Investigación en Educación Médica,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13(49), P. 5 - 8
Published: Jan. 7, 2024
Con
la
inteligencia
artificial,
estamos
invocando
al
demonio".Elon
Musk
"Mitigar
el
riesgo
de
extinción
debido
a
IA
debería
ser
una
prioridad
global
junto
con
otros
riesgos
escala
social,
como
las
pandemias
y
guerra
nuclear".Center
for
AI
Safety
1
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: Feb. 26, 2024
Abstract
The
present
discussion
examines
the
transformative
impact
of
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
in
educational
settings,
focusing
on
necessity
for
AI
literacy,
prompt
engineering
proficiency,
and
enhanced
critical
thinking
skills.
introduction
into
education
marks
a
significant
departure
from
conventional
teaching
methods,
offering
personalized
learning
support
diverse
requirements,
including
students
with
special
needs.
However,
this
integration
presents
challenges,
need
comprehensive
educator
training
curriculum
adaptation
to
align
societal
structures.
literacy
is
identified
as
crucial,
encompassing
an
understanding
technologies
their
broader
impacts.
Prompt
highlighted
key
skill
eliciting
specific
responses
systems,
thereby
enriching
experiences
promoting
thinking.
There
detailed
analysis
strategies
embedding
these
skills
within
curricula
pedagogical
practices.
This
discussed
through
case-study
based
Swiss
university
narrative
literature
review,
followed
by
practical
suggestions
how
implement
classroom.
Technology in Society,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
77, P. 102521 - 102521
Published: March 25, 2024
Drawing
on
the
Theory
of
Planned
Behaviour
(TPB),
this
study
investigates
relationship
between
perceived
benefits,
strengths,
weaknesses,
and
risks
generative
AI
(GenAI)
tools
fundamental
factors
TPB
model
(i.e.,
attitude,
subjective
norms,
behavioural
control).
The
also
structural
association
variables
intention
to
use
GenAI
tools,
how
latter
might
affect
actual
usage
in
higher
education.
paper
adopts
a
quantitative
approach,
relying
an
anonymous
self-administered
online
questionnaire
gather
primary
data
from
130
lecturers
168
students
education
institutions
(HEIs)
several
countries,
PLS-SEM
for
analysis.
results
indicate
that
although
lecturers'
students'
perceptions
weaknesses
differ,
strengths
advantages
technologies
have
significant
positive
impact
their
attitudes,
control.
core
positively
significantly
intentions
which
turn
adoption
such
tools.
This
advances
theory
by
outlining
shaping
HEIs.
It
provides
stakeholders
with
variety
managerial
policy
implications
formulate
suitable
rules
regulations
utilise
these
while
mitigating
impacts
disadvantages.
Limitations
future
research
opportunities
are
outlined.
Studies in Higher Education,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
49(5), P. 883 - 897
Published: March 13, 2024
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
may
be
the
new-new-norm
in
a
post-pandemic
learning
environment.
There
is
growing
number
of
university
students
using
AI
like
ChatGPT
and
Bard
to
support
their
academic
experience.
Much
higher
education
research
date
has
focused
on
integrity
matters
authorship;
yet,
there
unintended
consequences
beyond
these
concerns
for
students.
That
is,
people
who
reduce
formal
social
interactions
while
tools.
This
study
evaluates
387
relationship
–
with
artificial
large-language
model-based
Using
structural
equation
modelling,
finds
evidence
that
chatbots
designed
information
provision
associated
student
performance,
when
support,
psychological
wellbeing,
loneliness,
sense
belonging
are
considered
it
net
negative
effect
achievement.
tests
an
AI-specific
form
cost
pose
success,
retention.
Indeed,
chatbot
usage
poorer
outcomes,
human-substitution
activity
occurring
chooses
seek
from
rather
than
human
(e.g.
librarian,
professor,
or
advisor)
interesting
teaching
policy
implications.
We
explore
implications
this
lens
success
belonging.
Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(14), P. 6118 - 6118
Published: July 17, 2024
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
advances
and
the
rapid
adoption
of
generative
AI
tools,
like
ChatGPT,
present
new
opportunities
challenges
for
higher
education.
While
substantial
literature
discusses
in
education,
there
is
a
lack
systems
approach
that
captures
holistic
view
structure
dynamics
transformation
education
institutions
(HEIs).
To
fill
this
gap,
article
develops
causal
loop
diagram
(CLD)
to
map
feedback
mechanisms
typical
HEI.
We
identify
important
variables
their
relationships
multiple
reinforcing
balancing
loops
accounting
forces
drive
its
impact
on
value
creation
The
model
shows
how,
motivated
by
technology
advances,
HEI
can
invest
improve
student
learning,
research,
administration
while
dealing
with
academic
integrity
problems
adapting
job
market
changes
emphasizing
AI-complementary
skills.
explore
insights,
scenarios,
policy
interventions
recommend
leaders
become
thinkers
manage
complexity
benefit
from
avoiding
traps
may
lead
decline.
also
discuss
notion
HEIs
influencing
direction
directions
future
research
sustainability
HEIs.
Behavioral Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(2), P. 165 - 165
Published: Feb. 2, 2025
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
technologies
have
profoundly
influenced
both
professional
environments
and
personal
lives.
In
the
rapidly
developing
sector
of
AI
education,
fostering
essential
literacy
among
university
students
has
become
vital.
Nevertheless,
factors
that
determine
remain
insufficiently
defined.
This
research,
grounded
in
self-determination
theory
(SDT),
seeks
to
investigate
relationships
three
components:
fulfillment
students’
psychological
needs,
self-regulated
learning
strategies
(SRLSs),
literacy.
The
aim
is
enhance
human
capital
efficiency
prepare
tackle
future
workplace
challenges
effectively.
To
examine
these
connections,
a
cross-sectional
survey
was
administered
1056
students.
findings
reveal
satisfying
needs—perceived
autonomy,
competence,
relatedness—plays
pivotal
role
advancing
Additionally,
four
SRLSs—cognitive
engagement,
metacognitive
knowledge,
resource
management,
motivational
beliefs—acted
as
mediators
between
needs
Consequently,
this
study
not
only
enhances
our
understanding
behavioral
development
during
their
engagement
with
education
but
also
provides
theoretical
support
practical
guidance
for
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: Aug. 6, 2024
Abstract
This
article
addresses
the
ethical
challenges
posed
by
generative
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
tools
in
higher
education
and
explores
first
responses
of
universities
to
these
globally.
Drawing
on
five
key
international
documents
from
UN,
EU,
OECD,
study
used
content
analysis
identify
dimensions
related
use
AI
academia,
such
as
accountability,
human
oversight,
transparency,
or
inclusiveness.
Empirical
evidence
was
compiled
30
leading
ranked
among
top
500
Shanghai
Ranking
list
May
July
2023,
covering
those
institutions
that
already
had
publicly
available
form
policy
guidelines.
The
paper
identifies
central
imperative
student
assignments
must
reflect
individual
knowledge
acquired
during
their
education,
with
individuals
retaining
moral
legal
responsibility
for
AI-related
wrongdoings.
top-down
requirement
aligns
a
bottom-up
approach,
allowing
instructors
flexibility
determining
how
they
utilize
especially
large
language
models
own
courses.
Regarding
typical
response
identified
involves
blend
preventive
measures
(e.g.,
course
assessment
modifications)
soft,
dialogue-based
sanctioning
procedures.
challenge
transparency
induced
good
practice
clear
communication
syllabi
university
examined
this
study.
Trends in Higher Education,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
4(1), P. 2 - 2
Published: Jan. 8, 2025
This
collective
systematic
literature
review
is
part
of
an
Erasmus+
project,
“TaLAI:
Teaching
and
Learning
with
AI
in
Higher
Education”.
The
investigates
the
current
state
Generative
Artificial
Intelligence
(GenAI)
higher
education,
aiming
to
inform
curriculum
design
further
developments
within
digital
education.
Employing
a
descriptive,
textual
narrative
synthesis
approach,
study
analysed
across
four
thematic
areas:
learning
objectives,
teaching
activities,
development,
institutional
support
for
ethical
responsible
GenAI
use.
93
peer-reviewed
articles
from
eight
databases
using
keyword-based
search
strategy,
collaborative
coding
process
involving
multiple
researchers,
vivo
transparent
documentation.
findings
provide
overview
recommendations
integrating
into
learning,
contributing
development
effective
AI-enhanced
environments
reveals
consensus
on
importance
incorporating
Common
themes
like
mentorship,
personalised
creativity,
emotional
intelligence,
higher-order
thinking
highlight
persistent
need
align
human-centred
educational
practices
capabilities
technologies.
Journal of Asian Public Policy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 23
Published: Aug. 27, 2024
The
burgeoning
field
of
Generative
Artificial
Intelligence
(GenAI)
presents
a
new
avenue
for
enhancing
teaching
and
learning
practices
within
higher
education.
While
existing
research
has
predominantly
focused
on
GenAI's
capabilities
to
perform
specific
educational
tasks,
its
potential
as
an
interactive
agent
engaging
in
human-like
conversations
forming
connections
remains
underexplored.
Drawing
upon
connectivist
lens
that
recognizes
occurs
networks
interactions,
we
investigate
how
GenAI
tools
can
contribute
social
entrepreneurship
Through
qualitative
interviews
with
multiple
key
stakeholder
groups,
this
study
reveals
three
dimensions
dialogic
spaces
be
enabled
by
GenAI:
collaborative
learning,
knowledge
connectivity,
theory-practice
integration.
This
makes
several
contributions.
First,
it
expands
current
discussions
AI
education,
moving
beyond
tool-based
acceptance
actively
exploring
active
agent.
Second,
contributes
the
literature
demonstrating
not
only
interaction
facilitators
but
also
agents
create
interactions
across
different
levels.
Finally,
offers
practical
insights
bridging
voices
perspectives
stakeholders
envision
future
where
coexists
traditional
agents.