The Existence of Stealth Corrections in Scientific Literature—A Threat to Scientific Integrity
Learned Publishing,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
38(2)
Published: Feb. 19, 2025
One
of
the
cornerstones
publication
integrity
is
thorough
maintenance
scientific
record
to
ensure
trustworthiness
its
content.
This
includes
strict
and
transparent
record-keeping
when
implementing
post-publication
changes
through
a
clearly
visible
corrigendum
or
erratum,
which
provides
details
reasons
for
them
(ICMJE
2024).
However,
such
not
always
practised
as
stealth
changes,
literature
without
any
accompanying
note,
have
been
observed.
notable
kind
change
retraction:
published
papers
simply
disappearing
from
website
journal
formal
retraction
notice
(Teixeira
da
Silva
2016;
Teixeira
Daly
Besides
retractions,
second
problematic
type
exists
in
literature:
corrections.
We
define
correction
at
least
one
made
article,
providing
note
other
indicator
that
was
temporarily
permanently
altered.
Stealth
corrections
occasionally
described
by
online
blogs
(Bimler
2021;
Schneider
2020),
but
itself
has
yet
address
numerous
own
corpus.
In
this
we
provide
examples
found
total
131
articles
were
affected
corrections,
across
variety
large
small
publishers
(Table
1).
most
cases,
content
changed
2).
An
overview
all
(#
1-131)
can
be
Table
S1,
also
contains
links
PubPeer
posts
additional
detail.
Five
with
eventually
received
an
official
17
reverted
their
original
version
S1).
Nine
expressions
concern
published,
11
retracted
Additionally,
seven
book
chapters
removed
The
presented
paper
demonstrate
fundamental
mostly
ignored
problem
literature.
Correct
documentation
transparency
are
utmost
importance
uphold
science.
Post-publication
need
clear
readers
understand
if,
why,
made.
little
attention
paid
alterations.
For
example,
Committee
on
Publication
Ethics
(COPE)
flowcharts
indicating
needed
case
of:
plagiarism
20)
(COPE
2021b),
author
removal
2-9)
2021a)
inappropriate
image
manipulation
article
10-11,
18-19,
21-101)
no
specific
exist
affiliations
1–2),
consent
ethics
statements
129-130),
handling
editor
102-103),
allocation
issue
104-128).
amendments
silently,
will
give
rise
questions
regarding
journal,
editors
publisher,
might
undermine
validity
whole.
It
particularly
concerning
publications
serious
problems
duplication
data
receive
cases
issues,
could
mask
retraction,
potentially
benefit
journals,
authors
engaging
misconduct.
Future
likely
unaware
ever
present,
lead
less
critical
assessment
these
publications.
Readers
our
findings
even
get
impression
actively
trying
hide
problems,
where
journal's
Editor-in-chief
listed
stealthily
corrected
19,
7
months
after
discovered).
Or
publisher
moved
authored
special
"section",
different
part
MDPI
infrastructure
linked
issue,
possibly
order
meet
criteria
Directory
Open
Access
Journals
(DOAJ)
question
then
becomes
how
incentivise
transparency;
encourage
journals
notices
instead
resorting
corrections?
definitions
term
"correction."
Situations
become
complex
very
quickly
often
post
preliminary
pre-publication
versions
while
they
undergoing
setting
pre-prints
hosting
platform.
What
precise
moment
cases?
If
anything
during
stages,
count
Should
undocumented,
replacing
images
results
phase
publishing
process
still
regarded
not?
Another
complicating
factor
use
internal
guidelines
These
leave
room
interpretation
reader,
Elsevier:
"If
[…]
new
material
should
replace
accepted
may
consider
erratum
corrigendum"
(Elsevier
Guidelines
lack
information
make
decision
topic,
MDPI's
guidelines,
do
describe
what
removing
(MDPI
abovementioned
COPE
help
circumvent
offer
publisher-independent
guidance
adequately
types
add
another
threat
publishing,
besides
previously
phenomena
mills
(Bishop
Abalkina
2023;
Candal-Pedreira
et
al.
2022;
Else
Van
Noorden
2021),
fake
peer
review
(Oviedo-García
2024)
abuse
issues
(Mills,
Mertkan,
Onurkan
Aliusta
Authors
heart
fuelled
harsh
publish-or-perish
pressure
academia
(Al-Adawi,
Ali,
Al-Zakwani
Vasconez-Gonzalez
adequate
exclusively
responsibility
publishers,
editorial
boards.
Academic
seen
safeguards
(Desai
Shortell
2011;
Marusic
2010),
come
into
question.
strongly
recommend
every
change,
version,
publicly
logged
interest
transparency.
long
term,
ideally
automatic
process,
built
management
systems,
Editorial
Manager;
time
updated,
would
recorded
article's
public-facing
metadata.
fully
approach
allow
determinations
whether
consequential
not,
rather
than
relying
editors'
discretion.
Automating
logging
impossible,
giving
assurance
transparently
declared.
enable
indexing
services,
Web
Science
PubMed,
track
incorporate
evaluation
processes.
short
services
document
identified
sanctions
question,
index
repeat
offenders.
extremely
difficult
detect
ask
community
stay
vigilant
report
them.
Reporting
preferably
take
place
public
platform
necessary
long-term
documentation.
monitor
created
spreadsheet
listing
(find
it
here).
invite
interested
forward
link
detailing
us,
so
spreadsheet.
R.A.:
conceptualization,
curation,
analysis,
investigation,
methodology,
supervision,
validation,
writing
–
draft,
editing.
F.S.:
N.W.:
A.G.:
G.C.:
thank
Dorothy
Bishop,
Jana
Christopher
David
Bimler
proofreading
manuscript
valuable
feedback.
(anonymous)
science
sleuths
who
reported
corrections:
your
work
much
appreciated.
Nick
Wise
research
manager
Taylor
&
Francis.
final
submitted
before
he
started
working
supports
study
available
Supporting
Information
article.
S1.
collected
grouped
per
correction.
aLast
assessed:
December
2,
2024.
Please
note:
responsible
functionality
supporting
supplied
authors.
Any
queries
(other
missing
content)
directed
corresponding
Language: Английский
Scientific Productivity and Retracted Literature of Authors with Kazakhstani Affiliations During 2013–2023
Journal of Academic Ethics,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
What’s so special about special issues: Highlighting a central role of parasitology to support specific innovations and advance progress within our discipline
Parasitology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 5
Published: April 14, 2025
Language: Английский
The issue with special issues
Alison Abritis,
No information about this author
Adam I. Marcus,
No information about this author
Ivan Oransky
No information about this author
et al.
Accountability in Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 2
Published: Sept. 27, 2024
Language: Английский
On the (ab)use of special issues in scholarly journals
Accountability in Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 2
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
Language: Английский
Fractures in the academic publishing business model: a stakeholder perspective
Science and Public Policy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 13, 2024
Abstract
The
recent
listing
of
Springer-Nature
on
the
Frankfurt
stock
exchange
triggers
debate
for
more
fairness
and
equity
in
academic
publishing
business
model.
Language: Английский