The American Naturalist,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 000 - 000
Published: Oct. 11, 2024
AbstractRecent
developments
in
competition
theory-namely,
modern
coexistence
theory
(MCT)-have
aided
empiricists
formulating
tests
of
species
persistence,
coexistence,
and
evolution
from
simple
to
complex
community
settings.
However,
the
parameters
used
predict
competitive
outcomes,
such
as
interaction
coefficients,
invasion
growth
rates,
stabilizing
differences,
remain
biologically
opaque,
making
findings
difficult
generalize
across
ecological
This
article
is
structured
around
five
goals
toward
clarifying
MCT
by
first
a
case
for
modern-day
utility
MacArthur's
consumer-resource
model,
model
with
surprising
complexity
depth:
(i)
describe
uniquely
accessible
language,
deciphering
mathematics
cultivating
deeper
biological
intuition
about
competition's
inner
workings
regardless
what
empirical
toolkit
one
uses;
(ii)
provide
translation
between
mechanisms
MCT;
(iii)
make
explicit
important
but
understated
assumptions
plain
terms;
(iv)
recommendations;
(v)
examine
how
key
concepts
(e.g.,
r/K-selection)
can
be
understood
renewed
clarity
through
lens.
We
end
highlighting
opportunities
explore
tandem
compare
translate
results
currencies
more
unified
science.
While
psychologists
have
extensively
discussed
a
‘theory
crisis’,
there
has
been
no
debate
about
such
crisis
in
biology.
However,
biologists,
especially
those
working
the
fields
of
ecology
and
evolution,
long
communication
failures
between
theoreticians
empiricists.
We
argue
failure
is
one
aspect
theory
because
misapplied
misunderstood
theories
lead
to
poor
hypotheses
research
waste.
review
solutions
for
crisis,
comparing
them
with
methodology-focused
proposed
replication
crisis.
One
neglected
solution
deserving
further
attention
concerns
systematic
mapping
theoretical
models.
conclude
by
discussing
how
promoting
inclusion,
diversity,
equity,
accessibility
(IDEA)
biology
could
contribute
ameliorating
breakdowns
theory-empirical
cycle
PLoS Biology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
22(4), P. e3002583 - e3002583
Published: April 10, 2024
Endosymbiotic
relationships
are
pervasive
across
diverse
taxa
of
life,
offering
key
avenues
for
eco-evolutionary
dynamics.
Although
a
variety
experimental
and
empirical
frameworks
have
shed
light
on
critical
aspects
endosymbiosis,
theoretical
(mathematical
models)
especially
well-suited
certain
tasks.
Mathematical
models
can
integrate
multiple
factors
to
determine
the
net
outcome
endosymbiotic
relationships,
identify
broad
patterns
that
connect
endosymbioses
with
other
systems,
simplify
biological
complexity,
generate
hypotheses
underlying
mechanisms,
evaluate
different
hypotheses,
constraints
limit
interactions,
open
new
lines
inquiry.
This
Essay
highlights
utility
mathematical
in
endosymbiosis
research,
particularly
generating
relevant
hypotheses.
Despite
their
limitations,
be
used
address
known
unknowns
discover
unknown
unknowns.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
99(6), P. 2211 - 2233
Published: July 29, 2024
ABSTRACT
Established
ecological
theory
has
focused
on
unitary
organisms,
and
thus
its
concepts
have
matured
into
a
form
that
often
hinders
rather
than
facilitates
the
study
of
modular
organisms.
Here,
we
use
example
filamentous
fungi
to
develop
enable
integration
non‐unitary
(modular)
organisms
established
community
ecology
theory,
with
particular
focus
spatial
aspects.
In
doing
so,
provide
link
between
fungal
modern
coexistence
(MCT).
We
first
show
how
processes
predictions
made
by
MCT
can
be
used
define
meaningful
scales
in
ecology.
This
leads
novel
concept
unit
interactions
(UCI),
promising
conceptual
tool
for
applying
communities
indeterminate
clonal
growth
hierarchical
individuality.
outline
plausible
mechanisms
structuring
communities,
at
what
habitats
they
are
most
likely
act.
end
describing
challenges
opportunities
empirical
theoretical
research
competitive
coexistence.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
379(1912)
Published: Sept. 4, 2024
All
animals
exhibit
some
combination
of
spatial
and
social
behaviours.
A
diversity
interactions
occurs
between
such
behaviours,
producing
emergent
phenomena
at
the
spatial–social
interface
.
Untangling
interrogating
these
complex,
intertwined
processes
can
be
vital
for
identifying
mechanisms,
causes
consequences
behavioural
variation
in
animal
ecology.
Nevertheless,
integrated
study
phenotypes
environments
(at
interface)
is
its
relative
infancy.
In
this
theme
issue,
we
present
a
collection
papers
chosen
to
expand
along
several
theoretical,
methodological
empirical
dimensions.
They
detail
new
perspectives,
methods,
systems
more,
as
well
offering
roadmaps
applied
outputs
detailing
exciting
directions
field
move
future.
Introduction,
outline
contents
papers,
placing
them
context
what
comes
before,
synthesize
number
takeaways
future
interface.
This
article
part
issue
‘The
interface:
theoretical
integration’.
The American Naturalist,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 000 - 000
Published: Oct. 11, 2024
AbstractRecent
developments
in
competition
theory-namely,
modern
coexistence
theory
(MCT)-have
aided
empiricists
formulating
tests
of
species
persistence,
coexistence,
and
evolution
from
simple
to
complex
community
settings.
However,
the
parameters
used
predict
competitive
outcomes,
such
as
interaction
coefficients,
invasion
growth
rates,
stabilizing
differences,
remain
biologically
opaque,
making
findings
difficult
generalize
across
ecological
This
article
is
structured
around
five
goals
toward
clarifying
MCT
by
first
a
case
for
modern-day
utility
MacArthur's
consumer-resource
model,
model
with
surprising
complexity
depth:
(i)
describe
uniquely
accessible
language,
deciphering
mathematics
cultivating
deeper
biological
intuition
about
competition's
inner
workings
regardless
what
empirical
toolkit
one
uses;
(ii)
provide
translation
between
mechanisms
MCT;
(iii)
make
explicit
important
but
understated
assumptions
plain
terms;
(iv)
recommendations;
(v)
examine
how
key
concepts
(e.g.,
r/K-selection)
can
be
understood
renewed
clarity
through
lens.
We
end
highlighting
opportunities
explore
tandem
compare
translate
results
currencies
more
unified
science.