Moving beyond simplistic representations of land use in conservation DOI Creative Commons
Tobias Kuemmerle

Conservation Letters, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 16, 2024

Abstract Land use is both a major cause of the biodiversity crises and potential solution to it. Decisions about land are made in complex social–ecological systems, yet conservation research, policy, practice often neglect diverse dynamic nature use. A deeper integration system science provides opportunities this context, through transfer concepts, data, methodologies. Specifically, closer exchange between land‐use data developers users will enable common terminology better use, allowing move beyond coarse land‐cover representations Similarly, archetyping regionalization approaches can help embrace, rather than oversimplify, diversity actors practices. Finally, systematically linking portfolios pressures on biodiversity, their direct impact habitat, represent map co‐occurring interacting threats. Together, policymakers planners recognize often‐complex wicked challenges related land, for more context‐specific policymaking planning, targeted interventions.

Language: Английский

Considering land use complexity and overlap is critical for sustainability planning DOI Creative Commons
Marie Pratzer, Oswaldo Maillard, Germán Baldi

et al.

One Earth, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 101247 - 101247

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Only one-third of protected areas in the Chaco effectively curb woodland loss, but their impact extends beyond their boundaries DOI
Pablo Yair Huais,

Tobias Kuemmerle,

Javier Nori

et al.

Biological Conservation, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 308, P. 111196 - 111196

Published: May 2, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Moving beyond simplistic representations of land use in conservation DOI Creative Commons
Tobias Kuemmerle

Conservation Letters, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 16, 2024

Abstract Land use is both a major cause of the biodiversity crises and potential solution to it. Decisions about land are made in complex social–ecological systems, yet conservation research, policy, practice often neglect diverse dynamic nature use. A deeper integration system science provides opportunities this context, through transfer concepts, data, methodologies. Specifically, closer exchange between land‐use data developers users will enable common terminology better use, allowing move beyond coarse land‐cover representations Similarly, archetyping regionalization approaches can help embrace, rather than oversimplify, diversity actors practices. Finally, systematically linking portfolios pressures on biodiversity, their direct impact habitat, represent map co‐occurring interacting threats. Together, policymakers planners recognize often‐complex wicked challenges related land, for more context‐specific policymaking planning, targeted interventions.

Language: Английский

Citations

2