Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 19, 2024
Abstract
Do
authoritarian
regimes
have
distinctive
foreign
policies
compared
to
democracies?
This
chapter
examines
the
range
of
approaches
that
find
domestic
institutions
matter
for
policy,
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
ways
in
which
forms
rule
shape
country’s
policy
choices
and
outcomes.
The
identifies
issues
regime
type
influences,
it
reviews
findings
nature
policy.
It
explores
whether
varieties
authoritarianism
more
than
binary
distinction
between
democratic
nondemocratic
regimes,
causal
mechanisms
link
compares
concludes
by
arguing
transnational
repression
should
be
viewed
as
distinctively
has
no
direct
parallel
countries.
Democratization,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
31(2), P. 290 - 314
Published: Oct. 20, 2023
Authoritarian
regimes
frequently
reach
across
borders
to
repress
against
exiled
dissidents.
Existing
scholarship
has
investigated
the
methods
and
effects
of
transnational
repression.
Yet,
we
lack
knowledge
role
that
political
context
a
host
country
its
relations
origin
diasporas
play
in
incidents
Addressing
this
gap,
use
Freedom
House
dataset
on
physical
acts
repression
(2014–2020)
study
how
regime
type
regional
ties
between
influence
likelihood
incidents.
Conducting
logistic
regression
analysis
with
yearly
directed
dyads,
find
target
exiles
autocratic
states
perpetrators
primarily
rely
cooperation
authorities,
whereas
democratic
they
resort
more
often
direct
attacks.
We
also
show
authoritarian
is
regionally
clustered:
it
occurs
when
home
state
are
situated
within
same
neighbourhood,
partly
members
organization.
Our
article
reveals
some
conditions
relational
dynamics
shape
decisions
strategies
perpetrators.
Politics & Gender,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
20(2), P. 506 - 512
Published: April 17, 2024
An
abstract
is
not
available
for
this
content.
As
you
have
access
to
content,
full
HTML
content
provided
on
page.
A
PDF
of
also
in
through
the
'Save
PDF'
action
button.
International Studies Quarterly,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
68(3)
Published: June 24, 2024
Abstract
Why
do
some
states
assist
other
countries
to
reach
across
national
borders
and
repress
their
diaspora,
while
others
not?
Transnational
repression
involves
host
(including
democracies)
working
closely
with
origin
(typically
autocracies)
transfer
citizens
living
abroad
into
custody
silence
dissent.
We
expect
international
cooperation
on
transnational
rely
a
country’s
domestic
rule
of
law
(opportunity
repress)
economic
ties
the
country
(leverage
cooperate).
To
measure
repression,
we
present
new
data
containing
608
direct
physical
cases
from
2014
2020
involving
160
unique
dyads
(79
31
countries).
test
our
hypotheses
using
dataset
33,615
directed
dyad-years
that
accounts
for
refugee
flows
between
pairs
find
empirical
support
theoretical
argument.
Autocracies
are
better
able
elicit
human
rights
violations
have
shared
interests
weak
law.
Our
findings
provide
one
first
quantitative
foreign
complicity
in
extraterritorial
policy
implications
civil
society
activists
seek
prevent
governments
committing
future
abuses
against
nationals
abroad.
Journal of Human Rights Practice,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(3), P. 770 - 793
Published: Aug. 13, 2024
Abstract
Transnational
Human
Rights
Violations
(THRV)
are
infringements
of
individual
rights
that
originate
outside
the
jurisdiction
in
which
they
take
effect.
Ranging
from
violent
and
criminal
forms
transnational
repression
through
to
coercion
against
targets’
family
members
abroad,
digital
surveillance,
legal
intimidation,
THRVs
today
generate
widespread
systemic
constraints
on
exercise
human
jurisdictions
around
world.
At
present,
however,
targets
typically
find
few
avenues
raise
complaints,
receive
assistance
or
pursue
redress.
This
article
proposes
a
new
domestic
institutional
mechanism
directly
address
this
situation.
It
first
examines
mutually
reinforcing,
additive
effects
censorship
era.
Next,
it
identifies
relevant
standards
showing
state
responsibilities
monitor
counter
within
their
jurisdiction,
growing
recognition
additive,
broad
populations.
The
third
section
policy
responses
United
States,
Australia,
Kingdom,
international
organizations,
noting
none
has
adequately
addressed
contemporary
nature
scope
as
require.
final
argues
meet
obligations,
states
should
establish
Protection
Offices
(TRPOs)
provide
clear
contact
point
for
complaints
support;
report
situation
taking
effect
state’s
jurisdiction;
advise
inform
government
departments
THRV
issues;
develop
evidence-based
recommendations.
We
conclude
by
laying
out
rationale
its
status
National
Institutions
(NHRIs).
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 19, 2024
Abstract
Do
authoritarian
regimes
have
distinctive
foreign
policies
compared
to
democracies?
This
chapter
examines
the
range
of
approaches
that
find
domestic
institutions
matter
for
policy,
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
ways
in
which
forms
rule
shape
country’s
policy
choices
and
outcomes.
The
identifies
issues
regime
type
influences,
it
reviews
findings
nature
policy.
It
explores
whether
varieties
authoritarianism
more
than
binary
distinction
between
democratic
nondemocratic
regimes,
causal
mechanisms
link
compares
concludes
by
arguing
transnational
repression
should
be
viewed
as
distinctively
has
no
direct
parallel
countries.
