Journal of Primary Care & Community Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Healthcare
providers
often
hesitate
to
discuss
medical
cannabis
(MC)
due
limited
understanding,
risks
and
benefits,
misinformation.
This
reluctance
is
notable
with
older
adult
patients,
despite
MC's
potential
benefits.
study
investigates
whether
primary
care
(PCPs)
routinely
inquire
about
MC
when
treating
adults
the
frequency
of
such
inquiries.
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: June 19, 2024
Background:
In
2020,
the
Lebanese
parliament
legalized
cannabis
for
medical
and
industrial
use,
sparking
diverse
reactions
among
health
care
professionals
(HCP).
Few
studies
have
been
conducted
to
reflect
position
of
HCP
on
topic,
no
previous
targeted
all
physicians
with
relevant
specialties
or
had
a
large
sample
size.
The
current
study
aimed
assess
knowledge,
attitude,
practice
community
toward
medicinal
(MC).
Methods:
A
cross-sectional
was
targeting
from
different
backgrounds
specialties.
survey
questionnaire
disseminated
through
scientific
societies
in
Order
Physicians
other
professional
bodies.
An
online
shared
oncologists,
rheumatologists,
psychiatrists,
neurologists,
pharmacists,
psychotherapists
across
geographic
regions.
It
covered
questions
about
sociodemographic
details,
related
MC.
Descriptive
bivariate
analyses
were
performed.
total
202
responded
survey,
yielding
response
rate
34%.
Results:
Eighteen
percent
participants
described
their
level
knowledge
indications
MC
as
good.
Twenty-five
respondents
are
willing
prescribe,
30%
"may
consider"
it.
Among
those
majority
may
consider
treat
chronic
pain,
palliative
care,
post-traumatic
stress
disorder,
epilepsy,
anxiety.
Respondents'
side
effects
is
follows:
driving
difficulties
(82%),
addiction
(69%),
drug
interactions
(65%),
weight
gain
(43%).
Willingness
prescribe
varies
by
specialty,
clinical
experience
MC,
gender.
expressed
concerns
potential
harm
using
indicated
that
legalization
would
negatively
impact
society.
Sixty-nine
reported
not
receiving
any
formal
education
agreed
need
expand
its
effects.
should
be
dispensed
based
prescription
physician
special
training
recognized
importance
establishing
national
registry
patients
undergoing
treatment,
well
necessity
guidelines
approval.
Conclusion:
data
indicate
attitudes
prescribing
vary
gender,
experience.
Implementation
effective
educational
strategies
Lebanon
enhance
promote
proper
use
crucial.
Journal of Cannabis Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: July 24, 2024
Abstract
Background
Use
of
cannabis-based
products
is
becoming
more
frequent,
and
it
important
that
healthcare
professionals
are
informed
confident
about
them
when
making
evidence-based
decisions
their
use.
This
study
aimed
to
gain
an
international
perspective
on
the
attitudes,
knowledge,
confidence
products.
Methods
An
online
questionnaire
regarding
these
was
completed
by
1580
(neurologists,
psychiatrists,
general
practitioners,
pharmacists
nurses)
from
16
countries
across
Asia,
Europe,
Oceania,
South
America,
Middle
East.
Results
Respondents
expressed
a
high
level
interest
in
(median
score
9
out
10)
reported
they
felt
knowledgeable
6
7).
They
providing
patients
with
information
products,
returning
median
scores
5
7
for
legality
regulations,
benefits
risks,
respectively.
Despite
this,
sought
further
areas
including
legality,
neurobiology,
scientific
evidence.
Finally,
59%
(n
=
930)
respondents
considered
robust
clinical
trial
evidence
as
most
factor
ensure
patient
safety
context
Few
nominally
significant
differences
emerged
between
different
specialities
or
regions.
Conclusion
In
conclusion,
this
large
survey
attitudes
held
towards
revealed
demand
information.
Limitations
include
potential
sample
bias
limited
external
validity.
Drug Science Policy and Law,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Background
In
the
UK,
there
are
over
40,000
specialist
clinicians
who
eligible
to
prescribe
cannabis-based
medical
products
(CBMPs);
however,
only
approximately
100
actively
do
so
(0.25%).
Since
legalization
of
cannabis
in
UK
2018,
has
been
a
limited
number
prescriptions
issued
by
National
Health
Service
(NHS).
Availability
through
private
healthcare
is
rising,
with
current
estimates
suggesting
that
25,000–30,000
patients
accessing
though
clinics.
Objective
The
objectives
this
study
were
(1)
assess
attitudes,
perceived
knowledge
and
concerns
around
among
medical/health
care
professionals
(HCPs)
(2)
examine
differences
between
had
previously
undertaken
training
on
those
not.
Methods
Using
quantitative
cross-sectional
survey
design,
questionnaire
was
presented
participants
explore
their
personal
professional
perspectives
towards
cannabis.
Questions
addressed
HCPs’
knowledge,
confidence
about
prescribing,
alongside
experiences
attitudes
toward
legalization.
Results
A
total
72
HCPs
completed
survey,
which
55.6%
received
trained
reported
statistically
significant
higher
cannabis,
greater
prescribing
increased
recognition
its
value
as
medicine
compared
non-trained
colleagues
(
p
<
0.05
for
all
comparisons).
Notably,
individuals
significantly
less
concerned
use
lacks
sufficient
evidence
efficacy
X
2
=
8.74,
0.003).
Barriers
prescription
cost
most
endorsed
both
HCP
groups.
Conclusions
found
undergoing
associated
hesitancy
CBMPs
medicinal
value.
American Journal on Addictions,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 24, 2024
Abstract
Background
and
Objectives
Limited
evidence
guides
the
efficacy
safety
of
cannabis
for
therapeutic
purposes
(CTP).
Healthcare
providers
lack
requisite
knowledge
to
advise
support
patients.
This
study
aimed
describe
compare
several
aspects
initial
CTP
interactions
across
different
provider
types.
Methods
Adult
consumers
(
N
=
507)
from
United
States
completed
an
anonymous
online
survey
about
their
interaction
with
healthcare
provider.
Providers
were
categorized
into
four
groups
(Mental
Health
[MH],
Family
Medicine
[FM],
Medical
Clinics
[MC],
Other
Specialty
[OS]).
Analyses
compared
(e.g.,
risk
mitigation,
recommendations,
satisfaction/confidence)
groups.
Results
Less
than
half
sample
reported
discussion
risks
(44.0%)
or
follow‐ups
at
subsequent
visits
(46.7%).
Recommendations
(where
obtain,
consumption
method,
dose,
frequency,
authorization)
uncommon
(9.7%–25.2%).
While
MH
group
highest
rates
mitigation
behaviors,
regression
models
adjusted
sociodemographic
characteristics
largely
nonsignificant.
For
MC
was
more
likely
report
receiving
all
recommendations
p
<
.05).
Younger
age
greater
cannabis‐related
problems
increased
likelihood
recommendations.
Discussion
Conclusions
focused
on
but
generally
lacked
comprehensive
that
could
potentially
promote
safe
use.
Data
perspectives
need
guidelines
develop
training
practices.
Scientific
Significance
first
time,
this
explored
experiences
a
variety
providers.
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Healthcare
providers
often
hesitate
to
discuss
medical
cannabis
(MC)
due
limited
understanding,
risks
and
benefits,
misinformation.
This
reluctance
is
notable
with
older
adult
patients,
despite
MC's
potential
benefits.
study
investigates
whether
primary
care
(PCPs)
routinely
inquire
about
MC
when
treating
adults
the
frequency
of
such
inquiries.