Why the post-identification era is long overdue: Commentary on the current controversy over forensic feature comparison as applied to forensic firearms examination
The International Journal of Evidence & Proof,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 5, 2024
In
this
commentary,
we
critically
review
recurring
arguments
for
and
against
the
discipline
of
forensic
feature
comparison
as
applied
to
firearms
examination
from
various
commentators
within
outside
science.
One
mainstream
criticisms
that
address,
among
others,
is
field
cannot
demonstrate
sufficient
proficiency
robustness
based
on
empirical
(i.e.,
black-box)
studies.
While
lack
empirically
demonstrated
examiner
a
valid
concern
powerful
concept
in
short
term
(e.g.,
admissibility
proceedings),
many
critics
reduce
their
discussion
solely
need
measure
through
error
rates.
However,
exclusive
focus
aggregate
expert
performance
metrics,
here
referred
diagnosticism,
remains
surface-level
perspective.
It
provides
an
incomplete
account
because
these
metrics
do
not
represent—but
are
often
confused
with—the
notion
evidentiary
value
findings,
i.e.,
observations
made
examined
items
individual
cases.
We
argue
diagnosticism
should
be
contrasted
complemented
with
selectivity,
diagnostic
capacity
observed
marks
features
items.
scientists
report
probed
ability
quantify
selectivity
probative
findings).
By
ceasing
express
source
attribution
opinions
(identification/individualisation),
which
now
widely
exposed
unscientific,
disciplines
could
move
further
into
long-awaited
post-identification
era
pioneered
by
other
fields
such
genetics.
Language: Английский
Incorrect statistical reasoning in Guyll et al. leads to biased claims about strength of forensic evidence
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
121(45)
Published: Oct. 28, 2024
Giant
meteorite
impacts
during
Earth's
early
history
likely
had
significant
effects
on
life.
We
studied
the
surface
environment
and
life
of
a
Paleoarchean
impactor
~50
to
200×
larger
than
famous
K-Pg
impactor.
The
...Large
must
have
strongly
affected
habitability
Earth.
Rocks
Archean
Eon
record
at
least
16
major
impact
events,
involving
bolides
10
km
in
diameter.
These
probably
severe,
albeit
temporary,
...
Language: Английский
More unjustified inferences from limited data in
Richard E. Gutierrez
No information about this author
Law Probability and Risk,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract
In
recent
years,
multiple
scholars
have
criticized
the
design
of
studies
exploring
accuracy
firearms
examination
methods.
Rosenblum
et
al.
extend
those
criticisms
to
work
Guyll
on
practitioner
performance
when
comparing
fired
cartridge
cases.
But
while
thoroughly
dissect
issues
regarding
equiprobability
bias
and
positive
predictive
values
in
study,
they
do
not
delve
as
deeply
into
other
areas
such
variability
participant
performance,
well
sampling
participants
test
samples,
that
further
undercut
ability
generalize
al.’s
results.
This
commentary
extends
what
began
explores
how
low
rates
error
reported
by
likely
underestimate
potential
for
misidentifications
casework.
Ultimately,
given
convenience
authors
should
gone
beyond
descriptive
statistics
instead
draw
conclusive
inferences
classify
“a
highly
valid
forensic
technique.”
Language: Английский
Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons
Law Probability and Risk,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract
Reviews
conducted
by
the
National
Academy
of
Sciences
(2009)
and
President’s
Council
Advisors
on
Science
Technology
(2016)
concluded
that
field
forensic
firearm
comparisons
has
not
been
demonstrated
to
be
scientifically
valid.
Scientific
validity
requires
adequately
designed
studies
examiner
performance
in
terms
accuracy,
repeatability,
reproducibility.
Researchers
have
performed
“black-box”
with
goal
estimating
these
measures.
As
statisticians
expertise
experimental
design,
we
a
literature
search
such
date
then
evaluated
design
statistical
analysis
methods
used
each
study.
Our
conclusion
is
all
our
methodological
flaws
are
so
grave
they
render
invalid,
is,
incapable
establishing
scientific
firearms
examination.
Notably,
error
rates
among
examiners,
both
collectively
individually,
remain
unknown.
Therefore,
statements
about
common
origin
bullets
or
cartridge
cases
based
examination
“individual”
characteristics
do
basis.
We
provide
some
recommendations
for
future
studies.
Language: Английский
Cross entropy and log likelihood ratio cost as performance measures for multi‐conclusion categorical outcomes scales
Eric M. Warren,
No information about this author
John C. Handley,
No information about this author
H. David Sheets
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
Abstract
The
inconclusive
category
in
forensics
reporting
is
the
appropriate
response
many
cases,
but
it
poses
challenges
estimating
an
“error
rate”.
We
discuss
use
of
a
class
information‐theoretic
measures
related
to
cross
entropy
as
alternative
set
metrics
that
allows
for
performance
evaluation
results
presented
using
multi‐category
scales.
This
paper
shows
how
this
metrics,
and
particular
log
likelihood
ratio
cost,
which
already
with
forensic
methods
machine
learning
communities,
can
be
readily
adapted
widely
used
multiple
conclusions
Bayesian
credible
intervals
on
these
estimated
numerical
methods.
application
published
test
shown.
It
demonstrated,
results,
reducing
number
categories
proficiency
from
five
or
six
three
increases
entropy,
indicating
higher
was
justified,
they
increased
level
agreement
ground
truth.
Language: Английский