Truthfulness as the basis for ethical safeguards in deceptive research: An interview study with researchers DOI
Kamiel Verbeke, Jan Piasecki, Dieter Baeyens

et al.

Accountability in Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 29

Published: June 3, 2024

Ethical safeguards such as debriefing are often recommended or required for research studies in which participants deceived. However, existing guidance on these seems insufficiently coherent and precise, may be associated with their suboptimal implementation practice. This study aimed to contribute a more precise framework of ethical deceptive through semi-structured interviews diverse sample 24 researchers who had significant experience deception. Interviewees discussed they implemented how, well relation the notion truthfulness (i.e., intentional communication true information). Moreover, interviewees provided variety reasons against implementing safeguards, how varied particular context study. Overall, current contributes understanding that could useful guiding ethics reviewers decision-making, although certain imprecisions incoherent aspects remain need further investigation normative reflection.

Language: Английский

Is it even worth it? The ethics of researching armed groups in ‘the field’ DOI Creative Commons
Niamatullah Ibrahimi, Romain Malejacq

Conflict Security and Development, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 34

Published: Sept. 30, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Truthfulness as the basis for ethical safeguards in deceptive research: An interview study with researchers DOI
Kamiel Verbeke, Jan Piasecki, Dieter Baeyens

et al.

Accountability in Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 29

Published: June 3, 2024

Ethical safeguards such as debriefing are often recommended or required for research studies in which participants deceived. However, existing guidance on these seems insufficiently coherent and precise, may be associated with their suboptimal implementation practice. This study aimed to contribute a more precise framework of ethical deceptive through semi-structured interviews diverse sample 24 researchers who had significant experience deception. Interviewees discussed they implemented how, well relation the notion truthfulness (i.e., intentional communication true information). Moreover, interviewees provided variety reasons against implementing safeguards, how varied particular context study. Overall, current contributes understanding that could useful guiding ethics reviewers decision-making, although certain imprecisions incoherent aspects remain need further investigation normative reflection.

Language: Английский

Citations

0