External Validation of the 4C (Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium) Mortality Score in a Teaching Hospital in Brazil
Katelyn A. Bruno,
No information about this author
Henrique Thadeu Periard Mussi,
No information about this author
Alessandro Bruno
No information about this author
et al.
Cureus,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 2, 2025
Background
The
4C
(Coronavirus
Clinical
Characterization
Consortium)
Mortality
Score
has
demonstrated
good
discrimination
in
COVID-19
but
not
been
widely
validated
Brazil.
is
a
clinical
tool
developed
during
the
pandemic
to
predict
in-hospital
mortality
for
patients
admitted
with
COVID-19.
It
was
derived
from
large
dataset
of
hospitalized
United
Kingdom
and
provides
simple
yet
effective
way
stratify
based
on
their
risk
death.
Objective
This
study
aimed
determine
accuracy
university
teaching
hospital.
Methods
observational,
longitudinal,
retrospective,
conducted
180-bed
hospital
Rio
de
Janeiro,
We
included
all
followed
them
until
discharge.
calculated
age,
sex,
Charlson
index,
respiratory
rate,
peripheral
oxygen
saturation
(room
air),
Glasgow
Coma
Scale,
serum
urea,
C-reactive
protein
(CRP)
level.
primary
outcome
mortality.
Results
208
participants,
median
age
63
years.
Among
them,
111
(53%)
were
male;
52
(25%)
had
cardiovascular
disease,
83
(39%)
cancer.
39.9%.
Independent
predictors
hemoglobin,
CRP,
mechanical
ventilation,
need
vasopressors.
Score's
area
under
receiver
operating
characteristic
curve
(AUC-ROC)
89.9%.
Conclusion
excellent
population.
Language: Английский
Predicting the risk of intensive care unit admission in patients with COVID-19 presenting in the emergency room: Development and evaluation of the CROSS score
Clinical Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 10, 2025
Abstract
Background
Existing
risk
evaluation
tools
underperform
in
predicting
intensive
care
unit
(ICU)
admission
for
patients
with
the
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19).
This
study
aimed
to
develop
and
evaluate
an
accurate
calculator-free
clinical
tool
ICU
at
emergency
room
(ER)
presentation.
Methods
Data
from
COVID-19
a
nationwide
German
cohort
(March
2020-January
2023)
were
analyzed.
Candidate
predictors
selected
based
on
literature
expertise.
A
score,
within
seven
days
of
ER
presentation,
was
developed
using
elastic
net
logistic
regression
northern
(derivation
cohort),
evaluated
southern
(evaluation
cohort)
externally
validated
Colombian
cohort.
Performance
through
discrimination,
calibration,
utility
against
existing
tools.
Results
rates
30.8%
cohort,
n=1295,
median
age
60,
38.1%
female),
28.1%
n=1123,
58,
36.9%
30.3%
(Colombian
n=780,
57,
38.8%
female).
The
11-point
CROSS
Confusion,
Respiratory
rate,
Oxygen
Saturation
(with
or
without
concurrent
supplemental
oxygen),
oxygen
Supplementation,
demonstrated
good
discrimination
(area
under
curve
(AUC):
0.77
cohort;
0.69
superior
compared
Mortality-predicting
performed
poorly
COVID-19.
Conclusions
score
effectively
predicts
ER.
Further
studies
are
needed
assess
its
generalizability
other
settings.
not
recommended
prediction.
Language: Английский
Leveraging near-real-time patient and population data to incorporate fluctuating risk of severe COVID-19: development and prospective validation of a personalised risk prediction tool
EClinicalMedicine,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
81, P. 103114 - 103114
Published: Feb. 21, 2025
Language: Английский
Impact of Surge Strain and Pandemic Progression on Prognostication by an Established COVID-19–Specific Severity Score
Critical Care Explorations,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
5(12), P. e1021 - e1021
Published: Dec. 1, 2023
Many
U.S.
State
crisis
standards
of
care
(CSC)
guidelines
incorporated
Sequential
Organ
Failure
Assessment
(SOFA),
a
sepsis-related
severity
score,
in
pandemic
triage
algorithms.
However,
SOFA
performed
poorly
COVID-19.
Although
disease-specific
scores
may
perform
better,
their
prognostic
utility
over
time
and
overcrowded
settings
remains
unclear.We
evaluated
prognostication
by
the
modified
4C
(m4C)
COVID-19-specific
prognosticator
that
demonstrated
good
predictive
capacity
early
pandemic,
as
potential
tool
to
standardize
across
hospital-surge
environments.Retrospective
observational
cohort
study.Two
hundred
eighty-one
hospitals
an
administrative
healthcare
dataset.A
total
298,379
hospitalized
adults
with
COVID-19
were
identified
from
March
1,
2020,
January
31,
2022.
m4C
calculated
admission
diagnosis
codes,
vital
signs,
laboratory
values.Hospital-surge
index,
severity-weighted
measure
caseload,
was
for
each
hospital-month.
Discrimination
in-hospital
mortality
surge
index-adjusted
models
measured
area
under
receiver
operating
characteristic
curves
(AUC).
Calibration
assessed
training
on
waves
measuring
fit
(deviation
bisector)
subsequent
waves.From
2020
2022,
admitted
281
hospitals.
adequately
discriminated
wave
1
(AUC
0.779
[95%
CI,
0.769-0.789]);
discrimination
lower
(wave
2:
0.772
0.765-0.779];
3:
0.746
0.743-0.750];
delta:
0.707
0.702-0.712];
omicron:
0.729
0.721-0.738]).
reduced
calibration
contemporaneous
persisted
despite
periodic
recalibration.
Performance
characteristics
similar
without
adjustment
surge.Mortality
prediction
score
remained
robust
strain,
making
it
attractive
when
is
most
needed.
performance
has
deteriorated
recent
waves.
CSC
relying
defined
prognosticators,
especially
dynamic
disease
processes
like
COVID-19,
warrant
frequent
reappraisal
ensure
appropriate
resource
allocation.
Language: Английский
Persistent disabilities 28 months after COVID-19 hospitalization, a prospective cohort study
Bertrand Renaud,
No information about this author
Richard Chocron,
No information about this author
Guillaume Reverdito
No information about this author
et al.
ERJ Open Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 00104 - 2024
Published: May 16, 2024
Background
Limited
data
are
available
on
long-term
respiratory
disabilities
in
patients
following
acute
COVID-19.
Patients
and
Methods
This
prospective,
monocentric,
observational
cohort
study
included
admitted
to
our
hospital
with
COVID-19
between
March
3
April
24,
2020.
Clinical,
functional,
radiological
were
collected
up
28
months
after
discharge.
Results
Among
715
hospitalized
for
COVID-19,
493
(69.0%)
discharged
alive.
We
could
access
complete
medical
records
268/493
(54.4%);
138/268
(51.5%)
exhibited
persistent
symptoms
agreed
the
collection
follow-up.
predominantly
male
(64.5%),
a
mean
(±
sd
)
age
of
58.9±15.3
years.
At
last
follow-up,
leading
asthenia
(31.5%),
dyspnoea
(29.8%),
neuropsychological
(17.7%).
Lung
function
improved
visit.
Mean
diffusing
capacity
lung
carbon
monoxide
(DLCO)
was
77.8%
predicted
value,
total
(TLC)
83.5%,
O
2
desaturation
during
exercise
(O
desaturation)
−2.3%.
While
DLCO
over
entire
period,
TLC
early
phase
late
phase.
Except
those
comorbidities,
only
one
patient
presented
minor
functional
chest
alterations
at
28-months.
Conclusion
alive
showed
clinical
symptoms,
parameters
signs
post
infection.
Persistent
consisted
mainly
dyspnoea,
returning
normal.
One
without
prior
issues
moderate
pulmonary
fibrosis.
Language: Английский
Optimizing Predictive Models in Healthcare Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Approach with a COVID-19 Case Study
Communications in computer and information science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 178 - 192
Published: Oct. 10, 2024
Language: Английский
Impact on clinical guideline adherence of Orient-COVID, a clinical decision support system based on dynamic decision trees for COVID19 management: a randomized simulation trial with medical trainees
International Journal of Medical Informatics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
195, P. 105772 - 105772
Published: Dec. 20, 2024
Development of a prediction model for 30-day COVID-19 hospitalization and death in a national cohort of Veterans Health Administration patients – March 2022 - April 2023
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 18, 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective
Develop
models
to
predict
30-day
COVID-19
hospitalization
and
death
in
the
Omicron
era
for
clinical
research
applications.
Material
Methods
We
used
comprehensive
electronic
health
records
from
a
national
cohort
of
patients
Veterans
Health
Administration
(VHA)
who
tested
positive
SARS-CoV-2
between
March
1,
2022,
31,
2023.
Full
incorporated
84
predictors,
including
demographics,
comorbidities,
receipt
vaccinations
anti-SARS-CoV-2
treatments.
Parsimonious
included
19
predictors.
created
or
death,
hospitalization,
all-cause
mortality.
Super
Learner
ensemble
machine
learning
algorithm
fit
prediction
models.
Model
performance
was
assessed
with
area
under
receiver
operating
characteristic
curve
(AUC),
Brier
scores,
calibration
intercepts
slopes
20%
holdout
dataset.
Results
Models
were
trained
on
198,174
patients,
whom
8%
hospitalized
died
within
30
days
testing
positive.
AUCs
full
ranged
0.80
(hospitalization)
0.91
(death).
scores
close
0,
lowest
error
mortality
model
(Brier
score:
0.01).
All
three
well
calibrated
<0.23
<1.05.
performed
comparably
Discussion
These
may
be
risk
stratification
inform
treatment
identify
high-risk
inclusion
trials.
Conclusions
developed
that
accurately
estimate
following
emergence
variant
setting
antiviral
Language: Английский