Mind-reading in AI and neurotechnology: evaluating claims, hype, and ethical implications for neurorights

AI and Ethics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 4(3), P. 855 - 872

Published: July 16, 2024

Abstract This paper examines claims that the convergence of AI and neurotechnology applications, known as brain-reading, enables reading human minds. The purpose this examination is to investigate whether use terms “brain-reading” “mind-reading” convey current neurotechnological findings carries evidence hype. We conducted an interpretive content analysis 1017 academic articles gain insights into state art examine assertions made by academics. Our revealed up 91% examined suggest possibility mind-reading through brain-reading. Ethical issues discussed frequently include mental privacy, freedom, personhood. study highlights imprecise inconsistent usage term in scientific discourse, which leads exaggerated about BCIs having already achieved capacities beyond their capabilities—or even reaching may never be feasible. While our provides BCI hype concerning alleged capabilities, it also uncovers a ethics, specifically pertaining neurorights. involves hypothetical scenarios where fictional prospect AI-enabled calls for establishment new protective rights.

Language: Английский

---

Who is Becoming Part of What?

AJOB Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16(1), P. 16 - 19

Published: Jan. 2, 2025

Language: Английский

---

MENTAL INTEGRITY AND ETHICS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEUROTECHNOLOGIES

Published: Jan. 15, 2025

Although seemingly in an early stage, neurotechnologies are capturing the attention of international actors. The protection fundamental human rights should be rethought or at least readjusted to new challenges. Even though issue addressed this article may seem purely theoretical, it is crucial as neuroscience stands border between brain activity and what constitutes individual’s identity. not cannot considered just another organ body. A person much more than their neural activity, although necessary for a kind individual they are. Therefore, arises developing adequate legal framework use tandem with technologies.

Language: Английский

---

Assessing the Utility of Organoid Intelligence: Scientific and Ethical Perspectives

Organoids, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 4(2), P. 9 - 9

Published: May 1, 2025

The development of brain organoids from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has expanded research into neurodevelopment, disease modeling, and drug testing. More recently, the concept organoid intelligence (OI) emerged, proposing that these constructs could evolve to support learning, memory, or even sentience. While this perspective driven enthusiasm in field suggested new applications fields such as neuromorphic computing, it also introduces significant scientific conceptual concerns. Current lack anatomical complexity, network organization, sensorimotor integration necessary for Despite this, claims surrounding OI often rely on oversimplified interpretations neural activity, fueled by neurorealist reification biases misattribute neurophysiological properties biologically limited systems. Beyond limitations, framing risks imposing ethical regulatory challenges based speculative concerns rather than empirical evidence. assumption might possess sentience, develop over time, lead unnecessary restrictions legitimate while misrepresenting their actual capabilities. Additionally, comparing biological systems silicon-based computing overlooks fundamental differences scalability, efficiency, predictability, raising questions about whether can meaningfully contribute computational advancements. must recognize limitations models prematurely defining a distinct domain. A more cautious, evidence-driven approach is ensure remain valuable tools neuroscience without overstating potential. To maintain credibility public trust, essential separate narratives grounded research, thus allowing continued progress studies reinforcing misconceptions

Language: Английский

---

THE NORMATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROBLEM

Published: March 31, 2025

Against the backdrop of implementation process AI Act starting in February 2025 , and light opposition from major industry companies to adopting Codes Good Practice this area, following an Summit with its “epicenter” Paris, it seems that narrative underlying European model for regulation is set evolve new perspectives. Starting absolutization risks highlighting positive aspects, face a possible paradigm shift, we find useful draw attention what logic defines as „argumentum ad temperantiam”. At first glance, moderation appears be correct approach relation ambivalent nature technologies. However, validity reasoning cannot depend on certain predefined extremes, would lead scenario where itself contingent subjective way which these “extremes” are defined. The appeal moderation, logical fallacy, assumes truth lies intermediate position between two extremes. And while have consistently advocated normative balance, consider such compromise valid—at least not automatically, without thorough evaluation factual basis behind each “extreme.” Admitting always solution does but evidence, essence precautionary principle appropriate issue, at level syllogism. This because, will highlight conclusion paper, technical evolution artificial intelligence, by increasing degree uncertainty, ultimately de facto inapplicability principle.

Language: Английский

---

At the Crossroads of Neuroethics and Policy: Navigating Neurorights and Neurotechnology Governance

AJOB Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 77 - 79

Published: April 2, 2024

Language: Английский

---

Love Drugs and Academic Myth

AJOB Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(4), P. 253 - 255

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

---

Neurorights Safeguarding Mental Autonomy in a Digital Era

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6(6)

Published: Nov. 25, 2024

It was widely held that no one, not even the devil, could discover a man's intentions because human brain, which contains and thoughts, is an impenetrable fortress. But thanks to development of neurotechnology, it might now be able read someone's mind ideas. While large portion technology has been created for use in hospitals diagnosis or treatment patients with neurological, psychiatric, neurodevelopmental disorders, some products, like brain stimulators promise improve mental performance brainwave monitoring devices let users play video games their minds, are starting appear stores. Massive amounts intricate data gathered via neuroimaging techniques great fit artificial intelligence algorithms process. We discuss how AI helps developing neuroscience vice versa. will further neurorights, protection against hacking theft. New rights protect individual's autonomy over ideas processes would broader definition neurorights. And regulations policies enacted by numerous nations conventions, such as EU Republic Chile. Numerous neurologists, philosophers, jurists, other specialists have expressed varying views regarding scope time due interdisciplinary nature neurorights debate. The five Neurorights Foundation promotes right privacy, personal identification, free choice, fair access augmentation, immunity from bias.

Language: Английский

---