Exploring contextual influences in collaboration: A sensemaking perspective
Policy Studies Journal,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 7, 2025
Abstract
Almost
all
existing
models
explaining
collaborative
actions
focus
on
the
interactive
dynamics
among
collaborators.
While
these
are
thought
to
be
influenced
by
external
contextual
forces,
there
is
little
theory
or
empirical
work
documenting
this
relationship.
Employing
a
unique
and
comprehensive
database
of
890
tensions,
we
adopt
sensemaking
approach
explore
role
fast‐evolving
ambiguous
context
in
governance.
We
find
that
heightened
sociopolitical
controversies
were
“weaponized”
certain
stakeholder
groups
influence
collaboration
through
forming
intensifying
political
narrative,
narrative
was
aided
convenient
adoption
evolving
economic
financial
circumstances
as
“ammunition.”
These
strategic
choices,
combined,
produced
significant
for
adapt.
insights
highlight
theoretical
significance
forces
intergovernmental
governance
call
policymakers'
attention
uncertainties.
Language: Английский
Exploring power imbalance in reciprocal scientific information sharing within a hydraulic fracturing policy subsystem
Review of Policy Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 17, 2025
Abstract
Sharing
scientific
and
technical
information
plays
a
vital
role
in
fostering
more
deliberate
political
dynamics
within
policy
subsystems,
according
to
the
Advocacy
Coalition
Framework
(ACF).
However,
obstacles
this
exchange
are
not
well
understood.
Our
research,
guided
by
theories
of
social
network
embeddedness,
explores
how
power
imbalances
relate
reciprocal
information.
Using
visualization
quadratic
assignment
procedure
multiple
regression
on
data
from
local
hydraulic
fracturing
subsystem
New
York,
we
find
that
negatively
affect
sharing
subsystem,
adverse
relationship
is
consistent
regardless
shared
beliefs.
Despite
presence
collaborative
relationships,
hinder
sharing.
Conversely,
trust
among
actors
helps
lessen
detrimental
effects
exchange.
These
findings
contribute
ACF
process
literature
highlighting
as
barriers
elucidating
these
interplay
with
beliefs,
collaboration,
trust,
affecting
dissemination
subsystems.
Language: Английский
Evaluating conflict in collaborative environmental governance: A study of environmental justice councils
Review of Policy Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 30, 2024
Abstract
The
formal
engagement
of
diverse
stakeholder
groups
in
environmental
policy
design
and
implementation
is
increasingly
common.
While
engaging
stakeholders
common
fora
can
help
address
complex
dilemmas,
insofar
as
different
have
varying
perspectives
resources
to
contribute,
this
same
variance
lead
intractable
conflicts.
scholars
developed
various
conceptual
approaches
understanding
conflict
the
process,
few
applied
understand
how
conflicts
are
reflected
interpersonal
communications
among
stakeholders.
In
article,
we
draw
on
justice
council
meeting
minutes
use
qualitative,
computational,
statistical
methods
analyze,
over
time:
(i)
extent
severity
observed
actors;
(ii)
association
between
actor‐level
attributes
conflict,
conveyed
two‐way
communication
(iii)
actor's
sector
change
conflict;
(iv)
variation
across
activities.
By
exploring
overtime
actors
(e.g.,
sectoral
affiliation
attributes),
our
analysis
addresses
not
only
influence
number
interactions
for
an
actor
at
but
also
they
interacting
by
leveraging
their
position
network.
Our
article
contributes
study
public
process
collaborative
governance,
drawing
attention
materializes
a
forum
engaged
making.
Language: Английский
Governance and global collaboration in non‐democratic countries
Public Administration Review,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
Abstract
The
concept
of
good
governance
(GG)
has
emerged
from
the
corridors
global
institutions,
influencing
changes,
particularly
in
non‐democratic
countries.
This
paper
uses
both
qualitative
and
quantitative
approaches
to
address
following
question:
To
what
extent
does
collaboration
(GC)
impact
countries?
incorporates
proxies
for
GC,
more
deeply
exploring
dynamics
frameworks
that
link
GC
governance.
variables
measuring
institutional
globalization
have
a
positive
on
governance,
while
openness
information
negative
impact.
These
mixed
results
invite
further
research
GC.
However,
national
visions
can
set
stage
future
agendas
combine
partnership,
collaboration,
transparency,
innovation
achieve
GG.
Language: Английский
Generational Differences in the Public Sector
Deleted Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
2024(4), P. 747 - 752
Published: Dec. 31, 2024
The
objective
of
this
research
was
to
analyze
how
generational
differences
impact
the
public
sector,
specifically
in
aspects
such
as
technology
management,
traditional
management
methods,
and
administration.
A
systematic
review
methodology
used,
consisting
selection
relevant
articles
published
between
2017
2024
Spanish
English,
from
Scopus
Scielo
databases.
Key
terms
Generation
X,
millennials,
governance
were
considered,
inclusion
exclusion
criteria
applied
ensure
relevance
sources.
initial
analysis
identified
310
articles,
which
30
pertinent
studies
selected
after
applying
defined
criteria.
results
highlight
intergenerational
tensions
related
technological
adaptation
work
emphasizing
need
for
inclusive
strategies
improve
cohesion
modernize
sector
Language: Английский