Working towards decolonial futures in Canada: First steps for non-Indigenous fisheries researchers DOI
Rachael Cadman, Hekia Bodwitch, Kayla M. Hamelin

et al.

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: June 3, 2024

Motivated by the leadership, scholarship, and activism of Indigenous Peoples, there are growing calls to transform decolonize Canadian institutions that govern fisheries research in Canada. As a predominantly non-Indigenous group works at intersection justice, we encounter questions daily about how act as allies these efforts take up this urgent call our own work. Our goal with perspective is synthesize share some what have learned encountering combatting colonialism hope it may offer something other settler researchers who grappling colonization their This synthesis based on both scholarship experiential learning. We look actions advance sovereignty research. fellow likely also struggle similar questions, doing so, can help move towards decolonial futures.

Language: Английский

Disrupting and diversifying the values, voices and governance principles that shape biodiversity science and management DOI Creative Commons

Anne K. Salomon,

Daniel K. Okamoto,

Ḵii'iljuus Barbara J. Wilson

et al.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 378(1881)

Published: May 29, 2023

With climate, biodiversity and inequity crises squarely upon us, never has there been a more pressing time to rethink how we conceptualize, understand manage our relationship with Earth's biodiversity. Here, describe governance principles of 17 Indigenous Nations from the Northwest Coast North America used steward relationships among all components nature, including humans. We then chart colonial origins science use complex case sea otter recovery illuminate ancestral can be mobilized characterize, restore in inclusive, integrative equitable ways. To enhance environmental sustainability, resilience social justice amid today's crises, need broaden who benefits participates sciences by expanding values methodologies that shape such initiatives. In practice, conservation natural resource management shift centralized, siloed approaches those accommodate plurality values, objectives, systems, legal traditions ways knowing. doing so, developing solutions planetary becomes shared responsibility. This article is part theme issue ‘Detecting attributing causes change: needs, gaps solutions’.

Language: Английский

Citations

24

Ocean equity: from assessment to action to improve social equity in ocean governance DOI Creative Commons
Nathan Bennett, Veronica Relano, Katina Roumbedakis

et al.

Frontiers in Marine Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 12

Published: Feb. 3, 2025

Inequity is ubiquitous in the ocean, and social equity receives insufficient attention ocean governance management efforts. Thus, we assert that proponents of sustainability must center future governance, to address past environmental injustices, align with international law conservation policy, realize objectives sustainability. This obligation applies across all marine policy realms, including conservation, fisheries management, climate adaptation economy, socio-political contexts at different geographical scales. Indeed, many governmental, non-governmental, philanthropic organizations are striving advance their focused agendas, policies, programs, initiatives, portfolios. To date, however, there has been limited how meaningfully assess status monitor progress on (aka “ocean equity”) realms. Here, contribute ongoing efforts through providing guidance five steps develop bespoke, fit purpose contextually appropriate assessment monitoring frameworks approaches measure track changes equity. These include: 1) Clearly articulating overarching aim; 2) Convening a participatory group process co-design framework; 3) Identifying important objectives, aspects attributes assess; 4) Selecting developing indicators, methods, measures; 5) Collecting, analyzing evaluating data. Then, discuss four subsequent take into account ensure assessments lead adaptations or transformations improve Communicating results reach key audiences, enable learning inform decision-making; Deliberating actions selecting interventions equity; Ensuring implemented; and, Committing continual cycles monitoring, evaluation, adapting regular intervals. Following these could change oceans governed. The diligent pursuit will help course towards sustainable more representative, inclusive just.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Transitioning toward “deep” knowledge co-production in coastal and marine systems: examining the interplay among governance, power, and knowledge DOI Creative Commons
Ella‐Kari Muhl, Derek Armitage, Kevin Anderson

et al.

Ecology and Society, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 28(4)

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

Knowledge co-production (KCP) is presented as an effective strategy to inform responses complex coastal and marine social-ecological challenges. Co-production processes are further posited improve research decision outcomes in a wide range of problem contexts (e.g., biodiversity conservation, climate change adaptation), for example, by facilitating social learning among diverse actors. As such, KCP increasingly centered global environment initiatives such the United Nations Decade Ocean Science Sustainable Development. However, not panacea, much uncertainty remains about its emergence implementation, particular, manner which broader governance determine interplay knowledge, power, decision-making. Three objectives guide our analysis: (1) interrogate more fully relations knowledge production practices, (colonial) they embedded; (2) consider challenges limitations particular places drawing attention key themes their implications achieving better outcomes; (3) work toward fuller understanding "deep KCP" that cautions against tendency view settings instrumental or techno-managerial problem. A qualitative reflective approach was used examine multiple dimensions KCP, governance, power several contexts, including Canada, New Zealand, Papua Guinea. In analysis highlights importance of: recognizing motivations frame processes; identities, positionality, values influence influenced contexts; highlighting capacity with respect spatial temporal constraints; (4) institutional reforms necessary links governance; (5) relationship between sharing, data sovereignty, governance. We seek encourage those involved considering engage carefully critically these make than box tick.

Language: Английский

Citations

21

Taking care of knowledge, taking care of salmon: towards Indigenous data sovereignty in an era of climate change and cumulative effects DOI Creative Commons
Sara E. Cannon, Jonathan W. Moore, Megan S. Adams

et al.

FACETS, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 9, P. 1 - 21

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

In this paper, we argue that Indigenous data sovereignty (IDS) is vital for addressing threats to ecosystems, as well Peoples re-establishing and maintaining over their territories. knowledge-holders face pressure from non-Indigenous scientists collaborate address environmental problems, while the open movement pressuring them make public. We examine role of IDS in context cumulative effects climate change threaten salmon-bearing ecosystems British Columbia, guided by content an online workshop June 2022 attended exclusively a Tier-1 audience (First Nations and/or technical staff working Nations). Attention required fruitful collaborations between communities researchers impacts affecting watersheds BC. addition, provide steps governments can take assert data, recommendations external use ensure they respect IDS, questions partners discuss guide decision-making about management. Finally, reflect on what learned during process co-creating materials.

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Reflections on the past, present, and potential futures of knowledge hierarchies in ocean biodiversity governance research DOI Creative Commons
Holly J. Niner, David Wilson, Kelly Hoareau

et al.

Frontiers in Marine Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11

Published: July 11, 2024

Governance of the ocean and its biodiversity is deeply entangled within social, political cultural histories. The evolution marine science has been subject to similar influences, we (the authors) consider these factors create, embed reinforce knowledge hierarchies in governance processes associated research that set societal patterns prioritisation exclusion. Such have constructed dominant Western-oriented systems as ‘rational’ ‘objective’ approaches environmental contrast non-Western led a dominance natural (normal) sciences over centralised governance. extraction incorporation traditional into scientific canon through myriad historical contemporary often reproduce hierarchies, do not benefit holders are considered incomplete, inappropriate or absent. As address current conservation challenges, researchers must be aware history extraction, impositions assumptions their fields. Researchers also actively acknowledge histories work avoid marginalisation support ethical, empathetic, rigorous production meets needs society. In this paper, development concept explore case studies diverse geography discipline ranging from action Namibia, application arts-based methodologies legal proceedings focused at an international level, literacies, all which located under umbrella project specifically targeting transformative It becomes evident multi-layered, perpetuating, reproduced even when attempting such methods integration ‘bringing together’ systems. Effective change will therefore require sensitive multi-faceted including embracing discomfort, important with, well through. While there continued tensions between it sine qua non need build commitment understanding where powers lie, rather than ignoring imbalances or, similarly, by idealising approaches.

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Community knowledge as a cornerstone for fisheries management DOI Creative Commons
Kayla M. Hamelin, Anthony Charles, Megan Bailey

et al.

Ecology and Society, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 29(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

The imperative to include stakeholders and rightsholders in fisheries management over the past 30 years has led many changes regimes around world, a key one being move toward collaboration co-management. This is reflected, for example, Canada, where newly revised Fisheries Act (2019, c.14, s.3) incorporates this part by citing "community knowledge" as component decision making management. However, lack of formal definition makes it unclear what exactly meant "community" when how community knowledge can play role To investigate contributions entail, who these communities might include, we conducted scoping literature review using Scopus database synthesize common outcomes from research on involvement goals ecological, social, economic, institutional sustainability. Enablers barriers successful collaborative initiatives were identified, covering conceptual, logistical, communication-related factors. Key recommendations compiled range case studies map path full-spectrum sustainability fisheries. From principles practices, ultimately identified major considerations Canadian context, including need (1) clarify distinction between fishing industry; (2) strengthen social networks communication channels facilitate collective action; (3) track transparently share successes failures efforts outcomes; (4) more explicitly consider well-being objective. our synthesis, there are lessons be learned (social) scientists managers working enhance evidence-based management, whether within Canada or other settings globally.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Fishing (in) the past to inform the future: Lessons from the histories of fisheries management in Lake Malawi and Mbenji Island DOI Creative Commons
David Wilson, Elias Chirwa, Bryson Nkhoma

et al.

Marine Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 173, P. 106589 - 106589

Published: Jan. 13, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Nature, Data, and Power: How Hegemonies Shaped This Special Section DOI
Ambika Kamath, Beans Velocci,

Ashton Wesner

et al.

The American Naturalist, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 200(1), P. 81 - 88

Published: March 24, 2022

AbstractSystems of oppression-racism, colonialism, misogyny, cissexism, ableism, heteronormativity, and more-have long shaped the content practice science. But opportunities to reckon with these influences are rarely found within academic science, even though such critiques well developed in social sciences humanities. In this special section, we attempt bring cross-disciplinary conversations among ecology, evolution, behavior, genetics on one hand critical perspectives from humanities other into pages-and front readers-of a scientific journal. introduction recount reflect process running experiment confront harms done name science envision alternatives.

Language: Английский

Citations

17

Race, Indigenous knowledge, and a relational alternative in fisheries policy research DOI Creative Commons
Nicole Latulippe

Marine Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 175, P. 106600 - 106600

Published: Feb. 6, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Placing knowledge equity at the heart of the UN Ocean Decade: an Early Career Researcher perspective DOI Creative Commons
Lindsey West,

Niza Contreras Liedtke,

Martha Kadijatu Kamara

et al.

Frontiers in Ocean Sustainability, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 3

Published: April 11, 2025

The UN Ocean Decade provides a framework for stakeholders and rights-holders to come together develop transformative ocean solutions sustainable development. We are group of Early Career Researchers (ECR) from diverse backgrounds with shared commitment working toward the outcomes. Our article offers an ECR perspective on fundamental importance knowledge equity achieving Decade's vision “the science we need want.” Knowledge is imperative confronting “business as usual” approach sustainability it requires us confront dismantle extractive practices production. reflect how dominance western in research policy systematic marginalization systems has led inequitable outcomes ocean-dependent people. Using real-world examples, demonstrate progress can make when place at heart our work. conclude call action ensure that embedded both principle practice within framework. invite all professionals join in: (1) adopting intentional reflexivity work; (2) colonial ways thinking, knowing, doing; (3) dismantling hierarchies permeate practice. By implementing these actions, create meaningful inclusive spaces collaboration become more respectful effective global community.

Language: Английский

Citations

0