overview
constitute
strategy
WDS.
The
advantages
limitations
different
methods
approaches
compared
assist
selection
an
appropriate
tool.
An
future
research
needs
related
presented.
Water,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
11(6), P. 1189 - 1189
Published: June 7, 2019
Water
distribution
networks
(WDNs)
are
critical
contributors
to
the
social
welfare,
economic
growth,
and
public
health
in
cities.
Under
uncertainties
that
introduced
owing
climate
change,
urban
development,
aging
components,
interdependent
infrastructure,
WDN
performance
must
be
evaluated
using
continuously
innovative
methods
data
acquisition.
Quantitative
resilience
assessments
provide
useful
information
for
operators
planners,
enabling
support
systems
can
withstand
disasters,
recover
quickly
from
outages,
adapt
uncertain
environments.
This
study
reviews
contemporary
approaches
quantifying
of
WDNs.
1508
journal
articles
published
1950
2018
identified
under
systematic
review
guidelines.
137
references
focus
on
quantitative
classified
as
surrogate
measures,
simulation
methods,
network
theory
approaches,
fault
detection
isolation
approaches.
identifies
capability
WDNs
describes
related
terms
absorptive,
restorative,
adaptive
capabilities.
It
also
discusses
metrics,
research
progresses,
limitations
associated
with
each
method.
Finally,
this
indicates
challenges
quantification
should
overcome
achieving
improved
future.
