Playing the Publish or Perish Game: Guidance for Doctoral Students and Early Career Faculty DOI Creative Commons
Daniella Smith, Yunfei Du, Denice Adkins

et al.

Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 16, 2024

“Publish or perish,” the idea that one must consistently publish to succeed in an academic career is a well-known adage within higher education (Schaberg, 2016). Specifically, Bond (2023) shares publications are promoted as path success. The scholarly output of professors simultaneously affects reputations and their institutions. Similarly, doctoral programs often require students before they graduate. When applying for positions, having beyond dissertation seen strength by prospective employers. Although viewed strength, Huang (2021) discusses some challenges have with publishing, including lack understanding publication process. Many who master’s degree may complete thesis. However, thesis process diverges from journal articles because procedures differ. further notes pressure high-quality, journals another challenge. These identified best rigor involved peer review process, typically accept fewer papers per year. Finally, competitive inability on time can cause anxiety among students. Researchers called evaluation publishing practices academia. For example, Saxena, Godfrey, Yannessa explain expectations lead production low-quality increase unethical behaviors such plagiarism. Moreover, inexperienced writers seek validate research relying willing acceptance predatory (Mertkan, Aliusta, & Bayrakli, 2022). flood internet do not adhere rigorous peer-review standards. Consequently, inferior has been vetted repetitively cited. Since navigating skill be gained, Dyke (2019) suggests it necessary teach early-career academics how manage rigors expectations. asserts learning stress essential successfully publishing. Also, new scholars taught research’s benefits potential impact. argues publishers play crucial role teaching skills. Instead solely universities, develop courses clarify writing publications. include content about basic editing skills submitting revisions. panel recognizes indeed game. component progression at many universities. Therefore, response library information science early professionals’ professional development needs, this seeks advise strengthening clarifying This will expert editors editorial board members over century combined experience. Attendees participate discussion receive suggestions efficiently articles. panelists Drs. John Budd Denice Adkins (co-editors JELIS), Yunfei Du (editorial member Maria Cahill (co-editor School Library Research), Vanessa Reyes International Journal Information, Diversity, Inclusion). moderator Dr. Daniella Smith Public Quarterly). Program Format interactive program polls audience engagement online whiteboard collect questions after presentation. format follows: Session introduction: introduce session sharing presentation objectives academia.. Panel Each panelist themselves experience Topic Discussion: answer related following topics. Understanding process: presenters share peer-reviewed used pros cons Implementing strategies quicker: Panelists provide streamlining Submitting revisions options addressing comments: Our experts discuss article do’s don’ts getting published requested. Preparing journals: There difference between casual writing. differences examples regarding Identifying appropriate suggest determine areas avoid journals. tools resources: Authors curate acquire help them navigate favorite resources. Making enjoyable: embracing making fun. Final words advice questions: conclude final thoughts.

Language: Английский

The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review DOI Creative Commons
Elena Tikhonova, Lilia Raitskaya

Journal of language and Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(1), P. 5 - 24

Published: March 30, 2024

Introduction: Research culture is the core of many processes in science. It a broad concept presumably entailing practices, traditions, norms, etc. that prevail among researchers and other stakeholders field. Its definition, architecture, taxonomy are essential generating pursuing scientific policies at universities countries. As there lack comprehensive reviews on research culture, present publication aspires to fill existing gap knowledge. This review aims define build an architecture based relevant literature indexed Scopus database. Method: The problem, concept, context (PCC) framework was applied establish effective search strategy word questions corresponding aim. Based Arksey O'Malley's methodology (2005) PRISMA checklist (2020) for systematic reviews, authors sorted out 56 publications scoping review. In addition, bibliometric analysis examine Results: Using analysis, were distributed by year, country, most prolific authors, sources, fields, affiliation, type publication. With help VOSviewer, singled four thematic clusters (research culture; medical biomedical research, ethics, clinical studies human experiments). After synthesizing data extracted from documents under review, defined; components summed up; made up. analysed findings contrast with offering their own definition its taxonomy, culture. Conclusion: current adds understanding gist, component classification. limitation related period (2019-2024) may be overcome further historic perspective would broaden perceptions origin modern negative aspects.

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Global dioxin research trends and focal points: A century-long visual and bibliometric analysis (1923–2022) DOI
Sa’ed H. Zyoud

Toxicology and Industrial Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 40(9-10), P. 504 - 518

Published: June 5, 2024

Dioxin-like compounds, recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as among most enduring toxic chemical substances in environment, are linked to various occupational activities and industrial accidents worldwide. The aim of this study was examine present research publications on dioxins, pinpoint current trends, identify gaps, highlight potential avenues for future exploration field. period relevant articles ranged from 1923 December 31, 2022, these were sourced Scopus database. analysis involved identification key contributors field visualization topics, themes, international collaboration. VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20) used analysis. A total 11,620 dioxins documented predominant category documents comprised 9780 original articles, which represents 84.17% publications. United States lead number publications, with 3992 (34.35%), followed Japan, 1429 (12.3%), China, 1005 (8.65%), Germany, 974 (8.38%). Before 2002, scholarly attention focused primarily health effects, environmental fate, mechanism toxicity tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). However, a noticeable change focus has been observed since highlighting emergence topic related effects fate polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) dibenzofurans (PFDFs). This is first conduct comprehensive quantitative bibliometric over time. These findings indicate significant increase overall growth dioxin literature past 30 years. may prove crucial guiding organizing subsequent investigations dioxins.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Recent breakthroughs in genetic and brain structural correlates of suicidal behaviours: A short review DOI Creative Commons
Zuriel Ceja, Laura S. van Velzen, Adrián I. Campos

et al.

Biological Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Playing the Publish or Perish Game: Guidance for Doctoral Students and Early Career Faculty DOI Creative Commons
Daniella Smith, Yunfei Du, Denice Adkins

et al.

Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 16, 2024

“Publish or perish,” the idea that one must consistently publish to succeed in an academic career is a well-known adage within higher education (Schaberg, 2016). Specifically, Bond (2023) shares publications are promoted as path success. The scholarly output of professors simultaneously affects reputations and their institutions. Similarly, doctoral programs often require students before they graduate. When applying for positions, having beyond dissertation seen strength by prospective employers. Although viewed strength, Huang (2021) discusses some challenges have with publishing, including lack understanding publication process. Many who master’s degree may complete thesis. However, thesis process diverges from journal articles because procedures differ. further notes pressure high-quality, journals another challenge. These identified best rigor involved peer review process, typically accept fewer papers per year. Finally, competitive inability on time can cause anxiety among students. Researchers called evaluation publishing practices academia. For example, Saxena, Godfrey, Yannessa explain expectations lead production low-quality increase unethical behaviors such plagiarism. Moreover, inexperienced writers seek validate research relying willing acceptance predatory (Mertkan, Aliusta, & Bayrakli, 2022). flood internet do not adhere rigorous peer-review standards. Consequently, inferior has been vetted repetitively cited. Since navigating skill be gained, Dyke (2019) suggests it necessary teach early-career academics how manage rigors expectations. asserts learning stress essential successfully publishing. Also, new scholars taught research’s benefits potential impact. argues publishers play crucial role teaching skills. Instead solely universities, develop courses clarify writing publications. include content about basic editing skills submitting revisions. panel recognizes indeed game. component progression at many universities. Therefore, response library information science early professionals’ professional development needs, this seeks advise strengthening clarifying This will expert editors editorial board members over century combined experience. Attendees participate discussion receive suggestions efficiently articles. panelists Drs. John Budd Denice Adkins (co-editors JELIS), Yunfei Du (editorial member Maria Cahill (co-editor School Library Research), Vanessa Reyes International Journal Information, Diversity, Inclusion). moderator Dr. Daniella Smith Public Quarterly). Program Format interactive program polls audience engagement online whiteboard collect questions after presentation. format follows: Session introduction: introduce session sharing presentation objectives academia.. Panel Each panelist themselves experience Topic Discussion: answer related following topics. Understanding process: presenters share peer-reviewed used pros cons Implementing strategies quicker: Panelists provide streamlining Submitting revisions options addressing comments: Our experts discuss article do’s don’ts getting published requested. Preparing journals: There difference between casual writing. differences examples regarding Identifying appropriate suggest determine areas avoid journals. tools resources: Authors curate acquire help them navigate favorite resources. Making enjoyable: embracing making fun. Final words advice questions: conclude final thoughts.

Language: Английский

Citations

0