Reply to commentaries – the separation distress hypothesis of depression – an update and systematic review DOI Creative Commons

Douglas F. Watt

Neuropsychoanalysis, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 26(1), P. 5 - 31

Published: Jan. 2, 2024

A number of very important challenges to the separation distress hypothesis depression were discussed, clarified, and linked various strands existing literature. Foremost among those is critical challenge define a more comprehensive set clinical precipitants, possibility that may have two prototype elicitors – social defeat loss, with hugely overlapping neurobiology, currently inadequate differentiation in terms biomarkers fundamental neurobiology. The synergism versus exclusionary arguments around about evolutionary traditional psychiatric perspectives was advocated. Additional relevant considerations mammalian PLAY as an opponent process depression, posed by constructivist views emotion also explored, these both neglected target article. Social theory are not incompatible; how cognition extensions 'elicitors,' well cognized versions classic affective behaviors might operate discussed. There no way defend animals, enormous continuity from subcortical architectures, neuromodulators behavioral homologues argues loudly against any assumption discontinuity between human endowment.

Language: Английский

Freudian concepts in the twenty-first century: a neuropsychoanalytic update and discussion DOI

Jane Abrams,

Ross Balchin,

Iftah Biran

et al.

Neuropsychoanalysis, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 26(1), P. 1 - 4

Published: Jan. 2, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Reply to commentaries – the separation distress hypothesis of depression – an update and systematic review DOI Creative Commons

Douglas F. Watt

Neuropsychoanalysis, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 26(1), P. 5 - 31

Published: Jan. 2, 2024

A number of very important challenges to the separation distress hypothesis depression were discussed, clarified, and linked various strands existing literature. Foremost among those is critical challenge define a more comprehensive set clinical precipitants, possibility that may have two prototype elicitors – social defeat loss, with hugely overlapping neurobiology, currently inadequate differentiation in terms biomarkers fundamental neurobiology. The synergism versus exclusionary arguments around about evolutionary traditional psychiatric perspectives was advocated. Additional relevant considerations mammalian PLAY as an opponent process depression, posed by constructivist views emotion also explored, these both neglected target article. Social theory are not incompatible; how cognition extensions 'elicitors,' well cognized versions classic affective behaviors might operate discussed. There no way defend animals, enormous continuity from subcortical architectures, neuromodulators behavioral homologues argues loudly against any assumption discontinuity between human endowment.

Language: Английский

Citations

0