Community‐centred disaster recovery: A call to change the narrative
David Sanderson,
No information about this author
Tim Heffernan,
No information about this author
Marco De Sisto
No information about this author
et al.
Disasters,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 4, 2024
Abstract
This
paper
challenges
current
approaches
to
undertaking
community‐centred
disaster
recovery.
Community‐centred
are
widely
recognised
as
‘the
gold
standard’
for
effective
recovery
from
disasters.
Yet,
they
rarely
applied
well
enough
in
practice.
Challenges
include
the
‘authority’
culture
of
command‐and‐control
agencies,
emphasis
on
discrete
time
frames,
and
reluctance
relinquish
centralised
control.
The
focuses
people's
experiences
New
South
Wales,
Australia,
which
has
experienced
severe
fires
floods
since
2019.
We
undertook
key
informant
interviews
an
online
survey
inquire
into
how
is
enacted.
Our
work
uncovered
widespread
dissatisfaction
with
practices.
discusses
themes
emerging
research
ends
a
call
change
framed
conducted
by
responding
organisations,
underlying
causes
vulnerability
recovery,
measure
success
differently,
alter
narrative
who
‘owns’
Language: Английский
Exploring Paradigm Shifts in Researching Long-Term Disaster Recovery
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 105482 - 105482
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Navigating life after the Kiteezi landfill disaster in Uganda: a study on vulnerability, resilience and quality of life
Mahadih Kyambade,
No information about this author
Afulah Namatovu
No information about this author
Environmental Hazards,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 16
Published: March 7, 2025
This
study
examined
the
quality
of
life,
vulnerabilities,
and
resilience
among
Kiteezi
Landfill
disaster-affected
population
in
Uganda,
focusing
on
community
support
relief
interventions.
A
qualitative
approach
was
employed,
using
purposive
sampling
for
16
in-depth
interviews
(IDIs)
11
focus
group
discussions
(FGDs)
with
residents
from
neighbourhood.
The
IDIs
included
key
informants
directly
affected
by
disaster,
providing
insights
into
their
experiences
Findings
revealed
significant
psychological
social
implications,
highlighting
ongoing
fear,
anxiety,
emotional
distress
that
participants'
mental
health
work
capacity.
Both
unaffected
individuals
reported
declines
well-being,
confirming
literature
extensive
impacts
crises.
Financial
instability
exacerbated
disintegration,
diminishing
respect
support.
Resilience-building
strategies,
particularly
entrepreneurial
activities,
emerged
as
crucial
recovery,
emphasising
importance
economic
empowerment
skill
development.
research
underscores
multi-dimensional
nature
disaster
advocating
a
holistic
integrates
immediate
long-term
resilience-building
efforts
to
restore
individual
well-being.
Language: Английский